|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
 |
 |
The Instant Impact of Ansys, Inc. v. Computational Dynamics North America, Ltd. (1st Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and Drafting & Enforcing Noncompetition Agreements
ExecSense, June 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Ansys, Inc. v. Computational Dynamics North America, Ltd. (1st Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and Drafting & Enforcing Noncompetition Agreements” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as requests by employers to enforce a noncompetition agreement and obtain a preliminary injunction enjoining an ex-employee from taking a new position at a competitor are facing increased scrutiny by the courts.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and noncompetition agreements, Dan Forman, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the First Circuit’s decision in Ansys, Inc. v. Computational Dynamics North America, Ltd. on the drafting and enforcement of noncompetition clauses in employment agreements
- Comprehensive overview of other recent court decisions on the standards for enforcing noncompetition agreements at the preliminary injunction stage (i.e., the stage when it is most critical that noncompetition agreements be enforced)
- Perspective on the impact of the First Circuit’s decision on the manner in which noncompetition clauses in employment agreements should be drafted, and the evidentiary showing required to convince a court to issue a preliminary injunction prohibiting a former employee from working for a competitor for the time period set out in the noncompetition clause
- Sample noncompetition language that has successfully been enforced by courts at the preliminary injunction stage (when combined with the necessary evidentiary showing)
- The 10 questions being asked the most by employment lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other employment lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
“A good resource for busy lawyers.” - Brett Heinrich, Partner, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” - Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” - Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella (3rd Cir. July 27, 2010) on the Standard for Granting Preliminary Injunctions Against Employment by a Competitor Due to Potential Disclosure of Trade Secrets
The Instant Impact of Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson on ADR Lawyers and Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Agreements Expressly Assigning to Arbitration the “Gateway” Issue of the Enforceability of the Agreement to Arbitrate
The Instant Impact of Hatmaker v. Memorial Med. Ctr. on the Level of Protection Applicable to an Employee's "Participation" in a Pre-EEOC Internal Harassment Investigation for Purposes of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Section
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of IUE-CWA Corp. v. Visteon Corp. (In re Visteon Corp.) (3rd Cir. July 13, 2010) on Bankruptcy Lawyers and the Termination of Retiree Benefits in Chapter 11
The Instant Impact of Smith v. Xerox Corp. (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and the Application of Mixed-Motive Liability to Title VII Retaliation Claims
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About Ames v. Home Depot (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2011)
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
The Instant Impact of Rederford v. U.S. Airways (1st Cir. Dec. 14, 2009) on Employment Lawyers and the Discharge of Employment Discrimination “Claims” in Bankruptcy
The Instant Impact of TMW Enterprises, Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co. (6th Cir. Aug. 25, 2010) on the Intersection of Exclusions and “Ensuing Loss” Coverage Provisions in All-Risk Policies
|
 |
|
|