|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
What to Watch for with Proposed Legislation That Would Overrule the Supreme Court’s Gross v. FBL Financial Decision – Understanding the Potential Impact for Employment Lawyers on Age Discrimination
ExecSense, Oct 2009, Minutes: 60
“What to Watch for With Proposed Legislation That Would Overrule the Supreme Court’s Gross v. FBL Financial Decision” is a time efficient way for labor and employment lawyers to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and potential ramifications of the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you are prepared and have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the legislation by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the topic, as age discrimination charges may now be evaluated very differently than in the past.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this legislation, Erin Harris, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act
- A detailed look at the five-most important ramifications of the proposed legislation, the immediate client impact and what proactive steps labor and employment lawyers should be taking
- The 10 questions being asked the most by labor and employment lawyers and their clients with respect to this legislation and how and when it could impact their hiring and firing procedures
- Case studies of what other labor and employment lawyers are contemplating doing for their clients based on this legislation
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Smith v. Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and the Application of Mixed-Motive Liability to Title VII Retaliation Claims
What Tax Lawyers Need to Know About Intangible Nexus and State Income Tax - Understanding the Impact of Recent State Supreme Court Decisions on Clients
The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence
The Instant Impact of Rederford v. U.S. Airways (1st Cir. Dec. 14, 2009) on Employment Lawyers and the Discharge of Employment Discrimination “Claims” in Bankruptcy
The Instant Impact of American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc. (Penn. Aug. 17, 2010) on Insurers' Ability to Recoup Defense Costs for Uninsured Claims
What Criminal Defense Lawyers Need to Know About Protecting Their Clients' Miranda Rights After Berghuis v. Thompkins (ExecSense Webinars)
The Instant Impact of LeBron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital (Ill. Feb. 4, 2010) on Health Care Lawyers and Caps on Medical Malpractice Awards for Noneconomic Damages
The Impact of Prowel v. Wise Business Forms, Inc. (3rd Cir. Aug. 28, 2009) on Gender Stereotype Discrimination and Homosexual Employees
The Instant Impact of Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson on ADR Lawyers and Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Agreements Expressly Assigning to Arbitration the “Gateway” Issue of the Enforceability of the Agreement to Arbitrate
The Instant Impact of New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board (U.S. June 17, 2010) on Labor/Employment Lawyers and the Hundreds of Decisions (and Their Precedential Effect) Issued by the NLRB Without Statutory Authority
|
|
|
|
