|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact on Antitrust Lawyers and Their Clients of the Ticketmaster-Live Nation Merger
ExecSense, April 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact on Vertical Mergers of the DOJ’s Jan. 25 Approval of the Ticketmaster-Live Nation Merger” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this development and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of the DOJ’s approval by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss this development, as the DOJ’s approval of the Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger (and the conditions subject to which it was approved) provides important guidance as to how federal regulators may treat future proposed vertical mergers.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on this case and vertical mergers, David Goroff, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact on vertical mergers of the Department of Justice’s January 25, 2010 approval of the Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger
- Perspective on the impact of the DOJ’s approval (and the conditions for approval) of the Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger on future proposed vertical mergers, and how it may reflect federal regulators’ attitude towards and treatment of vertical mergers
- The 10 questions being asked the most by antitrust lawyers and their clients with respect to how this development will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other antitrust lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on the DOJ’s approval of the Ticketmaster-Live Nation merger
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
“A good resource for busy lawyers.” - Brett Heinrich, Partner, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of the Aug. 19 Final Revised FTC/DOJ Horizontal Merger Guidelines on Merger Antitrust Analysis for 2011
The Instant Impact of Behrend v. Comcast Corp. (E.D. Penn. Jan. 7, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers, Expert Witnesses, and the Certification of Antitrust Class Actions
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
The Instant Impact of PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Analysis of Vertical Price Fixing Agreements Under the Rule of Reason Framework
The Instant Impact of FTC v. Lundbeck Inc. (D. Minn Aug. 31, 2010) on the Continued Use of the Market Definition Analysis in Light of the Revised Horizontal Merger Guidelines
The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly
The Instant Impact of Southeast Missouri Hospital v. Bard, Inc. (8th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Potential Antitrust Implications of Medical Supplier Contracts with Group Purchasing Organizations
The Instant Impact of the Intel-FTC Settlement on Increased Antitrust Enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act
What Antitrust Lawyers Need to Know About the Proposed Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Pre-Notification Form Changes and the Potential Impact on Your Clients
What Antitrust Lawyers Need to Know About the DOJ's Settlement of its Complaint in U.S. V. Adobe Systems Inc, et al. and it's Implications for Businesses' recruiting and Hiring Processes
|
|
|
|
