Research and Markets, the largest resource for market research information in world providing essential market research reports, industry research, industry analysis, forecasts, market studies, company profiles and country reports.
Welcome - Home - Register - Login - Help/FAQ - 0 items View Basket
Worlds Largest Market Research Resource - 722206 Live Reports
Search Research and Markets
  Search
Enter keywords, a title or
a report id number below.





Advanced   
Company search
Register for free email updates of market research
Currency
  Select a currency for use throughout the site



Viewing report

Order by Fax
Printer Friendly
PDF Brochure
Send to Friend
Enquire before Buying
| More
ElectronicAdd to Basket



2004 Review of Utility IVRUs: Benchmarks and Best Practices
E SOURCE, Oct 2004, Pages: 35


  Description  
  Table of Contents  
  Companies Mentioned  
    
    
   
 Enquire before Buying  
 Send to a Friend  

The interactive voice response unit (IVRU) should be the call centers best friend. It should be valued, carefully tended, and frequently evaluated and upgraded. It should be finely tuned to meet customers needs so it can fulfill its main mission of handling routine calls and freeing up costly positions for the tougher calls. Instead, the IVRU is treated as old technology—a second-rate, half-forgotten telephonic accessory. Nearly half of energy utilities upgrade their IVRUs less than once a year. And as our research shows, many companies apparently never listen to the whole system all the way through.

Our research shows that typical IVRUs in the utility industry may handle 20 or 25 percent of incoming calls without referring customers to a live agent; a few IVRUs handle up to 50 or 60 percent. (This percentage is known as a 'take-rate.') Other industries, including retail and financial services, claim from 40 to 70 percent take-rates, according to Ascent Group research. We believe that the overall lower-than-average usability of utility IVRUs that we found in our study goes a long way toward explaining the lag in their adoption by customers.

The highest rating we assigned was a 4, on a 5-point scale. Even these 'good' menus were plagued by serious problems, including hang-ups, dead ends, and long silences that made our researchers wonder if they had been disconnected. In addition to providing valuable benchmarking information, this report also offers specific and practical suggestions for making IVRUs more usable and more beneficial to the utilities that put them in place.

This is among the first independent reviews of utility customer service interactive voice response units (IVRUs). This report explains our findings and recommendations regarding the usability of electric and gas company IVRUs.


Customers who bought this item also bought

Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Systems - Global Strategic Business Report

Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Systems - An International Market Report

U.S. Interactive Voice Response Markets

European Interactive Voice Response Markets

U.S. IVR (Interactive Voice Response) System Markets

North American Interactive Voice Response & Voice-Activated Dialing Service Markets

Australia - Enhanced Voice Reverse Calls IVR Speech Recognition

Utilities Go Green: Worldwide Utility Solar Market Shares, Forecasts, and Strategies, 2008-2014

Usability Success Stories

Demand Response/Load Management Programs Outlook: Mid-2007 Survey Findings

Understanding Kids' Menus 2004

Australia - Enhanced Voice, Reverse Calls, IVR, Speech Recognition



Top of page


   All rights reserved. © Copyright 2009 Research and Markets
   Terms and conditions Privacy Policy Publishers Employment Opportunities Site Map Link to us Webmaster


Research and Markets RSS Feeds