|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The International Survey of Library & Museum Digitization Projects
Primary Research Group, Aug 2008, Pages: 97
LIST OF TABLES
PARTICIPANTS
SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS
SOURCE OF FUNDS
TREND IN SPENDING ON DIGITIZATION
Library Collaboration with other Departments of the Institution
Staffing of Digitization Projects
Spending for Equipment for Digitization
Number of Physical Exhibits Staged
Rights, Permissions and Copyright Clearance
Outsourcing of Digitization
Skill in Digitization
Use of Digital Asset Management Software
Use of Servers
Impact of Digitization on Microfilming and other Preservation Mediums
Development of Cataloging and Metadata in Digitization Projects
Using the Resources of Larger Organizations with Greater Experience in Digitization
Licensing or Renting the Digital Collection
Impact of Digitization on Sales of Reproductions
CHAPTER 1: OVERALL BUDGET
CHAPTER 2: FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR DIGITIZATION
CHAPTER 3: STAFFING & EQUIPMENT
CHAPTER 4: IMPACT OF ONLINE EXHIBITS
CHAPTER 5: LICENSING, PERMISSIONS & COPYRIGHT
CHAPTER 6: OUTSOURCING
CHAPTER 7: SCANNING, PHOTOGRAPHING AND OTHER DIGITIZATION METHODS
CHAPTER 8: DIGITAL ASSET MANAGEMENT
CHAPTER 9: IMPACT ON PRESERVATION
CHAPTER 10: CATALOGING
CHAPTER 11: COLLABORATIONS
CHAPTER 12: MARKETING
CHAPTER 13: FAVORED RESOURCES
CHAPTER 14: ADVICE FOR PEERS
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget for Digitization Projects (in US$)
Table 1.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget for Digitization Projects (in US$), Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 1.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget for Digitization Projects (in US$), Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 1.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget for Digitization Projects (in US$), Broken Out by Type of Library, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 1.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Annual Budget for Digitization Projects (in US$), Broken Out by Type of Library, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from the Library Budget
Table 2.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from the Library Budget, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from the Library Budget, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 2.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from the Library Budget, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Supplements from the Parent Institution
Table 2.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Supplements from the Parent Institution, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Supplements from the Parent Institution, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 2.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Supplements from the Parent Institution, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Grants & Fundraising
Table 2.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Grants & Fundraising, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Grants & Fundraising, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 2.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Grants & Fundraising, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 2.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Grants & Fundraising, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Endowments
Table 2.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Endowments, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Endowments, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 2.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Endowments, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 2.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Budget for Digitization Derived from Endowment, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.19: Outlook for Raising Money for Digitization Projects from Outside Sources
Table 2.20: Outlook for Raising Money for Digitization Projects from Outside Sources, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.21: Outlook for Raising Money for Digitization Projects from Outside Sources, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 2.22: Outlook for Raising Money for Digitization Projects from Outside Sources, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 2.23: Outlook for Raising Money for Digitization Projects from Outside Sources, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.24: Course of Probable Spending for Digitization over the Next Two Years
Table 2.25: Course of Probable Spending for Digitization over the Next Two Years, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.26: Course of Probable Spending for Digitization over the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 2.27: Course of Probable Spending for Digitization over the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 2.28: Course of Probable Spending for Digitization over the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.29: Has Your Division Teamed Up with any other Department or Faculty of the Organization to Work Jointly on Digitization Projects?
