|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
Instant Impact: What Ricci v. DeStefano Means for Labor & Employment Lawyers, Their Clients and Workplace Discrimination Issues
ExecSense, July 2009, Minutes: 70
Instant Impact: What Ricci v. DeStefano Means for Labor/Employment Lawyers, Their Clients & Workplace Discrimination Issues is a time efficient way to get up to speed regarding the Supreme Court case, be ready to handle client questions, and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this Instant Impact webinar to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the ramifications of the topic by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the topic.
Upon ordering, you will receive an email with a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer or mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry). The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by two experts on this topic, Paul R. Garry and Anna Wermuth (Partners, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the Ricci v. DeStefano decision and it’s impact on Labor/Employment lawyers and their clients
- The 10 questions being asked the most by clients regarding the impact of this case on workplace discrimination issues
- Perspective on helping clients understand the immediate ramifications of this case, especially as it relates to any type of exams for employees, including tests of personality, computer skills, physical fitness or honesty they may be using
- Proactive strategies and billable opportunities for current and prospective clients as a result of this news
Praise for ExecSense:
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leaader, Womble Carlyle
“Thorough, informative and interesting...an efficient, effective means of gaining in depth insight into topics that affect every executive's business decision-making.” - Greg Nowak, Partner, Pepper Hamilton
“Well organized, well articulated, and easy to follow. The ExecSense Webinar I attended was the best virtual learning experience I've had in quite some time.” – Brian K. Moore, HR Communications, Humana
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
“A tremendous time saver for the busy attorney…” – Michael Goshko, Burns & Levinson
Customers who bought this item also bought
Instant Impact: What Ricci v. DeStefano Means for Civil Rights Lawyers, Their Clients & Workplace Discrimination Issues
Instant Impact: What HR Professionals Need to Know About the Ricci v. DeStefano Supreme Court Verdict – Immediately Updating Testing & Interviewing Policies that Could Cause Workplace Discrimination Lawsuits
The Instant Impact of Smith v. Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and the Application of Mixed-Motive Liability to Title VII Retaliation Claims
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About the Impact of Lopez v. Pacific Maritime
The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence
The Instant Impact of Rederford v. U.S. Airways (1st Cir. Dec. 14, 2009) on Employment Lawyers and the Discharge of Employment Discrimination “Claims” in Bankruptcy
The Instant Impact of Polycarpe v. E&S Landscaping, Inc. (11th Cir. Aug. 31, 2010) on Future FLSA Litigation Against Small Businesses
The Instant Impact of Hatmaker v. Memorial Med. Ctr. on the Level of Protection Applicable to an Employee's "Participation" in a Pre-EEOC Internal Harassment Investigation for Purposes of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Section
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About Ames v. Home Depot (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2011)
|
|
|
|
