|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of Enbridge Energy Co. v. United States (5th Cir. Nov. 10, 2009) on Tax Lawyers & “Midco” Tax Shelters
ExecSense, Dec 2009, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Enbridge Energy Co. v. United States (5th Cir. Nov. 10, 2009) on Tax Lawyers & ‘Midco’ Tax Shelters” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as acquisitions using “midco” conduit entities may now risk being treated as straightforward stock purchase agreements for tax purposes.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and IRS challenges to acquisitions using “midco” conduit entities, Tamara Ashford, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Fifth Circuit’s ruling Enbridge Energy Co. v. U.S. on acquisitions using “midco” conduit entities
- Perspective on how acquisitions using “midco” conduit entities may now be analyzed to determine their legitimacy for tax purposes, and how this decision may impact IRS challenges that these acquisitions should be treated as straightforward stock purchase agreements
- The 10 questions being asked the most by tax lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
- Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
- If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
- Thorough, informative and interesting...an efficient, effective means of gaining in depth insight...” - Greg Nowak, Partner, Pepper Hamilton
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
The Instant Impact of Petaluma FX Partners LLC v. Commissioner (D.C. Cir. Jan. 12, 2010) on Tax Lawyers and Defining “Partnership Items” for Purposes of Tax Court Jurisdiction
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella (3rd Cir. July 27, 2010) on the Standard for Granting Preliminary Injunctions Against Employment by a Competitor Due to Potential Disclosure of Trade Secrets
The Instant Impact of City of Emeryville v. Sherwin Williams Company (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2010) on Contribution Protection Under CERCLA - What is the Value and is There a Way to Protect Settling Parties Against Future Suits
The Instant Impact of Smith v. Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and the Application of Mixed-Motive Liability to Title VII Retaliation Claims
The Instant Impact of Ansys, Inc. v. Computational Dynamics North America, Ltd. (1st Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and Drafting & Enforcing Noncompetition Agreements
The Instant Impact of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. (2nd Cir. Feb. 24, 2010) on Environmental Lawyers & Recovering Contribution Costs under CERCLA after Settling with State Environmental Authorities
The Instant Impact of the IRS's Apr. 5, 2010 Private Letter Ruling on the Tax Treatment of Credit Card Cash Rewards Donated to Charity
The Instant Impact of Rederford v. U.S. Airways (1st Cir. Dec. 14, 2009) on Employment Lawyers and the Discharge of Employment Discrimination “Claims” in Bankruptcy
|
|
|
|
