International Benchmarks for University Departments of Economics & Finance

This unique report presents the results of a survey of 55 major departments of economics or finance from the United States, Australia, France, Italy, Austria, Germany, Korea, Spain, Switzerland, Taiwan, China, Brazil, the Czech Republic, Poland and other countries.

The 180+ page report presents data on a broad range of issues including budgets, salaries, personnel planning, departmental governance, student assessment, research plans, grants and other forms of support, tenure decisions and other critical issues.

The report also probes trends in enrollment in specific types of courses, with trend data for more than 12 categories of economics/finance classes including econometrics, mathematical methods, game theory, macro, micro and international economics, public finance, behavioral economics, industrial organization, healthcare economics and other categories and subject areas.

The report also tracks policies, budgets and spending on research institutes attached to economics departments and services offered by these departments to non-academic audiences including consultancy, classes for executives and special seminars.

In addition to data defining major trends in scholarship, research support and education, the report also provides practical management information on such topics as the financial support the departments receive for information technology and new faculty recruitment.

Data is broken out for U.S. programs, European programs, other developed countries, and developing countries. Data is also broken out by size of institution, size of economics/finance faculty, and type of college.

Just a few of the participating institutions were: the University of Maryland, the University of Melbourne, the University of Minnesota, Cornell University, Polytechnique, Sogang University, the Graduate Institute of Geneva, Chinese Culture University, Federal University of Pernambuco, Toulouse Business School, Universita di Turino, University of California Berkeley, and King Faisal University.

Some of the reports findings were that:

- In 36.59% of cases the department chairman was elected by the faculty and in 26.83% of cases he or she was appointed by the dean; in the remaining cases, some combination of these two methods was used. Elections were most common in Europe, accounting for more than 57% of cases; appointment by the dean was most common in developing countries, accounting for more than 57% of cases.

- More than 44% of departments surveyed planned to increase their efforts to attract international students. None said that they would be decreasing their efforts.

- Enrollment in courses in behavioral economics increased significantly over the past two years, particularly in Europe and in developing countries.

- The programs in the sample spent a mean of about $275,000 US for salaries and other forms of financial support for graduate students. The median was $185,700 and the range was $20,000 to $798, 617.

- A third of departments sampled offer seminars on economic policy developments or other issues to fee-paying, largely or partially non-academic audiences.

- The departments in the sample had a mean of 16.65 tenured faculty, only about a third of all faculty members; the median was 15.

- A third of the departments sampled have conducted ongoing meetings or formed a formal assessment committee within the past year. Once again European departments lagged all others in this respect and only 10% of European departments in the sample conducted such meetings or maintained a formal assessment committee.

