|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
Academic Library Website Benchmarks
Primary Research Group, Jan 2007, Pages: 125
List of Tables
Survey Participants
Dimensions of the Sample
Summary of Main Findings
Chapter One: College Library Web Staff
Chapter Two: Navigation
Chapter Three: Content-Editing
Chapter Four: Technology
Chapter Five: Website Marketing
Chapter Six: Staffing the Website
Chapter Seven: Re-Design
Chapter Eight: Library Website Budget
Chapter Nine: Web Statistics
Chapter Ten: Online Forms & Script Work
Chapter Eleven: Federated Search Capability
Chapter Twelve: Web Communications and Marketing
Chapter Thirteen: Use of Consultants
Chapter Fourteen: Online Training
List of Tables
Table 1.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff
Table 1.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 1.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 1.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 1.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 1.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff
Table 1.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 1.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 1.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 1.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 1.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties
Table 1.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 1.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website by Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 1.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 1.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 2.1: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed
Table 2.2: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 2.3: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 2.4: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 2.5: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 3.1: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems
Table 3.2: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 3.3: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 3.4: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 3.5: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 3.6: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use
Table 3.7: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 3.8: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 3.9: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 3.10: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 3.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester
Table 3.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 3.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 3.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 3.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 3.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff
Table 3.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 3.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 3.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 3.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 4.1: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website 55
Table 4.2: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 4.3: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 4.4: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 4.5: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 4.6: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website
Table 4.7: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 4.8: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 4.9: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 4.10: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 4.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format
Table 4.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 4.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 4.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 4.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 4.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages
Table 4.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 4.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 4.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 4.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 4.21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website
Table 4.22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 4.23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 4.24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 4.25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.1: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace
Table 5.2: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.3: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.4: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.5: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.6: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube
Table 5.7: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.8: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.9: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.10: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.11: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life
Table 5.12: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.13: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.14: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.15: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.16: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook
Table 5.17: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.18: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.19: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.20: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website
Table 5.22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Subscribers to the Electronic Newsletters and RSS Feeds Offered by the Library
Table 5.27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Subscribers to the Electronic Newsletters and RSS Feeds Offered by the Library, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Subscribers to the Electronic Newsletters and RSS Feeds Offered by the Library, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.29: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources
Table 5.30: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.31: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.32: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.33: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website
Table 5.35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.38: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 6.1: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website
Table 6.2: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 6.3: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 6.4: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 6.5: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 6.6: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff
Table 6.7: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 6.8: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 6.9: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 6.10: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 6.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester
Table 6.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 6.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 6.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 6.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 6.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration
Table 6.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 6.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 6.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 6.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 7.1: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year
Table 7.2: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 7.3: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 7.4: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 7.5: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 7.6: Percentage of College Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years
Table 7.7: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 7.8: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 7.9: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 7.10: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 8.1: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget
Table 8.2: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 8.3: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 8.4: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 8.5: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 8.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$), Universe of All Libraries in the Sample
Table 8.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 8.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 8.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 8.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 8.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget
Table 8.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 8.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 8.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 8.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 8.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.)
Table 8.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 8.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 8.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 8.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 8.21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.)
Table 8.22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 8.23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 8.24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 8.25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 9.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website
Table 9.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 9.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 9.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 9.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 9.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session
Table 9.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 9.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 9.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 9.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel
Table 10.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians
Table 10.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent
Table 10.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer
Table 10.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.21: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves
Table 10.22: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.23: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.24: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.25: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.26: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation
Table 10.27: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.28: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.29: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.30: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.31: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service
Table 10.32: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.33: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.34: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.35: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.36: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made
Table 10.37: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.38: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.39: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.40: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.41: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans
Table 10.42: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.43: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.44: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.45: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.46: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library
Table 10.47: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.48: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.49: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.50: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 10.51: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class
Table 10.52: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Carnegie Class 105
Table 10.53: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 10.54: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.55: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 11.1: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once
Table 11.2: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 11.3: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 11.4: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 11.5: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 11.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website
Table 11.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 11.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 11.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 11.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 11.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities
Table 11.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 11.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 11.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 11.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 11.16: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use
Table 11.17: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 11.18: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 11.19: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 11.20: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.1: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News
Table 12.2: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.3: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.4: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.5: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.6: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News
Table 12.7: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.8: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.9: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.10: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.11: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News
Table 12.12: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.13: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.14: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.15: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.16: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News
Table 12.17: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.18: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.19: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.20: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.21: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News
Table 12.22: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.23: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.24: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.25: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff
Table 12.27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.29: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.30: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.31: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff
Table 12.32: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.33: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff
Table 12.37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.38: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.39: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.40: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 13.1: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website
Table 13.2: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 13.3: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 13.4: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 13.5: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 13.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website
Table 13.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 13.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 13.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 13.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 13.11: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website
Table 13.12: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 13.13: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 13.14: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 13.15: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 13.16: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?
Table 13.17: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 13.18: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 13.19: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 13.20: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 14.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website
Table 14.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 14.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 14.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 14.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 14.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year
Table 14.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 14.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 14.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 14.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Survey of College Website Management Practices
Research Library International Benchmarks
The Survey of Library Cafes
Survey of Library Services for Distance Learning Programs
The Survey of Library Database Licensing Practices
College Information Literacy Efforts Benchmarks
College Alumni Relations Benchmarks
Library Use of E-books, 2008-09
Corporate Library Benchmarks, 2007 Edition
The Survey of Academic Library Use of Instructional Technology
The Survey of College Purchasing Managers: 2009-10 Edition
Corporate Library Benchmarks, 2009 Edition
|
|
|
|