Table 2.30: Has Your Division Teamed Up with any other Department or Faculty of the Organization to Work Jointly on Digitization Projects? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.31: Has Your Division Teamed Up with any other Department or Faculty of the Organization to Work Jointly on Digitization Projects? Broken Out by Type Of Library
Table 2.32: Has Your Division Teamed Up with any other Department or Faculty of the Organization to Work Jointly on Digitization Projects? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 2.33: Has Your Division Teamed Up with any other Department or Faculty of the Organization to Work Jointly on Digitization Projects? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 2.34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Funding from Academic Departments (not administrative, which are discussed separately) to Digitization Projects over the Past Three Years (in US$)
Table 2.35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Funding from Academic Departments (not administrative, which are discussed separately) to Digitization Projects over the Past Three Years, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 2.36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Funding from Academic Departments (not administrative, which are discussed separately) to Digitization Projects over the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 2.37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Funding from Academic Departments (not administrative, which are discussed separately) to Digitization Projects over the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 3.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals at the Organizations in the Sample Currently Spending at Least Part of Their Workday on Digitization Projects
Table 3.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals at the Organizations in the Sample Currently Spending at Least Part of Their Workday on Digitization Projects, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 3.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals at the Organizations in the Sample Currently Spending at Least Part of Their Workday on Digitization Projects, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 3.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals at the Organizations in the Sample Currently Spending at Least Part of Their Workday on Digitization Projects, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 3.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals at the Organizations in the Sample Currently Spending at Least Part of Their Workday on Digitization Projects, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization
Table 3.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Hours Annually that Staff and Associated Workers Devoted to Digitization Efforts
Table 3.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Hours Annually that Staff and Associated Workers Devoted to Digitization Efforts, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 3.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Hours Annually that Staff and Associated Workers Devoted to Digitization Efforts, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 3.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Hours Annually that Staff and Associated Workers Devoted to Digitization Efforts, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 3.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Hours Annually that Staff and Associated Workers Devoted to Digitization Efforts, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 3.11: Predicted Trend in Use of Labor on Digitization Projects
Table 3.12: Predicted Trend in Use of Labor on Digitization Projects, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 3.13: Predicted Trend in Use of Labor on Digitization Projects, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 3.14: Predicted Trend in Use of Labor on Digitization Projects, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 3.15: Predicted Trend in Use of Labor on Digitization Projects, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 3.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Special Collections Division Spending in the Past Three Years on Equipment to Copy, Duplicate, Record, Photograph, Scan or Transform Content of any Kind into Digital Formats (in US$)
Table 3.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Special Collections Division Spending in the Past Three Years on Equipment to Copy, Duplicate, Record, Photograph, Scan or Transform Content of any Kind into Digital Formats, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 3.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Special Collections Division Spending in the Past Three Years on Equipment to Copy, Duplicate, Record, Photograph, Scan or Transform Content of any Kind into Digital Formats, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 3.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Special Collections Division Spending in the Past Three Years on Equipment to Copy, Duplicate, Record, Photograph, Scan or Transform Content of any Kind into Digital Formats, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 3.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in the Annual Rate of Spending on Equipment for the Purpose of Transforming Content of any Kind into Digital Formats over the Last Three Years
Table 3.21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in the Annual Rate of Spending on Equipment for the Purpose of Transforming Content of any Kind into Digital Formats over the Last Three Years, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 3.22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in the Annual Rate of Spending on Equipment for the Purpose of Transforming Content of any Kind into Digital Formats over the Last Three Years, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 3.23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in the Annual Rate of Spending on Equipment for the Purpose of Transforming Content of any Kind into Digital Formats over the Last Three Years, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 4.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Unique Physical Exhibits Staged in the Past Year
Table 4.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Unique Physical Exhibits Staged in the Past Year, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 4.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Unique Physical Exhibits Staged in the Past Year, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 4.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Unique Physical Exhibits Staged in the Past Year, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 5.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent in the Past Two Years in Obtaining Rights, Permissions or Copyright Clearance
Table 5.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent in the Past Two Years in Obtaining Rights, Permissions or Copyright Clearance, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 5.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent in the Past Two Years in Obtaining Rights, Permissions or Copyright Clearance, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 5.4: Has Your Organization Outsourced any Aspect of Rights/Permissions/Copyright Management to Outside Parties?
Table 5.5: Has Your Organization Outsourced any Aspect of Rights/Permissions/Copyright Management to Outside Parties? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 5.6: Has Your Organization Outsourced any Aspect of Rights/Permissions/Copyright Management to Outside Parties? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 5.7: Has Your Organization Outsourced any Aspect of Rights/Permissions/Copyright Management to Outside Parties? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 5.8: Has Your Organization Outsourced any Aspect of Rights/Permissions/Copyright Management to Outside Parties? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 6.1: Has Your Organization Outsourced Digitization, in Whole or in Part, to an Outside Party, Another Organization, Private Consultant or Company?