LIST OF TABLES
PARTICIPANTS
THE QUESTIONNAIRE
SUMMARY OF MAIN FINDINGS
QUESTION ONE: WHAT IS THE TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT ENROLLMENT OF YOUR ENTIRE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY?
QUESTION TWO: HOW MANY TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
QUESTION THREE: HOW MANY ADJUNCT FACULTY DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE?
QUESTION FOUR: HOW MANY EMERITUS FACULTY DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE?
QUESTION FIVE: HOW MANY TENURED FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
QUESTION SIX: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
QUESTION SEVEN: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) NOT ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
QUESTION EIGHT: HOW MANY TEACHING ASSOCIATES OR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
QUESTION NINE: WHAT IS THE TOTAL BUDGET (EXCLUDING STAFF SALARIES FOR FACULTY) ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR?
QUESTION TEN: HOW MUCH DID YOUR COLLEGE PAY FOR THE AGGREGATED SALARIES FOR ALL FULL TIME FACULTY IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR?QUESTION ELEVEN: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT NEXT YEAR?
QUESTION TWELVE: HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FOR YOUR DEPARTMENT'S BUDGET IN THE NEXT YEAR?
QUESTION THIRTEEN: OVER THE PAST FIVE YEARS HAS THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET CHANGED. IN WHAT AREAS HAS EXPENDITURE GROWN OR DECLINED MOST?
QUESTION FOURTEEN: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OPERATE ANY FORM OF ECONOMIC CONSULTANCY OR DEPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION THAT CHARGES FEES FOR ECONOMIC ADVICE OR ASSISTANCE?
QUESTION FIFTEEN: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER SEMINARS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS OR POLICY ISSUES TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON ACADEMIC AUDIENCE?
QUESTION SIXTEEN: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER REPORTS, INFORMATION SERVICES OR OTHER TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS AIMED AT A FEE-PAYING AUDIENCE TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE?
QUESTION SEVENTEEN: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR EXECUTIVES?
QUESTION EIGHTEEN: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR OTHER FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCES?
QUESTION NINETEEN: DESCRIBE YOUR DEPARTMENT'S STUDENT & INSTRUCTOR EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT EFFORTS. HAVE YOU EXPANDED OR ALTERED THESE EFFORTS IN RECENT YEARS?
QUESTION TWENTY: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EXIT INTERVIEWS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
QUESTION TWENTY-ONE: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ALUMNI INTERVIEWS OR SURVEYS TO DETERMINE AFTER DEGREE LEVELS OF SUCCESS AS ASSESSMENT MEASURES IN THE PAST YEAR?
QUESTION TWENTY-TWO: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?QUESTION TWENTY-THREE: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED DEPARTMENTAL OBSERVATION AND EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS ASSESSMENT MEASURES IN THE PAST YEAR?
QUESTION TWENTY-FOUR: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STANDARDIZED TESTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PROGRAM AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
QUESTION TWENTY-FIVE: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ONGOING MEETINGS OR FORMED A FORMAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
QUESTION TWENTY-SIX: WHAT HAVE BEEN THE TRENDS IN ENROLLMENT IN YOUR DEPARTMENT IN RECENT YEARS? DO YOU EXPECT INCREASES OR DECREASES IN ENROLLMENT IN THE NEAR FUTURE? HAVE CERTAIN SUBJECT AREAS BECOME MORE OR LESS POPULAR? ARE YOU GETTING INCREASED OR DECREASED ENROLLMENT FROM NON-MAJORS? (OR FROM OTHER SCHOOLS FOR MBA AND OTHER GRADUATE PROGRAMS?)
QUESTION TWENTY-SEVEN: HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE MAJORING IN ECONOMICS OR FINANCE AT YOUR COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY?
QUESTION TWENTY-EIGHT: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMIC HISTORY OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION TWENTY-NINE: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MACROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MICROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-ONE: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-TWO: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN LABOR ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-THREE: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-FOUR: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN DEVELOPMENTAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-FIVE: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION / LAW & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-SIX: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CALCULUS, STATISTICS & MATHEMATICAL METHODS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-SEVEN: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MONEY & BANKING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-EIGHT: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CORPORATE FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION THIRTY-NINE: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION FORTY: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN PUBLIC FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION FORTY-ONE: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN GAME THEORY & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION FORTY-TWO: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMETRICS & FORECASTING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
QUESTION FORTY-THREE: HOW MANY INDIVIDUAL COURSES DID THE DEPARTMENT OFFER IN THE PAST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR, INCLUDING COURSES ONLY OFFERED IN ONE SEMESTER?
QUESTION FORTY-FOUR: IF THE DEPARTMENT OFFERS AN MA OR PHD PROGRAM HOW MUCH WAS AVAILABLE TO THE PROGRAM IN THE PAST YEAR TO SPEND ON SALARIES AND OTHER FORMS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS?
QUESTION FORTY-FIVE: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR DEPARTMENTAL PLANS TO ATTRACT INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS?
QUESTION FORTY-SIX: DOES THE DEPARTMENT SPONSOR, UNIQUELY OR JOINTLY, ANY INSTITUTES DEVOTED TO PARTICULAR SUBJECT MATTER, PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OR OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST?
QUESTION FORTY-SEVEN: IF SO, WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE INSTITUTE OR INSTITUTES, AND WHAT IS ITS PRIMARY FOCUS?
QUESTION FORTY-EIGHT: DOES THE INSTITUTE (INSTITUTES) HAVE ITS OWN PUBLISHING IMPRINT OR SERIES?
QUESTION FORTY-NINE: IF SOME PART OF THE TOTAL BUDGET OF THE INSTITUTE (OR INSTITUTES) COMES FROM GRANTS, ENDOWMENTS, GIFTS OR OTHER SOURCES THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE GENERAL COLLEGE OR DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET, WHAT IS PERCENTAGE OF IT?
QUESTION FIFTY: COMPARED TO FIVE YEARS AGO, WHAT HAS BEEN THE APPROXIMATE TOTAL INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL SPENDING ON INSTITUTES, COUNCILS, RESEARCH CENTERS AND OTHER SUCH ORGANIZATION SPONSORED BY OR CONNECTED TO THE DEPARTMENT?
QUESTION FIFTY-ONE: THE WORLD HAS RECENTLY EXPERIENCED AN UNUSUALLY SEVERE DECLINE IN ECONOMIC ACTIVITY WHICH SOME HAVE COMPARED TO THE ADVENT OF THE WORLD ECONOMIC CONTRACTION OF THE 1930'S. HOW HAS THIS DEVELOPMENT IMPACTED YOUR PROGRAM'S RESEARCH FOCUS, HIRING PLANS, AND GENERAL STRATEGIC FOCUS?
QUESTION FIFTY-TWO: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DEPARTMENT HEAD OR CHAIR?
QUESTION FIFTY-THREE: HOW THE DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IS SELECTED
QUESTION FIFTY-FOUR: TRUE POWER TO REMOVE A DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IN YOUR DEPARTMENT LIES WITH…
QUESTION FIFTY-FIVE: DOES THE DEPARTMENT EVER OFFER "A FREE LUNCH" TO PARTICIPANTS IN TALKS, SPECIAL LECTURES OR OTHER FORMAL OR INFORMAL EVENTS WHERE FACULTY GENERALLY OFFER INSIGHTS, COMMENTARY OR GLIMPSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS TO OTHER FACULTY OR THE BROADER PUBLIC?
QUESTION FIFTY-SIX: IN YOUR ESTIMATION THE ACCEPTANCE RATES (NOT QUANTITY OF PUBLICATIONS) FOR SUBMISSIONS TO SCHOLARLY JOURNALS FOR FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS HAS…
QUESTION FIFTY-SEVEN: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY ITSELF, OR FROM A BUDGETARY AUTHORITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLEGE, SUCH AS A STATE OR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OR ENDOWMENT, TO GIVE GRANTS TO ITS FACULTY MEMBERS TO SUPPORT RESEARCH?
QUESTION FIFTY-EIGHT: IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUCH SUPPORT AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRIOR QUESTION, HOW MUCH SUCH SUPPORT WILL IT RECEIVE IN THE 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR?
QUESTION FIFTY-NINE: IN YOUR VIEW ACCEPTANCE RATES FOR GRANT APPLICATIONS BY FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE…
QUESTION SIXTY: IF YOUR DEPARTMENT HAS MADE A MAJOR CHANGE IN RESEARCH DIRECTION OR FOCUS IN THE PAST TWO YEARS, OR PLANS TO MAKE SUCH A CHANGE OVER THE NEXT TWO YEARS, BRIEFLY DESCRIBE THE CHANGE IN STRATEGIC DIRECTION. WHICH AREAS OF RESEARCH DO YOU PLAN TO EMPHASIZEAND WHY? HOW WILL THIS CHANGE IN DIRECTION BE MANIFESTED?
QUESTION SIXTY-ONE: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SOME FORM OF ALLOCATION OR ALLOWANCE FROM THE LIBRARY, OR DIRECT INFLUENCE OVER A PORTION OF THE LIBRARY BUDGET, FOR JOURNAL AND DATABASE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND OTHER RESOURCES IN ECONOMICS AND/OR FINANCE?
QUESTION SIXTY-TWO: IF SO, WHAT WAS THIS AMOUNT IN THE 2008-09 ACADEMIC YEAR?
QUESTION SIXTY-THREE: DOES THE DEPARTMENT CONTRIBUTE OR ARCHIVE JOURNAL ARTICLES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE DEPARTMENT'S FACULTY TO A DIGITAL REPOSITORY MAINTAINED BY THE COLLEGE LIBRARY?
QUESTION SIXTY-FOUR: HAS THE DEPARTMENT EVER CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF A MAJOR DATABASE OR JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION IN ECONOMICS / FINANCE FOR THE LIBRARY THAT THE LIBRARY WOULD OTHERWISE BE UNABLE TO AFFORD WITHOUT THE DEPARTMENTS' FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE?
QUESTION SIXTY-FIVE: WHAT WERE THE DEPARTMENT'S COSTS IN THE PAST YEAR FOR EXPENSES RELATING TO RECRUITING NEW FACULTY?
QUESTION SIXTY-SIX: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE DEPARTMENT'S TOTAL COSTS FOR SUCH RECRUITMENT IN THE UPCOMING YEAR?
QUESTION SIXTY-SEVEN: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN TENURED OR TENURE TRACK FACULTY OVER THE NEXT YEAR?
QUESTION SIXTY-EIGHT: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) OVER THE NEXT YEAR?
QUESTION SIXTY-NINE: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COURSE LOAD IN YOUR DEPARTMENT IS ACCOUNTED FOR BY ADJUNCT FACULTY?
QUESTION SEVENTY: HOW MANY FULL TIME EQUIVALENT SECRETARIAL OR SUPPORT FUNCTION POSITIONS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE DEPARTMENT PER YEAR?
QUESTION SEVENTY-ONE: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A SPECIFIC BUDGET OR A LINE ITEM ON THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DEPARTMENT?
QUESTION SEVENTY-TWO: HOW MUCH DID THE DEPARTMENT SPEND FOR COMPUTERS, XEROX MACHINES, FAX MACHINES AND OTHER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIFICALLY FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE IN THE PAST YEAR?

