|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
Instant Impact: What HR Professionals Need to Know About the Ricci v. DeStefano Supreme Court Verdict – Immediately Updating Testing & Interviewing Policies that Could Cause Workplace Discrimination Lawsuits
ExecSense, July 2009, Minutes: 45
In Instant Impact: What HR Managers Need to Know About the Ricci v. DeStefano Supreme Court Verdict ExecSense examines the ramifications on HR professionals, their companies and any testing procedures that could cause exposure to workplace discrimination lawsuits. Take the 60 minutes to view this Instant Impact webinar to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of the topic by your CEO, employees, and other professionals with whom you discuss the topic.
Upon ordering, you will receive an email with a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer or mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry). The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the Ricci v. DeStefano supreme court decision and it’s impact on HR professionals, their companies and any testing procedures
- The 10 questions being asked the most by HR managers regarding the impact of this case on workplace discrimination issues and the steps they should now be taking
- Understanding the impact on any type of exams for employees, including tests of personality, computer skills, physical fitness or honesty
- Case studies of what other companies are doing and a 5-point checklist every HR manager should employ at their company
Praise for ExecSense:
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leaader, Womble Carlyle
“Well organized, well articulated, and easy to follow. The ExecSense Webinar I attended was the best virtual learning experience I've had in quite some time.” – Brian K. Moore, HR Communications, Humana
Customers who bought this item also bought
Instant Impact: What Ricci v. DeStefano Means for Civil Rights Lawyers, Their Clients & Workplace Discrimination Issues
Instant Impact: What Ricci v. DeStefano Means for Labor & Employment Lawyers, Their Clients and Workplace Discrimination Issues
The Instant Impact of Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson on ADR Lawyers and Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Agreements Expressly Assigning to Arbitration the “Gateway” Issue of the Enforceability of the Agreement to Arbitrate
The Instant Impact of LeBron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital (Ill. Feb. 4, 2010) on Health Care Lawyers and Caps on Medical Malpractice Awards for Noneconomic Damages
The Instant Impact of American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc. (Penn. Aug. 17, 2010) on Insurers' Ability to Recoup Defense Costs for Uninsured Claims
The Instant Impact of Smith v. Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and the Application of Mixed-Motive Liability to Title VII Retaliation Claims
The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence
The Instant Impact of Sabinsa Corp. v. Creative Compounds, LLC (3rd Cir. July 9, 2010) on "Likelihood of Confusion" Analysis in Trademark Infringement Litigation
What Criminal Defense Lawyers Need to Know About Protecting Their Clients' Miranda Rights After Berghuis v. Thompkins (ExecSense Webinars)
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
|
|
|
|