Table 6.2: Has Your Organization Outsourced Digitization, in Whole or in Part, to an Outside Party, Another Organization, Private Consultant or Company? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 6.3: Has Your Organization Outsourced Digitization, in Whole or in Part, to an Outside Party, Another Organization, Private Consultant or Company? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 6.4: Has Your Organization Outsourced Digitization, in Whole or in Part, to an Outside Party, Another Organization, Private Consultant Or Company? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 6.5: Has Your Organization Outsourced Digitization, in Whole or in Part, to an Outside Party, Another Organization, Private Consultant or Company? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 6.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending Spent over the Past Three Years for Outsourcing of Digitization (in US$)
Table 6.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending Spent over the Past Three Years for Outsourcing of Digitization, Broken Out by Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 6.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending Spent over the Past Three Years for Outsourcing of Digitization, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 6.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending Spent over the Past Three Years for Outsourcing of Digitization, Broken Out by Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization
Table 6.10: Which Phrase Best Describes Your Attitude Towards the Outsourcing of Digitization Work?
Table 6.11: Which Phrase Best Describes Your Attitude Towards the Outsourcing Of Digitization Work? Broken Out by U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 6.12: Which Phrase Best Describes Your Attitude Towards the Outsourcing of Digitization Work? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 6.13: Which Phrase Best Describes Your Attitude Towards the Outsourcing of Digitization Work? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 6.14: Which Phrase Best Describes Your Attitude Towards the Outsourcing of Digitization Work? Broken Out by Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 6.15: Over the Past Three Years What Percentage of Your Digitization Work Would You Say hat You Outsourced to Outside Parties?
Table 6.16: Over the Past Three Years What Percentage of Your Digitization Work Would You Say That You Outsourced to Outside Parties? Broken Out by Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 6.17: Over the Past Three Years What Percentage of Your Digitization Work Would You Say That You Outsourced to Outside Parties? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 6.18: Over the Past Three Years What Percentage of Your Digitization Work Would You Say That You Outsourced to Outside Parties? Broken Out by U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 6.19: In general when your work requires digital image enhancement, does your organization:
Table 6.20: In general when your work requires digital image enhancement, does your organization, Broken Out by Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 6.21: In general when your work requires digital image enhancement, does your organization, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 6.22: In general when your work requires digital image enhancement, does your organization, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 6.23: In general when your work requires digital image enhancement, does your organization, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 7.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Dpi of a Typical Scan
Table 7.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Dpi of a Typical Scan, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 7.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Dpi of a Typical Scan, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 7.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Dpi of a Typical Scan, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 7.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Scanning or Photographing Text
Table 7.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Scanning or Photographing Text, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 7.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Scanning or Photographing Text, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 7.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Scanning or Photographing Text, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 7.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Keying in Text
Table 7.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Keying in Text, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 7.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Keying in Text, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 7.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Text that Has Been Digitized over the Past Three Years by Keying in Text, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 7.13: Self Assessment of Institutional Quality Control Efforts in Image and Text Digitization
Table 7.14: Self Assessment of Institutional Quality Control Efforts in Image and Text Digitization, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 7.15: Self Assessment of Institutional Quality Control Efforts in Image and Text Digitization, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 7.16: Self Assessment of Institutional Quality Control Efforts in Image and Text Digitization, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 7.17: Self Assessment of Institutional Quality Control Efforts in Image and Text Digitization, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 8.1: Does the Division Currently Have any Form of Digital Asset Management Software?
Table 8.2: Does the Division Currently Have any Form of Digital Asset Management Software? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 8.3: Does the Division Currently Have any Form of Digital Asset Management Software? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 8.4: Does the Division Currently Have any Form of Digital Asset Management Software? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 8.5: Does the Division Currently Have any Form of Digital Asset Management Software? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 8.6: Does the Division(s) Use Content DM?
Table 8.7: Does the Division(s) Use Content DM? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 8.8: Does the Division(s) Use Content DM? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 8.9: Does the Division(s) Use Content DM? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 8.10: Does the Division(s) Use Content DM? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 8.11: Does the Division(s) Use Luna Insight?