LIST OF TABLES
TABLE 1.1: WHAT IS THE TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT ENROLLMENT OF YOUR ENTIRE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY?
TABLE 1.2: WHAT IS THE TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT ENROLLMENT OF YOUR ENTIRE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 1.3: WHAT IS THE TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT ENROLLMENT OF YOUR ENTIRE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 1.4: WHAT IS THE TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT ENROLLMENT OF YOUR ENTIRE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 1.5: WHAT IS THE TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT ENROLLMENT OF YOUR ENTIRE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 2.1: HOW MANY TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
TABLE 2.2: HOW MANY TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 2.3: HOW MANY TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 2.4: HOW MANY TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 2.5: HOW MANY TOTAL FULL TIME EQUIVALENT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 3.1: HOW MANY ADJUNCT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
TABLE 3.2: HOW MANY ADJUNCT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 3.3: HOW MANY ADJUNCT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 3.4: HOW MANY ADJUNCT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 3.5: HOW MANY ADJUNCT FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 4.1: HOW MANY EMERITUS FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
TABLE 4.2: HOW MANY EMERITUS FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 4.3: HOW MANY EMERITUS FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 4.4: HOW MANY EMERITUS FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 4.5: HOW MANY EMERITUS FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 5.1: HOW MANY TENURED FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
TABLE 5.2: HOW MANY TENURED FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 5.3: HOW MANY TENURED FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 5.4: HOW MANY TENURED FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 5.5: HOW MANY TENURED FACULTY DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 6.1: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
TABLE 6.2: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 6.3: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 6.4: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 6.5: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 7.1: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) NOT ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
TABLE 7.2: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) NOT ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 7.3: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) NOT ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 7.4: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) NOT ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 7.5: HOW MANY NON-TENURED FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) NOT ON A TENURE TRACK DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 8.1: HOW MANY TEACHING ASSOCIATES OR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE?
TABLE 8.2: HOW MANY TEACHING ASSOCIATES OR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 8.3: HOW MANY TEACHING ASSOCIATES OR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 8.4: HOW MANY TEACHING ASSOCIATES OR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 8.5: HOW MANY TEACHING ASSOCIATES OR RESEARCH ASSOCIATES DOES YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 9.1: WHAT IS THE TOTAL BUDGET (EXCLUDING STAFF SALARIES FOR FACULTY) ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR?
TABLE 9.2: WHAT IS THE TOTAL BUDGET (EXCLUDING STAFF SALARIES FOR FACULTY) ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 9.3: WHAT IS THE TOTAL BUDGET (EXCLUDING STAFF SALARIES FOR FACULTY) ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 9.4: WHAT IS THE TOTAL BUDGET (EXCLUDING STAFF SALARIES FOR FACULTY) ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 9.5: WHAT IS THE TOTAL BUDGET (EXCLUDING STAFF SALARIES FOR FACULTY) ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 10.1: HOW MUCH DID YOUR COLLEGE PAY FOR THE AGGREGATED SALARIES FOR ALL FULL TIME FACULTY IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR?
TABLE 10.2: HOW MUCH DID YOUR COLLEGE PAY FOR THE AGGREGATED SALARIES FOR ALL FULL TIME FACULTY IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 10.3: HOW MUCH DID YOUR COLLEGE PAY FOR THE AGGREGATED SALARIES FOR ALL FULL TIME FACULTY IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 10.4: HOW MUCH DID YOUR COLLEGE PAY FOR THE AGGREGATED SALARIES FOR ALL FULL TIME FACULTY IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 10.5: HOW MUCH DID YOUR COLLEGE PAY FOR THE AGGREGATED SALARIES FOR ALL FULL TIME FACULTY IN 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 11.1: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT NEXT YEAR?
TABLE 11.2: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 11.3: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 11.4: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 11.5: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATED TO YOUR DEPARTMENT NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 12.1: HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FOR YOUR DEPARTMENT’S BUDGET IN THE NEXT YEAR?
TABLE 12.2: HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FOR YOUR DEPARTMENT’S BUDGET IN THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 12.3: HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FOR YOUR DEPARTMENT’S BUDGET IN THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 12.4: HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FOR YOUR DEPARTMENT’S BUDGET IN THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 12.5: HOW WOULD YOU CHARACTERIZE THE FINANCIAL OUTLOOK FOR YOUR DEPARTMENT’S BUDGET IN THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 14.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OPERATE ANY FORM OF ECONOMIC CONSULTANCY OR DEPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION THAT CHARGES FEES FOR ECONOMIC ADVICE OR ASSISTANCE?
TABLE 14.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OPERATE ANY FORM OF ECONOMIC CONSULTANCY OR DEPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION THAT CHARGES FEES FOR ECONOMIC ADVICE OR ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 14.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OPERATE ANY FORM OF ECONOMIC CONSULTANCY OR DEPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION THAT CHARGES FEES FOR ECONOMIC ADVICE OR ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 14.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OPERATE ANY FORM OF ECONOMIC CONSULTANCY OR DEPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION THAT CHARGES FEES FOR ECONOMIC ADVICE OR ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 14.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OPERATE ANY FORM OF ECONOMIC CONSULTANCY OR DEPARTMENTAL ORGANIZATION THAT CHARGES FEES FOR ECONOMIC ADVICE OR ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 15.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER SEMINARS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS OR POLICY ISSUES TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE?
TABLE 15.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER SEMINARS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS OR POLICY ISSUES TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 15.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER SEMINARS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS OR POLICY ISSUES TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 15.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER SEMINARS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS OR POLICY ISSUES TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 15.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER SEMINARS ON ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS OR POLICY ISSUES TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 16.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER REPORTS, INFORMATION SERVICES OR OTHER TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS AIMED AT A FEE-PAYING AUDIENCE TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE?
TABLE 16.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER REPORTS, INFORMATION SERVICES OR OTHER TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS AIMED AT A FEE-PAYING AUDIENCE LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 16.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER REPORTS, INFORMATION SERVICES OR OTHER TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS AIMED AT A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 16.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER REPORTS, INFORMATION SERVICES OR OTHER TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS AIMED AT A FEE-PAYING AUDIENCE TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 16.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER REPORTS, INFORMATION SERVICES OR OTHER TYPES OF PUBLICATIONS AIMED AT A FEE-PAYING AUDIENCE TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 17.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR EXECUTIVES?
TABLE 17.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR EXECUTIVES, BUSINESSMEN TO A FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 17.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR EXECUTIVES? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 17.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR EXECUTIVES? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 18.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR EXECUTIVES? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 18.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR OTHER FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCES?
TABLE 18.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR OTHER FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCES? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 18.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR OTHER FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCES? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 18.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR OTHER FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCES? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 18.6: DOES THE DEPARTMENT OFFER COURSES DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR OTHER FEE-PAYING, LARGELY OR PARTIALLY NON-ACADEMIC AUDIENCES? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 20.1: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EXIT INTERVIEWS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
TABLE 20.2: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EXIT INTERVIEWS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 20.3: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EXIT INTERVIEWS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 20.4: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EXIT INTERVIEWS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 20.5: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EXIT INTERVIEWS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 21.1: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ALUMNI INTERVIEWS OR SURVEYS TO DETERMINE AFTER DEGREE LEVELS OF SUCCESS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
TABLE 21.2: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ALUMNI INTERVIEWS OR SURVEYS TO DETERMINE AFTER DEGREE LEVELS OF SUCCESS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 21.3: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ALUMNI INTERVIEWS OR SURVEYS TO DETERMINE AFTER DEGREE LEVELS OF SUCCESS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 21.4: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ALUMNI INTERVIEWS OR SURVEYS TO DETERMINE AFTER DEGREE LEVELS OF SUCCESS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 21.5: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ALUMNI INTERVIEWS OR SURVEYS TO DETERMINE AFTER DEGREE LEVELS OF SUCCESS AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 22.1: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
TABLE 22.2: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 22.3: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 22.4: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 22.5: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STUDENT EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 23.1: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED DEPARTMENTAL OBSERVATION AND EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
TABLE 23.2: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED DEPARTMENTAL OBSERVATION AND EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 23.3: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED DEPARTMENTAL OBSERVATION AND EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 23.4: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED DEPARTMENTAL OBSERVATION AND EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 23.5: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED DEPARTMENTAL OBSERVATION AND EVALUATION OF FACULTY AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 24.1: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STANDARDIZED TESTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PROGRAM AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
TABLE 24.2: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STANDARDIZED TESTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PROGRAM AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 24.3: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STANDARDIZED TESTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PROGRAM AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 24.4: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STANDARDIZED TESTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PROGRAM AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 24.5: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED STANDARDIZED TESTING OF STUDENTS IN THE PROGRAM AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 25.1: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ONGOING MEETING OR FORMATION OF A FORMAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR?
TABLE 25.2: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ONGOING MEETING OR FORMATION OF A FORMAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 25.3: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ONGOING MEETING OR FORMATION OF A FORMAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 25.4: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ONGOING MEETING OR FORMATION OF A FORMAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 25.5: HAS THE DEPARTMENT CONDUCTED ONGOING MEETING OR FORMATION OF A FORMAL ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE AS AN ASSESSMENT MEASURE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 27.1: HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE MAJORING IN ECONOMICS OR FINANCE AT YOUR COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY?
TABLE 27.2: HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE MAJORING IN ECONOMICS OR FINANCE AT YOUR COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 27.3: HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE MAJORING IN ECONOMICS OR FINANCE AT YOUR COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 27.4: HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE MAJORING IN ECONOMICS OR FINANCE AT YOUR COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 27.5: HOW MANY STUDENTS ARE MAJORING IN ECONOMICS OR FINANCE AT YOUR COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 28.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMIC HISTORY OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 28.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMIC HISTORY OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 28.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMIC HISTORY OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 28.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMIC HISTORY OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 28.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMIC HISTORY OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 29.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MACROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 29.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MACROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 29.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MACROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 29.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MACROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 29.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MACROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 30.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MICROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 30.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MICROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 30.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MICROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 30.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MICROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 30.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MICROECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 31.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 31.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 31.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 31.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 31.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 32.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN LABOR ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 32.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN LABOR ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 32.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN LABOR ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 32.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN LABOR ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 32.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN LABOR ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 33.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 33.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 33.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 33.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 33.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN HEALTHCARE ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 34.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN DEVELOPMENTAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 34.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN DEVELOPMENTAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 34.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN DEVELOPMENTAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 34.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN DEVELOPMENTAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 34.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN DEVELOPMENTAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 35.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION / LAW & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 35.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION / LAW & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 35.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION / LAW & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 35.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION / LAW & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 35.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN INDUSTRIAL ORGANIZATION / LAW & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.

