Research and Markets, the largest resource for market research information in world providing essential market research reports, industry research, industry analysis, forecasts, market studies, company profiles and country reports.
Welcome - Home - Register - Login - Help/FAQ - 0 items View Basket
Worlds Largest Market Research Resource - 722239 Live Reports
Search Research and Markets
  Search
Enter keywords, a title or
a report id number below.





Advanced   
Company search
Register for free email updates of market research
Currency
  Select a currency for use throughout the site



Viewing report

Order by Fax
Printer Friendly
PDF Brochure
Send to Friend
Enquire before Buying
| More
ElectronicAdd to Basket



Data Breaches: What Should Banks, Payments Firms and Merchants do to Protect Brand Equity and Customer Loyalty?
Javelin Strategy & Research, Oct 2008, Pages: 48


  Description  
  Table of Contents  
  Companies Mentioned  
    
    
   
 Enquire before Buying  
 Send to a Friend  

With more than one in ten consumers notified of a data breach in the last year, concern over personal data security and identity fraud is also on the rise. Breaches are about more than identity theft or fraud, placing brand equity and customer loyalty at serious risk. A patchwork of state-by-state notification laws imposes stringent requirements from a consumer-protection standpoint, mandating breached organizations to notify all affected individuals.

This report examines the consumer-facing implications of data breaches, and how public perceptions impact reputations and business relationships, particularly those of financial institutions. Using robust consumer data from actual data breach victims as well as data from the 2008 Identity Fraud Survey, Javelin analyzes consumer reactions to breach notification, perceptions of who is at fault, the sensitivity of the data being exposed, and the impact of breaches on consumer financial behaviour, such as payment card usage. In addition, Javelin provides strategic recommendations for breach response and notification, as well as an overview of third-party vendors providing breach resolution services.

Primary Questions

- In the face of escalating data breaches, what should financial institutions and other companies do to protect brands and customer loyalty?

- How do victims respond to breach notification, and how does this impact their relationship with their financial institution?

- What kind of sensitive information is being compromised, and how does exposure change consumer behaviour?

- Do breach victims use their credit or debit cards less as a result of the breach?

- What are consumers’ views of data security, identity theft and fraud as it relates to financial institutions, and FIs’ ability to handle breaches responsibly?

This report is mainly based on data collected from an online survey of a random-sample panel of 441 data breach victims in May 2008. The overall margin of sampling error is ±4.67 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Data is also taken from the Javelin Annual Household Finance Survey in an online consumer survey that was most recently deployed in March 2008, with a sample size of 2,350 respondents. This survey targeted respondents based on representative proportions of gender, age and income compared to the overall U.S. online population.

The overall margin of sampling error is ±2.1 percentage points at the 95% confidence level. Data was also accessed from the Identity Theft Resource Centre, a non-profit organization which compiles information about public data breaches to help understand and prevent identity theft. The survey is conducted each year using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) via Random-Digit-Dialling (RDD). The total number of respondents was 5,075 in 2007; 5,006 in 2006; 5,003 in 2005; 5,004 in 2004; and 4,000 in 2003. The survey targeted respondents based on representative proportions of gender, age, and income compared to all U.S. adult consumers. For questions answered by all respondents, the maximum margin of sampling error is +/- 1.4% at the 95% confidence level. For questions answered by all 445 identity-fraud victims, the maximum margin of sampling error is +/- 4.7% at the 95% confidence level. For questions answered by a proportion of all identity-fraud victims, the maximum margin of sampling error varies and is greater than +/- 4.7% at the 95% confidence level.

Product samples

A sample for this product is available. Please Login/Register to download this sample.

Customers who bought this item also bought

Data Breach Notifications: Victims Face Four Times Higher Risk of Fraud

New Federal Personal Health Information Breach Notification Law: HITECH Act— A Tsunami of Opportunity

Profiling “Severely Injured” Identity Fraud Victims: Using Triage to Ease the Pain of Customers “At Risk”

Data Breaches and ID Fraud: Misunderstanding Could Fail Consumers and Burden Businesses

Data Breaches and Buyer Behavior:Moving PCI Compliance from Costly Burden to Competitive Advantage

2009 Identity Fraud Survey Report: Identity Fraud on the Rise But Consumer Costs Plummet as Protections Increase

2008 Identity Fraud Forecast: Fraud Techniques will Evolve in Tandem with Industry Defenses

2008 Identity Fraud Survey Report: Identity Fraud Continues to Decline, But Criminals More Effective at Using all Channels

2007 Identity Fraud Survey Report: Identity Fraud Is Dropping, Continued Vigilance Necessary

A Guide for Building a Data Breach Response Plan

Understanding How PCI-Compliant Companies Can Be Breached: Security in a Post-Heartland World

2008 Identity Fraud Survey Report Excerpts for Card Issuers: Identity Fraud Continues to Decline, But Criminals More Effective at Using All Channels



Top of page


   All rights reserved. © Copyright 2009 Research and Markets
   Terms and conditions Privacy Policy Publishers Employment Opportunities Site Map Link to us Webmaster


Research and Markets RSS Feeds