|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of Petaluma FX Partners LLC v. Commissioner (D.C. Cir. Jan. 12, 2010) on Tax Lawyers and Defining “Partnership Items” for Purposes of Tax Court Jurisdiction
ExecSense, June 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Petaluma FX Partners LLC v. Commissioner (D.C. Cir. Jan. 12, 2010) on Tax Lawyers and Defining ‘Partnership Items’ for Purposes of Tax Court Jurisdiction” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as what determinations the tax court has the jurisdiction to make in a partnership-level proceeding may now be analyzed very differently.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and partnership-level tax court proceedings, Rich Walton, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the D.C. Circuit’s ruling in Petaluma FX Partners LLC v. Commissioner on defining “partnership items” for purposes of tax court jurisdiction in partnership-level proceedings
- Perspective on what will now be considered to be a partnership-level determination going forward for purposes of tax court jurisdiction in partnership-level proceedings, and how this decision may impact the tax treatment of individual partners in future tax court proceedings in which the economic substance of the overall partnership is challenged
- The 10 questions being asked the most by tax lawyers and their clients with respect to how this will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” - Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“A good resource for busy lawyers.” - Brett Heinrich, Partner, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” - Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Chloe v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC (2nd Cir. Aug. 5, 2010) on Personal Jurisdiction and Future Trademark Infringement Litigation Against Internet Counterfeiters
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
The Instant Impact of Robinson-Smith v. Gov't Employees Ins. Co. (D.C. Cir. Jan. 5, 2010) on Employment Lawyers, Overtime Benefits, and FLSA Administrative Exemptions
The Instant Impact of Sabinsa Corp. v. Creative Compounds, LLC (3rd Cir. July 9, 2010) on "Likelihood of Confusion" Analysis in Trademark Infringement Litigation
The Instant Impact of In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LLC (3rd Cir. Mar. 22, 2010) on Bankruptcy Lawyers and a Secured Lender’s Right to Credit Bid at a Sale of Its Collateral
The Instant Impact of Narouz v. Charter Comm., LLC (9th Cir. Jan. 15, 2010) on Litigators and the Effect of Settling with the Class Representative on the Appealability of Class Certification Denial
The Instant Impact of Ansys, Inc. v. Computational Dynamics North America, Ltd. (1st Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and Drafting & Enforcing Noncompetition Agreements
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella (3rd Cir. July 27, 2010) on the Standard for Granting Preliminary Injunctions Against Employment by a Competitor Due to Potential Disclosure of Trade Secrets
The Instant Impact of City of Emeryville v. Sherwin Williams Company (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2010) on Contribution Protection Under CERCLA - What is the Value and is There a Way to Protect Settling Parties Against Future Suits
|
|
|
|
