|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact on Antitrust Lawyers of Allied Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Tyco Health Care Group LP (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2010) on Product Design Improvements and Market-Share Discounting Agreements
ExecSense, March 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact on Antitrust Lawyers of Allied Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Tyco Health Care Group LP (9th Cir. Jan. 6, 2010) on Product Design Improvements and Market-Share Discounting Agreements” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as courts may now analyze the anti-competitive effects of product design improvements, market-share discounting agreements, and sole-source agreements very differently.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and antitrust law, John Reilly, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Allied Orthopedic Appliances, Inc. v. Tyco Health Care Group LP on product design improvements and market-share discounting and sole-source agreements
- Perspective on how the Ninth Circuit’s decision may affect how future courts analyze whether a party has violated the antitrust laws through market-share discount or single-source agreements with customers, or by designing an improved patent-protected product incompatible with products manufactured by competitors
- The 10 questions being asked the most by antitrust lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other antitrust lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
“A good resource for busy lawyers.” - Brett Heinrich, Partner, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
The Instant Impact of Southeast Missouri Hospital v. Bard, Inc. (8th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Potential Antitrust Implications of Medical Supplier Contracts with Group Purchasing Organizations
The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly
The Instant Impact of PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Analysis of Vertical Price Fixing Agreements Under the Rule of Reason Framework
The Instant Impact of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Tabari (9th Cir. July 8, 2010) on the Nominative Fair Use Doctrine and Domain Names
The Instant Impact of Cal. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control v. Hearthside Residential Corp. (9th Cir. July 22, 2010) on the Date When “Owner and Operator” Status Is Determined Under CERCLA
The Instant Impact of City of Emeryville v. Sherwin Williams Company (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2010) on Contribution Protection Under CERCLA - What is the Value and is There a Way to Protect Settling Parties Against Future Suits
The Instant Impact of Narouz v. Charter Comm., LLC (9th Cir. Jan. 15, 2010) on Litigators and the Effect of Settling with the Class Representative on the Appealability of Class Certification Denial
The Instant Impact of the Intel-FTC Settlement on Increased Antitrust Enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act
The Instant Impact of Behrend v. Comcast Corp. (E.D. Penn. Jan. 7, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers, Expert Witnesses, and the Certification of Antitrust Class Actions
|
|
|
|