Table 8.12: Does the Division(s) Use Luna Insight?Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 8.13: Does the Division(s) Use Luna Insight? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 8.14: Does the Division(s) Use Luna Insight? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 8.15: Does the Division(s) Use Luna Insight? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 8.16: Does the Division(s) Use DigiTool?
Table 8.17: Does the Division(s) Use DigiTool? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 8.18: Does the Division(s) Use DigiTool? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 8.19: Does the Division(s) Use DigiTool? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 8.20: Does the Division(s) Use DigiTool? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 8.21: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Your Own Divisional Servers?
Table 8.22: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Your Own Divisional Servers? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 8.23: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Your Own Divisional Servers? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 8.24: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Your Own Divisional Servers? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 8.25: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Your Own Divisional Servers? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 8.26: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Specific Servers Dedicated to Specific Digitization Projects?
Table 8.27: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Specific Servers Dedicated to Specific Digitization Projects? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 8.28: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Specific Servers Dedicated to Specific Digitization Projects? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 8.29: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Specific Servers Dedicated to Specific Digitization Projects? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 8.30: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on Specific Servers Dedicated to Specific Digitization Projects? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 8.31: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on the General College/University/Museum Servers?
Table 8.32: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on the General College/University/Museum Servers? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 8.33: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on the General College/University/Museum Servers? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 8.34: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on the General College/University/Museum Servers? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 8.35: Do You Store the Division's Digitization Projects on The General College/University/Museum Servers? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 9.1: The Impact of Digitization on Long Term Use of Microfilming and other Preservation Mediums
Table 9.2: The Impact of Digitization on Long Term Use of Microfilming and other Preservation Mediums, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 9.3: The Impact of Digitization on Long Term Use of Microfilming and other Preservation Mediums, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 9.4: The Impact of Digitization on Long Term Use of Microfilming and other Preservation Mediums, Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 9.5: The Impact of Digitization on Long Term Use of Microfilming and other Preservation Mediums, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization
Table 10.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Time Required for Digitization Projects Accounted for by Cataloging and Metadata Issues
Table 10.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Time Required for Digitization Projects Accounted for by Cataloging and Metadata Issues, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 10.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Time Required for Digitization Projects Accounted for by Cataloging and Metadata Issues, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 10.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Labor Time Required for Digitization Projects Accounted for by Cataloging and Metadata Issues, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization
Table 10.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Expense of Digitization Projects Accounted for by Expenses Related to Cataloging and Metadata
Table 10.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Expense of Digitization Projects Accounted for by Expenses Related to Cataloging and Metadata, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 10.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Expense of Digitization Projects Accounted for by Expenses Related to Cataloging and Metadata, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 10.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of theTotal Expense of Digitization Projects Accounted for by Expenses Related to Cataloging and Metadata, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 11.1: Has Your Organization Largely Outsourced a Digitization Project to Another Organization, such as a Major Museum or University that Specializes in Such Projects?
Table 11.2: Has Your Organization Largely Outsourced a Digitization Project to Another Organization, such as a Major Museum or University that Specializes in Such Projects? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 11.3: Has Your Organization Lagely Outsourced a Digitization Project to Another Organization, such as a Major Museum or University that Specializes in Such Projects? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 11.4: Has Your Organization Largely Outsourced a Digitization Project to Another Organization, such as a Major Museum or University that Specializes in Such Projects? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 11.5: Has Your Organization Largely Outsourced a Digitization Project to Another Organization, such as a Major Museum or University that Specializes in Such Projects? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 11.6: The phrase that best summarizes your opinion of the following philosophy: 'Small colleges and museums should let larger or more specialized universities or museums handle many of their digitization projects since these institutions have the equipment, experience and economies of scale to do a better job at lower cost than many smaller institutions can do for themselves.'
