|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
Understanding the Instant Impact of Halpert v. Manhattan Apartments (2nd Cir. Sept. 10, 2009) on Employment Lawyers & Their Clients - Why Employers May Now be Liable for Acts of Discrimination Regarding Independent Contractors
ExecSense, Oct 2009, Pages: 47
'Understanding the Instant Impact of Halpert v. Manhattan Apartments (2nd Cir. Sept. 10, 2009) on Employment Lawyers & Their Clients” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of the case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of the topic by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as employers may now be liable in new ways for acts of discrimination regarding independent contractors.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and independent contractor discrimination, Dan Forman (Partner, Carlton DiSante & Freudenberger), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of Halpert v. Manhattan Apartments on acts of discrimination regarding independent contractors
- Proactive strategies employment lawyers should be providing for their clients regarding immediate changes to their policies regarding independent contractors
- The 10 questions being asked the most by employment lawyers and their clients with respect to how this will impact them and what steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other lawyers are doing for their clients based on this ruling and how to explain to clients why these changes need to be implemented immediately
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
The Impact of Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc. (3rd Cir. Aug. 28, 2009) on Gender Stereotype Discrimination and Homosexual Employees
The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence
The Instant Impact of Smith v. Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and the Application of Mixed-Motive Liability to Title VII Retaliation Claims
The Instant Impact of Rederford v. U.S. Airways (1st Cir. Dec. 14, 2009) on Employment Lawyers and the Discharge of Employment Discrimination “Claims” in Bankruptcy
Understanding the Instant Impact of Cincom Systems, Inc. v. Novelis Corp. (6th Cir. Sept. 25, 2009) on Statutory Mergers and Copyright Infringement
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About Ames v. Home Depot (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2011)
The Instant Impact of Hatmaker v. Memorial Med. Ctr. on the Level of Protection Applicable to an Employee's "Participation" in a Pre-EEOC Internal Harassment Investigation for Purposes of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Section
The Instant Impact of GSI Commerce Solutions Inc. v. BabyCenter LLC (2nd Cir. Aug. 18, 2010) on the Duty of Loyalty and Representation of Parties Adverse to a Firm Client's Affiliate/Subsidiary
The Instant Impact of Polycarpe v. E&S Landscaping, Inc. (11th Cir. Aug. 31, 2010) on Future FLSA Litigation Against Small Businesses
|
|
|
|
