- Published: December 2014
The Instant Impact of Endurance Amer. Spec. Ins. Co. v. Brown, Miclette, & Britt, Inc. (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers - Why Insurance Companies May Now be Required to Defend Lawsuits Arising from Ponzi Schemes and Securities Violations
- ID: 1208279
- March 2010
- 60 Minutes
“The Instant Impact of Endurance Amer. Spec. Ins. Co. v. Brown, Miclette, & Britt, Inc. (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Duty to Defend Lawsuits” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective insurance clients that could now have liability to defending lawsuits arising from Ponzi schemes and securities violations. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as insurance companies may now be required to defend lawsuits arising from Ponzi schemes and securities violations – even where coverage for such claims is expressly excluded in the insurance policy — if claims based on common-law negligence are also alleged.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and insurance coverage litigation, Mitchell Harris, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the district court’s decision in Endurance Amer. Spec. Ins. Co. v. Brown, Miclette, & Britt, Inc. on duty to defend lawsuits arising from Ponzi schemes and other securities violations
- Perspective on how the district court’s decision may affect how future courts analyze an insurer’s duty to defend lawsuit arising from Ponzi schemes and securities violations (even where there is an express exclusion), as well as the manner in which plaintiffs plead future lawsuits based on securities violations in order to have access to insurance proceeds
- The 10 questions being asked the most by insurance lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other insurance lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
“A good resource for busy lawyers.” - Brett Heinrich, Partner, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP SHOW LESS READ MORE >