|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Impact of Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc. (3rd Cir. Aug. 28, 2009) on Gender Stereotype Discrimination and Homosexual Employees
ExecSense, Oct 2009, Minutes: 58
'The Instant Impact of Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc.” is a time efficient way for labor/employment lawyers to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of the case and take proactive steps on behalf of clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of the topic by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as situations involving gender stereotype discrimination and homosexual employees will now be handled very differently, and companies need to update their policies accordingly.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and gender discrimination, Jeremy Pasternak, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of Prowel v. Wise on gender discrimination and homosexual employees
- Perspective on the most important differences between a gender stereotype discrimination claim (permitted under Title VII) and a sexual orientation discrimination claim (not permitted under Title VII) that employment lawyers need to understand to properly advise their clients
- The 10 questions being asked the most by employment lawyers and their clients with respect to how this will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Examples of “red flag” behavior by a client’s employees towards another employee that could make the client liable for gender stereotype discrimination
- Case studies of what other lawyers are doing for their clients based on this ruling and how to explain to clients why these changes need to be implemented immediately
Customers who bought this item also bought
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About the Impact of Lopez v. Pacific Maritime
The Instant Impact of Rederford v. U.S. Airways (1st Cir. Dec. 14, 2009) on Employment Lawyers and the Discharge of Employment Discrimination “Claims” in Bankruptcy
The Instant Impact of Smith v. Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and the Application of Mixed-Motive Liability to Title VII Retaliation Claims
The Instant Impact of Hatmaker v. Memorial Med. Ctr. on the Level of Protection Applicable to an Employee's "Participation" in a Pre-EEOC Internal Harassment Investigation for Purposes of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Section
Understanding the Instant Impact of Halpert v. Manhattan Apartments (2nd Cir. Sept. 10, 2009) on Employment Lawyers & Their Clients - Why Employers May Now be Liable for Acts of Discrimination Regarding Independent Contractors
The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence
The Instant Impact of Robinson-Smith v. Gov't Employees Ins. Co. (D.C. Cir. Jan. 5, 2010) on Employment Lawyers, Overtime Benefits, and FLSA Administrative Exemptions
What to Watch for with Proposed Legislation That Would Overrule the Supreme Court’s Gross v. FBL Financial Decision – Understanding the Potential Impact for Employment Lawyers on Age Discrimination
The Instant Impact of Ansys, Inc. v. Computational Dynamics North America, Ltd. (1st Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and Drafting & Enforcing Noncompetition Agreements
The Instant Impact of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella (3rd Cir. July 27, 2010) on the Standard for Granting Preliminary Injunctions Against Employment by a Competitor Due to Potential Disclosure of Trade Secrets
|
|
|
|