Table 11.7: The phrase that best summarizes your opinion of the following philosophy: 'Small colleges and museums should let larger or more specialized universities or museums handle many of their digitization projects since these institutions have the equipment, experience and economies of scale to do a better job at lower cost than many smaller institutions can do for themselves.' Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 11.8: The phrase that best summarizes your opinion of the following philosophy: 'Small colleges and museums should let larger or more specialized universities or museums handle many of their digitization projects since these institutions have the equipment, experience and economies of scale to do a better job at lower cost than many smaller institutions can do for themselves.' Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 11.9: The phrase that best summarizes your opinion of the following philosophy: 'Small colleges and museums should let larger or more specialized universities or museums handle many of their digitization projects since these institutions have the equipment, experience and economies of scale to do a better job at lower cost than many smaller institutions can do for themselves.' Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 11.10: The phrase that best summarizes your opinion of the following philosophy: 'Small colleges and museums should let larger or more specialized universities or museums handle many of their digitization projects since these institutions have the equipment, experience and economies of scale to do a better job at lower cost than many smaller institutions can do for themselves.' Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 12.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending over the Past Three Years on Marketing and Publicizing Digitized Special Collections (in US$)
Table 12.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending over the Past Three Years on Marketing and Publicizing Digitized Special Collections, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 12.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending over the Past Three Years on Marketing and Publicizing Digitized Special Collections, Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 12.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending over the Past Three Years on Marketing and Publicizing Digitized Special Collections, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 12.5: Does the Division(s) License or Rent Use of any Aspect of its Digital Collection to any Party?
Table 12.6: Does the Division(s) License or Rent Use of any Aspect of its Digital Collection to any Party? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 12.7: Does the Division(s) License or Rent Use of any Aspect of its Digital Collection to any Party? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 12.8: Does the Division(s) License or Rent Use of any Aspect of its Digital Collection to any Party? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 12.9: Does the Division(s) License pr Rent Use of any Aspect of its Digital Collection to any Party? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 12.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Revenue the Division Accrued from Licensing, Renting or Selling any Aspects of its Digital Collections Over the Past Three Years (in US$)
Table 12.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Revenue the Division Accrued from Licensing, Renting or Selling any Aspects of its Digital Collections Over the Past Three Years, Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 12.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Revenue the Division Accrued from Licensing, Renting or Selling any Aspects of its Digital Collections Over the Past Three Years, Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 12.13: Has the Digitization of any of Your Collections Led to Higher Sales of Reproductions and Items Related to Your Collection Through Gift Shops, Catalogs or other Venues?
Table 12.14: Has the Digitization of any of Your Collections Led to Higher Sales of Reproductions and Items Related to Your Collection Through Gift Shops, Catalogs or Other Venues? Broken Out for U.S. And Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 12.15: Has the Digitization of any of Your Collections Led to Higher Sales of Reproductions and Items Related to Your Collection Through Gift Shops, Catalogs or Other Venues? Broken Out by Type Of Library
Table 12.16: Has the Digitization of any of Your Collections Led to Higher Sales of Reproductions and Items Related to Your Collection Through Gift Shops, Catalogs or other Venues? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 12.17: Has the Digitization of any of Your Collections Led to Higher Sales of Reproductions and Items Related to Your Collection Through Gift Shops, Catalogs or other Venues? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Table 12.18: If the Library Sells Reproductions of Elements of its Collection, How Would You Describe the Impact of Digitization on Sales of These Items?
Table 12.19: If the Library Sells Reproductions of Elements of its Collection, How Would You Describe the Impact of Digitization on Sales of These Items? Broken Out for U.S. and Non-U.S. Libraries
Table 12.20: If the Library Sells Reproductions of Elements of its Collection, How Would You Describe the Impact of Digitization on Sales of These Items? Broken Out by Type of Library
Table 12.21: If the Library Sells Reproductions of Elements of its Collection, How Would You Describe the Impact of Digitization on Sales of These Items? Broken Out by Dominant Type of Content Digitized
Table 12.22: If the Library Sells Reproductions of Elements of its Collection, How Would You Describe the Impact of Digitization on Sales of These Items? Broken Out by Annual Spending on Digitization (US$)
Customers who bought this item also bought
Academic Library Cataloging Practices Benchmarks
Emerging Issues in Academic Library Cataloging & Technical Services
Research Library International Benchmarks
The Survey of Library Database Licensing Practices
The Official Museum Directory™
Creating the Digital Art Library
Libraries & the Mega-Internet Sites
The Survey of Library Cafes
Library Use of E-books, 2008-09
Academic Library Website Benchmarks
Corporate Library Benchmarks, 2007 Edition
Disaster Management in Archives, Libraries and Museums
|
|
|
|
