Triple Analysis: Lung Cancer, Lymphoma and Cancer Vaccines
Bioseeker, July 2011, Pages: 2936
This triple analysis focuses on cancer drug development strategies in both Lung Cancer and Lymphoma and by the mechanism/target/effect of Cancer Vaccines. Each of these three individual parts is evaluated according to standardized criteria in a five pillar pipeline drug assessment methodology to compare drug development strategies in oncology. This makes it easy to find and compare analysis not only within one single cancer focus area but also between different areas.
Below is a short synopsis of each part included in this report:
Part I: Lung Cancer
The lung cancer report part comprises defined and up to date development strategies for 416 lung cancer drugs within the portfolio of 218 investigators, from Ceased to Marketed. This part extensively analyses their 241 identified drug targets, organized into 237 drug target strategies, and assesses them in eight different compound strategies and and three subindications of lung cancer.
This part is based on the following publication:
Lung Cancer: A Decision Support Tool for Optimizing the Pipeline from Research To Market
Part II: Lymphoma
The lymphoma report part comprises defined and up to date development strategies for 282 lymphoma drugs within the portfolio of 154 investigators, from Ceased to Marketed. This part extensively analyses their 181 identified drug targets, organized into 173 drug target strategies, and assesses them in eight different compound strategies and and five subindications of lymphoma.
This part is based on the following publication:
A Decision Support Tool for Optimizing The Lymphoma Pipeline: From Research and Development to Market
Part III: Cancer Vaccines
The cancer vaccine report part comprises defined and up to date development strategies for 155 cancer vaccine drugs within the portfolio of 99 investigators, from Ceased to Marketed. This part extensively analyses their 94 identified drug targets, organized into 91 drug target strategies, and assesses them in 42 different cancer indications.
This part is based on the following publication:
Commercializing Cancer Vaccines: A Decision Support Tool for Optimizing the Pipeline
The report is written for you to understand and assess the impact of competitor entry and corresponding changes to development strategies for your own portfolio products. It helps teams to maximize molecule value by selecting optimal development plans and manage risk and uncertainty. The report serves as an external commercial advocate for pharmaceutical companies’ pipeline and portfolio planning (PPP) in cancer by:
- Providing you with competitive input to the R&D organization to guide development of early product ideas and ensure efforts are aligned with business objectives
- Assisting you to make informed decisions in selecting cancer indications that are known to be appropriate for your drug’s properties
- Analyzing, correlating and integrating valuable data sources in order to provide accurate data for valuation of pipeline, in-licensing and new business opportunities
- Providing you with commercial analytic support for due diligence on in-licensing and acquisition opportunities
- Supporting development of integrative molecule, pathway and disease area strategies
- Integrating knowledge for you to consider the therapeutic target for the highest therapeutic outcome and return on investment
This report provides systems, analytical and strategic support both internally to PPP and to stakeholders across your own organization. The report will also be an important part of creating and implementing a market development plan for cancer drugs to insure that the optimal market conditions exist by the time the products are commercialized.
Key Topics Covered:
Part I: Lung Cancer
5.1 The Scope of this Report 31
6 Consider the Therapeutic Target Among Lung Cancer Drugs for the Highest Therapeutic Outcome and Return on Investment (241 Drug Targets) 35-526
7 Emerging New Products to Established Ones: Drug Target Strategies of Lung Cancer Drugs by their Highest Stage of Development (237 Drug Target Strategies and 416 Lung Cancer Drugs) 527-817
8 Compound Strategies at Work: Competitive Benchmarking of Lung Cancer Drugs by Compound Strategy (8 Compound Strategies) 818-870
9 Selecting Subindication for Lung Cancer Drugs (Three Subindications of Lung Cancer) 871-898
10 Pipeline and Portfolio Planning: Competitive Benchmarking of the Lung Cancer Drug Pipeline by Investigator (218 Companies) 899-1299
11 Disclaimer 1300
12 Drug Index 1301
13 Company Index 1314
Figures: Includes 7 Figures
Tables: Includes 284 Tables
Total Number of Pages: 1323
Part II: Lymphoma
5.1 The Scope of this Report 26
6 Consider the Therapeutic Target Among Lymphoma Drugs for the Highest Therapeutic Outcome and Return on Investment (181 Drug Targets) 30-387
7 Emerging New Products to Established Ones: Drug Target Strategies of Lymphoma Drugs by their Highest Stage of Development (173 Drug Target Strategies and 282 Lymphoma Drugs) 388-596
8 Compound Strategies at Work: Competitive Benchmarking of Lymphoma Drugs by Compound Strategy (8 Compound Strategies) 597-636
9 Selecting Subindication for Lymphoma Drugs (Five Subindications of Lymphoma) 637-657
10 Pipeline and Portfolio Planning: Competitive Benchmarking of the Lymphoma Drug Pipeline by Investigator (152 Companies) 658-938
11 Disclaimer 939
12 Drug Index 940
13 Company Index 948
Figures: Includes 6 Figures
Tables: Includes 222 Tables
Total Number of Pages: 954
Part III: Cancer Vaccines
5.1 The Scope of this Report 26
6 Consider the Therapeutic Target Among Cancer Vaccine Drugs for the Highest Therapeutic Outcome and Return on Investment (94 Drug Targets) 30-194
7 Emerging New Products to Established Ones: Drug Target Strategies of Cancer Vaccine Drugs by their Highest Stage of Development (91 Drug Target Strategies and 155 Cancer Vaccine Drugs) 195-308
8 Compound Strategies at Work: Competitive Benchmarking of Cancer Vaccine Drugs by Compound Strategy (7 Compound Strategies) 309-338
9 Selecting Cancer Indications for Cancer Vaccine Drugs (42 Cancer Indications) 339-386
10 Pipeline and Portfolio Planning: Competitive Benchmarking of the Cancer Vaccine Drug Pipeline by Investigator (99 Investigators) 387-649
11 Disclaimer 650
12 Drug Index 651
13 Company Index 656
Figures: Includes 6 Figures
Tables: Includes 205 Tables
Total Number of Pages: 659
Customers who bought this item also bought
All rights reserved. © Copyright 2013 Research and Markets WWW5
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Publishers Employment Opportunities Site Map Link to us Webmaster Affiliate Network