The Instant Impact on Insurance Lawyers of Baker v. Nat'l Interstate Ins. Co. (Cal. App. Jan. 11, 2010) on Products and Completed Hazards Exclusions and Negligent Service Claims

ExecSense, May 2010, Minutes: 60

“The Instant Impact on Insurance Lawyers of Baker v. Nat’l Interstate Ins. Co. (Cal. App. Jan 11, 2010) on Products and Completed Hazards Exclusions and Negligent Service Claims” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as courts may now find that the standard CGL products and completed hazards exclusion applies to negligence claims arising from services provided by the insured.

Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).

The webinar is led by an expert on the applicability of the products and completed hazards exclusion and other insurance issues, John Pitbaldo, and focuses on:

- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the California appellate court’s decision on products and completed hazards exclusions and negligent service claims

- Perspective on how the California appellate court’s decision may affect future court determinations of whether the products and completed hazards exclusion in a standard CGL policy applies to negligent services claims or only to traditional products liability claims, and on the manner in which future products and completed hazards exclusions are drafted

- The 10 questions being asked the most by insurance lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking

- Case studies of what other insurance lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling

Praise for ExecSense Webinars:

“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” - Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle

“A good resource for busy lawyers.” - Brett Heinrich, Partner, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP

“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” - Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson

John Pitblado

Customers who bought this item also bought

• The Instant Impact of Clarendon Amer. Ins. Co. v. StarNet Ins. Co. (Cal. App. July 27, 2010) on Determining Whether Pre-Litigation ADR Is a “Suit” for Purposes of Defense Coverage Under CGL Policies
• The Instant Impact of Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. (6th Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) On Construction Lawyers and the Scope of Defective-Workmanship Exclusions in General Contractor CGL Policies-
• The Instant Impact of Robinson-Smith v. Gov't Employees Ins. Co. (D.C. Cir. Jan. 5, 2010) on Employment Lawyers, Overtime Benefits, and FLSA Administrative Exemptions
• The Instant Impact of Endurance Amer. Spec. Ins. Co. v. Brown, Miclette, & Britt, Inc. (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers - Why Insurance Companies May Now be Required to Defend Lawsuits Arising from Ponzi Schemes and Securities Violations
• The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
• What Insurance Lawyers Need to Know About Chinese Drywall- Understanding the issues, the Latest Legal Developments, and What it Means for Your Clients
• The Instant Impact on Insurance Lawyers of Bausch & Lomb, Inc. v. Lexington Ins. Co. (W.D.N.Y. Dec. 28, 2009) on Aggregating Claims Arising from the Same Product Defect and the Definition of “Occurrence”
• The Instant Impact of American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc. (Penn. Aug. 17, 2010) on Insurers' Ability to Recoup Defense Costs for Uninsured Claims
• The Instant Impact of TMW Enterprises, Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co. (6th Cir. Aug. 25, 2010) on the Intersection of Exclusions and “Ensuing Loss” Coverage Provisions in All-Risk Policies
• The Instant Impact of Apple, Inc. v. Pystar Corp. (N.D. Cal. Nov. 13, 2009) on Copyright Infringement, Distribution Rights, and the First-Sale Doctrine for IP Lawyers