TABLE 36.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CALCULUS, STATISTICS & MATHEMATICAL METHODS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 36.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CALCULUS, STATISTICS & MATHEMATICAL METHODS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 36.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CALCULUS, STATISTICS & MATHEMATICAL METHODS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 36.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CALCULUS, STATISTICS & MATHEMATICAL METHODS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 36.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CALCULUS, STATISTICS & MATHEMATICAL METHODS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 37.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MONEY & BANKING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 37.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MONEY & BANKING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 37.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MONEY & BANKING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 37.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MONEY & BANKING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 37.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN MONEY & BANKING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 38.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CORPORATE FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 38.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CORPORATE FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 38.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CORPORATE FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 38.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CORPORATE FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 38.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN CORPORATE FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 39.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 39.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 39.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 39.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 39.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 40.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN PUBLIC FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 40.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN PUBLIC FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 40.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN PUBLIC FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 40.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN PUBLIC FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 40.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN PUBLIC FINANCE OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 41.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN GAME THEORY & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 41.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN GAME THEORY & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 41.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN GAME THEORY & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 41.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN GAME THEORY & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 41.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN GAME THEORY & ECONOMICS OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 42.1: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMETRICS & FORECASTING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS.
TABLE 42.2: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMETRICS & FORECASTING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 42.3: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMETRICS & FORECASTING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 42.4: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMETRICS & FORECASTING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 42.5: TREND IN ENROLLMENT IN ECONOMETRICS & FORECASTING OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS, BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 43.1: HOW MANY INDIVIDUAL COURSES DID THE DEPARTMENT OFFER IN THE PAST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR, INCLUDING COURSES ONLY OFFERED IN ONE SEMESTER?
TABLE 43.2: HOW MANY INDIVIDUAL COURSES DID THE DEPARTMENT OFFER IN THE PAST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR, INCLUDING COURSES ONLY OFFERED IN ONE SEMESTER? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 43.3: HOW MANY INDIVIDUAL COURSES DID THE DEPARTMENT OFFER IN THE PAST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR, INCLUDING COURSES ONLY OFFERED IN ONE SEMESTER? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 43.4: HOW MANY INDIVIDUAL COURSES DID THE DEPARTMENT OFFER IN THE PAST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR, INCLUDING COURSES ONLY OFFERED IN ONE SEMESTER? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 43.5: HOW MANY INDIVIDUAL COURSES DID THE DEPARTMENT OFFER IN THE PAST FULL ACADEMIC YEAR, INCLUDING COURSES ONLY OFFERED IN ONE SEMESTER? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 44.1: IF THE DEPARTMENT OFFERS AN MA OR PHD PROGRAM HOW MUCH WAS AVAILABLE TO THE PROGRAM IN THE PAST YEAR TO SPEND ON SALARIES AND OTHER FORMS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS?
TABLE 44.2: IF THE DEPARTMENT OFFERS AN MA OR PHD PROGRAM HOW MUCH WAS AVAILABLE TO THE PROGRAM IN THE PAST YEAR TO SPEND ON SALARIES AND OTHER FORMS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 44.3: IF THE DEPARTMENT OFFERS AN MA OR PHD PROGRAM HOW MUCH WAS AVAILABLE TO THE PROGRAM IN THE PAST YEAR TO SPEND ON SALARIES AND OTHER FORMS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 44.4: IF THE DEPARTMENT OFFERS AN MA OR PHD PROGRAM HOW MUCH WAS AVAILABLE TO THE PROGRAM IN THE PAST YEAR TO SPEND ON SALARIES AND OTHER FORMS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 44.5: IF THE DEPARTMENT OFFERS AN MA OR PHD PROGRAM HOW MUCH WAS AVAILABLE TO THE PROGRAM IN THE PAST YEAR TO SPEND ON SALARIES AND OTHER FORMS OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 45.1: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR DEPARTMENTAL PLANS TO ATTRACT INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS?
TABLE 45.2: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR DEPARTMENTAL PLANS TO ATTRACT INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 45.3: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR DEPARTMENTAL PLANS TO ATTRACT INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 45.4: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR DEPARTMENTAL PLANS TO ATTRACT INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 45.5: HOW WOULD YOU DESCRIBE YOUR DEPARTMENTAL PLANS TO ATTRACT INTERNATIONAL STUDENTS OVER THE NEXT FEW YEARS? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 46.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT SPONSOR, UNIQUELY OR JOINTLY, ANY INSTITUTES DEVOTED TO PARTICULAR SUBJECT MATTER, PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OR OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST?
TABLE 46.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT SPONSOR, UNIQUELY OR JOINTLY, ANY INSTITUTES DEVOTED TO PARTICULAR SUBJECT MATTER, PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OR OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 46.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT SPONSOR, UNIQUELY OR JOINTLY, ANY INSTITUTES DEVOTED TO PARTICULAR SUBJECT MATTER, PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OR OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 46.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT SPONSOR, UNIQUELY OR JOINTLY, ANY INSTITUTES DEVOTED TO PARTICULAR SUBJECT MATTER, PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OR OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 46.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT SPONSOR, UNIQUELY OR JOINTLY, ANY INSTITUTES DEVOTED TO PARTICULAR SUBJECT MATTER, PERSPECTIVES, PROBLEMS, GEOGRAPHIC AREAS OR OTHER TOPICS OF INTEREST? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 48.1: DOES THE INSTITUTE (INSTITUTES) HAVE ITS OWN PUBLISHING IMPRINT OR SERIES?
TABLE 48.2: DOES THE INSTITUTE (INSTITUTES) HAVE ITS OWN PUBLISHING IMPRINT OR SERIES? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 48.3: DOES THE INSTITUTE (INSTITUTES) HAVE ITS OWN PUBLISHING IMPRINT OR SERIES? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 48.4: DOES THE INSTITUTE (INSTITUTES) HAVE ITS OWN PUBLISHING IMPRINT OR SERIES? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 48.5: DOES THE INSTITUTE (INSTITUTES) HAVE ITS OWN PUBLISHING IMPRINT OR SERIES? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 49.1: IF SOME PART OF THE TOTAL BUDGET OF THE INSTITUTE (OR INSTITUTES) COMES FROM GRANTS, ENDOWMENTS, GIFTS OR OTHER SOURCES THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE GENERAL COLLEGE OR DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET, WHAT IS PERCENTAGE OF IT?
TABLE 49.2: IF SOME PART OF THE TOTAL BUDGET OF THE INSTITUTE (OR INSTITUTES) COMES FROM GRANTS, ENDOWMENTS, GIFTS OR OTHER SOURCES THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE GENERAL COLLEGE OR DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET, WHAT IS PERCENTAGE OF IT? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 49.3: IF SOME PART OF THE TOTAL BUDGET OF THE INSTITUTE (OR INSTITUTES) COMES FROM GRANTS, ENDOWMENTS, GIFTS OR OTHER SOURCES THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE GENERAL COLLEGE OR DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET, WHAT IS PERCENTAGE OF IT? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 49.4: IF SOME PART OF THE TOTAL BUDGET OF THE INSTITUTE (OR INSTITUTES) COMES FROM GRANTS, ENDOWMENTS, GIFTS OR OTHER SOURCES THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE GENERAL COLLEGE OR DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET, WHAT IS PERCENTAGE OF IT? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 49.5: IF SOME PART OF THE TOTAL BUDGET OF THE INSTITUTE (OR INSTITUTES) COMES FROM GRANTS, ENDOWMENTS, GIFTS OR OTHER SOURCES THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE GENERAL COLLEGE OR DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET, WHAT IS PERCENTAGE OF IT? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 50.1: COMPARED TO FIVE YEARS AGO, WHAT HAS BEEN THE APPROXIMATE TOTAL INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL SPENDING ON INSTITUTES, COUNCILS, RESEARCH CENTERS AND OTHER SUCH ORGANIZATION SPONSORED BY OR CONNECTED TO THE DEPARTMENT?
TABLE 50.2: COMPARED TO FIVE YEARS AGO, WHAT HAS BEEN THE APPROXIMATE TOTAL INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL SPENDING ON INSTITUTES, COUNCILS, RESEARCH CENTERS AND OTHER SUCH ORGANIZATION SPONSORED BY OR CONNECTED TO THE DEPARTMENT? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 50.3: COMPARED TO FIVE YEARS AGO, WHAT HAS BEEN THE APPROXIMATE TOTAL INCREASE OR DECREASE IN TOTAL SPENDING ON INSTITUTES, COUNCILS, RESEARCH CENTERS AND OTHER SUCH ORGANIZATION SPONSORED BY OR CONNECTED TO THE DEPARTMENT? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.

