|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of Colombia Opening Up Registration of “.co” Domain Names on IP Lawyers and Protecting Your Clients from Cybersquatters
ExecSense, April 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Colombia Opening Up Registration of ‘.co’ Domain Names on IP Lawyers and Protecting Your Clients from Cybersquatters” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this development and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this development by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss this development, as cybersquatters and typosquatters may now be able to register a “BRAND.co” domain name in Colombia using your clients’ trademarked brands and divert Internet traffic away from your clients’ websites unless you and your clients take proactive steps during the sunrise period.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by two experts on the ramifications of this development and cybersquatting/typosquatting, Arnie Hertz & Marc Trachtenberg, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of Colombia removing the restrictions for registration of third-level domain names, starting to offer second-level registration directly under “.co,” starting to market “.co” as a generic top-level domain, and what IP lawyers and their clients need to do during the sunrise period between April 26th and June 10th
- Perspective on the impact of Colombia opening up registration of “.co” domain names on trademark owners, the protection of brands, domain name registration in Colombia, cybersquatting/typosquatting, and the potential for Internet traffic being diverted from your clients’ “BRAND.com” websites to “BRAND.co” websites owned by typosquatters
- The 10 questions being asked the most by IP lawyers and their clients with respect to how this development will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other IP lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on Colombia opening up registration of “.co” domain names
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
“A good resource for busy lawyers.” - Brett Heinrich, Partner, Meckler Bulger Tilson Marick & Pearson LLP
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” - Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” - Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. v. Tabari (9th Cir. July 8, 2010) on the Nominative Fair Use Doctrine and Domain Names
What IP Lawyers Need to Know About the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
The Instant Impact of Chloe v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC (2nd Cir. Aug. 5, 2010) on Personal Jurisdiction and Future Trademark Infringement Litigation Against Internet Counterfeiters
The Instant Impact of Starr v. Sony BMG Entertainment (2nd Cir. Jan. 13, 2010) on Antitrust Lawyers and the Clarification of Post-Twombly Pleading Standards for Sherman Act Claims
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of Tiffany (NJ), Inc. v. eBay, Inc. (2nd Cir. Apr. 2, 2010) on IP Lawyers, Contributory Trademark Infringement, and the Online Sale of Counterfeit Goods
The Instant Impact of Papudesu v. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association of Rhode Island on Insurance Lawyers & The Right to Settle Language in Professional Liability Policies
The Instant Impact of Clarendon Amer. Ins. Co. v. StarNet Ins. Co. (Cal. App. July 27, 2010) on Determining Whether Pre-Litigation ADR Is a “Suit” for Purposes of Defense Coverage Under CGL Policies
The Impact of Global Warming on Insurance Lawyers & Their Clients
The Instant Impact of TMW Enterprises, Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co. (6th Cir. Aug. 25, 2010) on the Intersection of Exclusions and “Ensuing Loss” Coverage Provisions in All-Risk Policies
|
|
|
|
