|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
What Insurance Lawyers Need to Know About the Instant Impact of Corban v. USAA (MS Oct. 8, 2009) on Anti-Concurrent Clauses, Hurricane Katrina, and the Burden of Proof
ExecSense, Oct 2009, Minutes: 60
'What Insurance Lawyers Need to Know About the Instant Impact of Corban v. USAA” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of the case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of the topic by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as courts in other hurricane-prone jurisdictions will now apply policy language very differently.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case, Clarke Holland, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of Corban v. USAA on anti-concurrent clauses, hurricane Katrina and the burden of proof
- Perspective on the critical aspects of the Mississippi Supreme Court’s decision (e.g., how the water damages exclusion and the ACC clause apply to hurricane losses, who has the burden of proof) with how courts in other hurricane-prone jurisdictions have applied the same (or similar) policy language
- The 10 questions being asked the most by insurance lawyers and their clients with respect to how this will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other lawyers are doing for their clients based on this ruling and how they are updating their strategies accordingly for similar cases
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact on Insurance Lawyers of Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co. (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2009) on Aggregating Claims Arising from the Same Product Defect and the Definition of “Occurrence”
The Instant Impact of Papudesu v. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association of Rhode Island on Insurance Lawyers & The Right to Settle Language in Professional Liability Policies
Understanding the Instant Impact of In re Tousa, Inc. (Bkrcy. S.D. Fla. Oct. 13, 2009) on Bankruptcy Lawyers – New Precedents for Rescue Financing, Liens on Subsidiary Assets, and Fraudulent Conveyances
The Instant Impact of In re Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. (E.D. Penn. Nov. 10, 2009) on Bankruptcy Lawyers & Secured Creditors’ Rights in Section 1129(b)(2)(A) Cramdowns
The Instant Impact of Rosciti v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co. (D.R.I. Aug 30, 2010) on “Direct Action” Statutes and Plaintiffs' Ability to Bypass Bankrupt Policyholders' Self-Insured Retentions to Recover Directly from an Excess Insurer
The Instant Impact of US Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Ibanez (Jan. 7, 2011) on the Residential Securitized Mortgage Market
The Instant Impact of Endurance Amer. Spec. Ins. Co. v. Brown, Miclette, & Britt, Inc. (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers - Why Insurance Companies May Now be Required to Defend Lawsuits Arising from Ponzi Schemes and Securities Violations
The 10 Most Important International Developments from 2009 for Corporate Lawyers – How to Capitalize on These Developments in 2010 to Generate More Business
What Insurance Lawyers Need to Know About Interpreting and Analyzing Financial Statements - Understanding the Most Important Parts of Income Statements, Balance Sheets and Cash Flow Statements That Impact Insurance Lawyers & Their Clients
Understanding the Impact of the Top Ten Developments in 2009 for Bankruptcy Lawyers
|
|
|
|