TABLE 52.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DEPARTMENT HEAD OR CHAIR?
TABLE 52.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DEPARTMENT HEAD OR CHAIR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 52.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DEPARTMENT HEAD OR CHAIR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 52.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DEPARTMENT HEAD OR CHAIR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 52.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A DEPARTMENT HEAD OR CHAIR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 53.1: HOW THE DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IS SELECTED
TABLE 53.2: HOW THE DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IS SELECTED? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 53.3: HOW THE DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IS SELECTED? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 53.4: HOW THE DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IS SELECTED? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 53.5: HOW THE DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IS SELECTED? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 54.1: TRUE POWER TO REMOVE A DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IN YOUR DEPARTMENT LIES WITH…
TABLE 54.2: TRUE POWER TO REMOVE A DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IN YOUR DEPARTMENT LIES WITH… BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 54.3: TRUE POWER TO REMOVE A DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IN YOUR DEPARTMENT LIES WITH… BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 54.4: TRUE POWER TO REMOVE A DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IN YOUR DEPARTMENT LIES WITH… BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 54.5: TRUE POWER TO REMOVE A DEPARTMENT CHAIRMAN IN YOUR DEPARTMENT LIES WITH… BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 55.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT EVER OFFER “A FREE LUNCH” TO PARTICIPANTS IN TALKS, SPECIAL LECTURES OR OTHER FORMAL OR INFORMAL EVENTS WHERE FACULTY GENERALLY OFFER INSIGHTS, COMMENTARY OR GLIMPSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS TO OTHER FACULTY OR THE BROADER PUBLIC?
TABLE 55.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT EVER OFFER “A FREE LUNCH” TO PARTICIPANTS IN TALKS, SPECIAL LECTURES OR OTHER FORMAL OR INFORMAL EVENTS WHERE FACULTY GENERALLY OFFER INSIGHTS, COMMENTARY OR GLIMPSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS TO OTHER FACULTY OR THE BROADER PUBLIC? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 55.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT EVER OFFER “A FREE LUNCH” TO PARTICIPANTS IN TALKS, SPECIAL LECTURES OR OTHER FORMAL OR INFORMAL EVENTS WHERE FACULTY GENERALLY OFFER INSIGHTS, COMMENTARY OR GLIMPSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS TO OTHER FACULTY OR THE BROADER PUBLIC? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 55.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT EVER OFFER “A FREE LUNCH” TO PARTICIPANTS IN TALKS, SPECIAL LECTURES OR OTHER FORMAL OR INFORMAL EVENTS WHERE FACULTY GENERALLY OFFER INSIGHTS, COMMENTARY OR GLIMPSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS TO OTHER FACULTY OR THE BROADER PUBLIC? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 55.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT EVER OFFER “A FREE LUNCH” TO PARTICIPANTS IN TALKS, SPECIAL LECTURES OR OTHER FORMAL OR INFORMAL EVENTS WHERE FACULTY GENERALLY OFFER INSIGHTS, COMMENTARY OR GLIMPSES OF RESEARCH RESULTS TO OTHER FACULTY OR THE BROADER PUBLIC? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 56.1: IN YOUR ESTIMATION THE ACCEPTANCE RATES (NOT QUANTITY OF PUBLICATIONS) FOR SUBMISSIONS TO SCHOLARLY JOURNALS FOR FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS HAS…
TABLE 56.2: IN YOUR ESTIMATION THE ACCEPTANCE RATES (NOT QUANTITY OF PUBLICATIONS) FOR SUBMISSIONS TO SCHOLARLY JOURNALS FOR FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS HAS… BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 56.3: IN YOUR ESTIMATION THE ACCEPTANCE RATES (NOT QUANTITY OF PUBLICATIONS) FOR SUBMISSIONS TO SCHOLARLY JOURNALS FOR FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS HAS… BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 56.4: IN YOUR ESTIMATION THE ACCEPTANCE RATES (NOT QUANTITY OF PUBLICATIONS) FOR SUBMISSIONS TO SCHOLARLY JOURNALS FOR FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS HAS… BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 56.5: IN YOUR ESTIMATION THE ACCEPTANCE RATES (NOT QUANTITY OF PUBLICATIONS) FOR SUBMISSIONS TO SCHOLARLY JOURNALS FOR FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT OVER THE PAST TWO YEARS HAS… BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 57.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY ITSELF, OR FROM A BUDGETARY AUTHORITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLEGE, SUCH AS A STATE OR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OR ENDOWMENT, TO GIVE GRANTS TO ITS FACULTY MEMBERS TO SUPPORT RESEARCH?
TABLE 57.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY ITSELF, OR FROM A BUDGETARY AUTHORITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLEGE, SUCH AS A STATE OR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OR ENDOWMENT, TO GIVE GRANTS TO ITS FACULTY MEMBERS TO SUPPORT RESEARCH? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 57.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY ITSELF, OR FROM A BUDGETARY AUTHORITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLEGE, SUCH AS A STATE OR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OR ENDOWMENT, TO GIVE GRANTS TO ITS FACULTY MEMBERS TO SUPPORT RESEARCH? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 57.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY ITSELF, OR FROM A BUDGETARY AUTHORITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLEGE, SUCH AS A STATE OR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OR ENDOWMENT, TO GIVE GRANTS TO ITS FACULTY MEMBERS TO SUPPORT RESEARCH? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 57.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SUPPORT FROM THE COLLEGE OR UNIVERSITY ITSELF, OR FROM A BUDGETARY AUTHORITY ASSOCIATED WITH THE COLLEGE, SUCH AS A STATE OR PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OR ENDOWMENT, TO GIVE GRANTS TO ITS FACULTY MEMBERS TO SUPPORT RESEARCH? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 58.1: IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUCH SUPPORT AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRIOR QUESTION, HOW MUCH SUCH SUPPORT WILL IT RECEIVE IN THE 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR?
TABLE 58.2: IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUCH SUPPORT AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRIOR QUESTION, HOW MUCH SUCH SUPPORT WILL IT RECEIVE IN THE 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 58.3: IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUCH SUPPORT AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRIOR QUESTION, HOW MUCH SUCH SUPPORT WILL IT RECEIVE IN THE 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 58.4: IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUCH SUPPORT AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRIOR QUESTION, HOW MUCH SUCH SUPPORT WILL IT RECEIVE IN THE 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 58.5: IF THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVES SUCH SUPPORT AS DESCRIBED IN THE PRIOR QUESTION, HOW MUCH SUCH SUPPORT WILL IT RECEIVE IN THE 2009-10 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 59.1: IN YOUR VIEW ACCEPTANCE RATES FOR GRANT APPLICATIONS BY FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE…
TABLE 59.2: IN YOUR VIEW ACCEPTANCE RATES FOR GRANT APPLICATIONS BY FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE… BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 59.3: IN YOUR VIEW ACCEPTANCE RATES FOR GRANT APPLICATIONS BY FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE… BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 59.4: IN YOUR VIEW ACCEPTANCE RATES FOR GRANT APPLICATIONS BY FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE… BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 59.5: IN YOUR VIEW ACCEPTANCE RATES FOR GRANT APPLICATIONS BY FACULTY IN YOUR DEPARTMENT HAVE… BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 61.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SOME FORM OF ALLOCATION OR ALLOWANCE FROM THE LIBRARY, OR DIRECT INFLUENCE OVER A PORTION OF THE LIBRARY BUDGET, FOR JOURNAL AND DATABASE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND OTHER RESOURCES IN ECONOMICS AND/OR FINANCE?
TABLE 61.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SOME FORM OF ALLOCATION OR ALLOWANCE FROM THE LIBRARY, OR DIRECT INFLUENCE OVER A PORTION OF THE LIBRARY BUDGET, FOR JOURNAL AND DATABASE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND OTHER RESOURCES IN ECONOMICS AND/OR FINANCE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 61.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SOME FORM OF ALLOCATION OR ALLOWANCE FROM THE LIBRARY, OR DIRECT INFLUENCE OVER A PORTION OF THE LIBRARY BUDGET, FOR JOURNAL AND DATABASE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND OTHER RESOURCES IN ECONOMICS AND/OR FINANCE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 61.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SOME FORM OF ALLOCATION OR ALLOWANCE FROM THE LIBRARY, OR DIRECT INFLUENCE OVER A PORTION OF THE LIBRARY BUDGET, FOR JOURNAL AND DATABASE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND OTHER RESOURCES IN ECONOMICS AND/OR FINANCE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 61.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT RECEIVE SOME FORM OF ALLOCATION OR ALLOWANCE FROM THE LIBRARY, OR DIRECT INFLUENCE OVER A PORTION OF THE LIBRARY BUDGET, FOR JOURNAL AND DATABASE SUBSCRIPTIONS AND OTHER RESOURCES IN ECONOMICS AND/OR FINANCE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 62.1: IF SO, WHAT WAS THIS AMOUNT IN THE 2008-09 ACADEMIC YEAR?
TABLE 62.2: IF SO, WHAT WAS THIS AMOUNT IN THE 2008-09 ACADEMIC YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.

TABLE 63.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT CONTRIBUTE OR ARCHIVE JOURNAL ARTICLES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE DEPARTMENT'S FACULTY TO A DIGITAL REPOSITORY MAINTAINED BY THE COLLEGE LIBRARY?
TABLE 63.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT CONTRIBUTE OR ARCHIVE JOURNAL ARTICLES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE DEPARTMENT'S FACULTY TO A DIGITAL REPOSITORY MAINTAINED BY THE COLLEGE LIBRARY? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 63.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT CONTRIBUTE OR ARCHIVE JOURNAL ARTICLES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE DEPARTMENT'S FACULTY TO A DIGITAL REPOSITORY MAINTAINED BY THE COLLEGE LIBRARY? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 63.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT CONTRIBUTE OR ARCHIVE JOURNAL ARTICLES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE DEPARTMENT'S FACULTY TO A DIGITAL REPOSITORY MAINTAINED BY THE COLLEGE LIBRARY? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 63.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT CONTRIBUTE OR ARCHIVE JOURNAL ARTICLES AND OTHER PUBLICATIONS AUTHORED BY THE DEPARTMENT'S FACULTY TO A DIGITAL REPOSITORY MAINTAINED BY THE COLLEGE LIBRARY? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 64.1: HAS THE DEPARTMENT EVER CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF A MAJOR DATABASE OR JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION IN ECONOMICS / FINANCE FOR THE LIBRARY THAT THE LIBRARY WOULD OTHERWISE BE UNABLE TO AFFORD WITHOUT THE DEPARTMENTS' FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE?
TABLE 64.2: HAS THE DEPARTMENT EVER CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF A MAJOR DATABASE OR JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION IN ECONOMICS / FINANCE FOR THE LIBRARY THAT THE LIBRARY WOULD OTHERWISE BE UNABLE TO AFFORD WITHOUT THE DEPARTMENTS' FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 64.3: HAS THE DEPARTMENT EVER CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF A MAJOR DATABASE OR JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION IN ECONOMICS / FINANCE FOR THE LIBRARY THAT THE LIBRARY WOULD OTHERWISE BE UNABLE TO AFFORD WITHOUT THE DEPARTMENTS' FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 64.4: HAS THE DEPARTMENT EVER CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF A MAJOR DATABASE OR JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION IN ECONOMICS / FINANCE FOR THE LIBRARY THAT THE LIBRARY WOULD OTHERWISE BE UNABLE TO AFFORD WITHOUT THE DEPARTMENTS' FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 64.5: HAS THE DEPARTMENT EVER CONTRIBUTED TO THE COST OF A MAJOR DATABASE OR JOURNAL SUBSCRIPTION IN ECONOMICS / FINANCE FOR THE LIBRARY THAT THE LIBRARY WOULD OTHERWISE BE UNABLE TO AFFORD WITHOUT THE DEPARTMENTS' FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 65.1: WHAT WERE THE DEPARTMENT'S COSTS IN THE PAST YEAR FOR EXPENSES RELATING TO RECRUITING NEW FACULTY?
TABLE 65.2: WHAT WERE THE DEPARTMENT'S COSTS IN THE PAST YEAR FOR EXPENSES RELATING TO RECRUITING NEW FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 65.3: WHAT WERE THE DEPARTMENT'S COSTS IN THE PAST YEAR FOR EXPENSES RELATING TO RECRUITING NEW FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 65.4: WHAT WERE THE DEPARTMENT'S COSTS IN THE PAST YEAR FOR EXPENSES RELATING TO RECRUITING NEW FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 65.5: WHAT WERE THE DEPARTMENT'S COSTS IN THE PAST YEAR FOR EXPENSES RELATING TO RECRUITING NEW FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 66.1: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE DEPARTMENT’S TOTAL COSTS FOR SUCH RECRUITMENT IN THE UPCOMING YEAR?
TABLE 66.2: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE DEPARTMENT’S TOTAL COSTS FOR SUCH RECRUITMENT IN THE UPCOMING YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 66.3: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE DEPARTMENT’S TOTAL COSTS FOR SUCH RECRUITMENT IN THE UPCOMING YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 66.4: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE DEPARTMENT’S TOTAL COSTS FOR SUCH RECRUITMENT IN THE UPCOMING YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 66.5: WHAT DO YOU EXPECT WILL BE THE DEPARTMENT’S TOTAL COSTS FOR SUCH RECRUITMENT IN THE UPCOMING YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 67.1: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN TENURED OR TENURE TRACK FACULTY OVER THE NEXT YEAR?
TABLE 67.2: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN TENURED OR TENURE TRACK FACULTY OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 67.3: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN TENURED OR TENURE TRACK FACULTY OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 67.4: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN TENURED OR TENURE TRACK FACULTY OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 67.5: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN TENURED OR TENURE TRACK FACULTY OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 68.1: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) OVER THE NEXT YEAR?
TABLE 68.2: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 68.3: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 68.4: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 68.5: HOW MANY NEW FULL TIME POSITIONS DO YOU EXPECT TO FILL IN NON-TENURE TRACK FACULTY (WHO ARE NOT ADJUNCTS) OVER THE NEXT YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 69.1: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COURSE LOAD IN YOUR DEPARTMENT IS ACCOUNTED FOR BY ADJUNCT FACULTY?
TABLE 69.2: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COURSE LOAD IN YOUR DEPARTMENT IS ACCOUNTED FOR BY ADJUNCT FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 69.3: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COURSE LOAD IN YOUR DEPARTMENT IS ACCOUNTED FOR BY ADJUNCT FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 69.4: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COURSE LOAD IN YOUR DEPARTMENT IS ACCOUNTED FOR BY ADJUNCT FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 69.5: WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE COURSE LOAD IN YOUR DEPARTMENT IS ACCOUNTED FOR BY ADJUNCT FACULTY? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 70.1: HOW MANY FULL TIME EQUIVALENT SECRETARIAL OR SUPPORT FUNCTION POSITIONS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE DEPARTMENT PER YEAR?
TABLE 70.2: HOW MANY FULL TIME EQUIVALENT SECRETARIAL OR SUPPORT FUNCTION POSITIONS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE DEPARTMENT PER YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 70.3: HOW MANY FULL TIME EQUIVALENT SECRETARIAL OR SUPPORT FUNCTION POSITIONS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE DEPARTMENT PER YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 70.4: HOW MANY FULL TIME EQUIVALENT SECRETARIAL OR SUPPORT FUNCTION POSITIONS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE DEPARTMENT PER YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 70.5: HOW MANY FULL TIME EQUIVALENT SECRETARIAL OR SUPPORT FUNCTION POSITIONS ARE ALLOCATED TO THE DEPARTMENT PER YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 71.1: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A SPECIFIC BUDGET OR A LINE ITEM ON THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DEPARTMENT?
TABLE 71.2: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A SPECIFIC BUDGET OR A LINE ITEM ON THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DEPARTMENT? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 71.3: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A SPECIFIC BUDGET OR A LINE ITEM ON THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DEPARTMENT? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 71.4: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A SPECIFIC BUDGET OR A LINE ITEM ON THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DEPARTMENT? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 71.5: DOES THE DEPARTMENT HAVE A SPECIFIC BUDGET OR A LINE ITEM ON THE DEPARTMENTAL BUDGET FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FOR THE DEPARTMENT? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

TABLE 72.1: HOW MUCH DID THE DEPARTMENT SPEND FOR COMPUTERS, XEROX MACHINES, FAX MACHINES AND OTHER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIFICALLY FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE IN THE PAST YEAR?
TABLE 72.2: HOW MUCH DID THE DEPARTMENT SPEND FOR COMPUTERS, XEROX MACHINES, FAX MACHINES AND OTHER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIFICALLY FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY DEVELOPMENT STATUS OF THE REGION.
TABLE 72.3: HOW MUCH DID THE DEPARTMENT SPEND FOR COMPUTERS, XEROX MACHINES, FAX MACHINES AND OTHER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIFICALLY FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY FACULTY SIZE.
TABLE 72.4: HOW MUCH DID THE DEPARTMENT SPEND FOR COMPUTERS, XEROX MACHINES, FAX MACHINES AND OTHER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIFICALLY FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY THE ENROLLMENT LEVEL OF THE COLLEGES.
TABLE 72.5: HOW MUCH DID THE DEPARTMENT SPEND FOR COMPUTERS, XEROX MACHINES, FAX MACHINES AND OTHER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SPECIFICALLY FOR DEPARTMENTAL USE IN THE PAST YEAR? BROKEN OUT BY GENERAL CARNEGIE CLASS OF THE INSTITUTION.

This series of reports examines the direction and management of academic departments. The reports focus on trends in research priorities, staffing, salaries, tenure decision-making, enrollment, course offerings, budgets, technology & information use,relations with research institutes, students and college management and other issues of importance to the governance and development of academic departments.

List of Participants:

- Bates College
- Bogazici University
- Bogor Agricultural University
- Charles University Prague
- Chinese Culture University
- City University of New York Graduate Center
- Cornell University
- Faculty of Economics and Business Administration
- Federal University of Pernambuco
- HEC Paris
- Hunter College, CUNY
- Institut fur Hohere Studien, Vienna
- Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México
- King Faisal University
- Louisiana State University
- Lund University
- Morehouse College
- North South University
- Pardee RAND Graduate School
- Polytechnique
- Providence University
- Silesian University, School of Business Administration
- Sogang University
- The City College of New York
- The Graduate Institute, Geneva
- Toulouse Business School
- Universita di Foggia
- Univerasità di Padova
- Universidad del Rosario
- Università Cattolica Milano
- Università di Napoli Federico II
- Universita' di Torino
- Università di Urbino "Carlo Bo"
- University of California Berkeley
- University of Houston
- University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
- University of Linz
- University of Maryland
- University of Melbourne
- University of Minnesota
- University of New Mexico
- University of Skovde
- University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus
- Williams College
- Wroclaw University of Economics
- XLRI School of Business and Human Resources

Order Online - visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/1582661

Order by Fax - using the order form below

Order By Post - print the order form below and send to

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.