• SELECT SITE CURRENCY
Select a currency for use throughout the site
The Instant Impact of Perera v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (Fla. May 6, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Third-Party Bad-Faith Actions Against Insurers Where There Was No Exposure to an Excess Judgment
ExecSense, June 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Perera v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (Fla. May 6, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Third-Party Bad-Faith Actions Against Insurers Where There Was No Exposure to an Excess Judgment” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as insureds who settle with all but one insurer may not recover bad-faith damages from the non-settling insurer if they settled with the other insurers for less than the full policy limits available to them under the respective policies.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and third-party bad-faith actions, Jeffrey L. Kingsley (Partner, Goldberg Segalla LLP), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision in Perera v. U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. on third-party bad-faith actions against a non-settling insurer where the insurer’s actions did not expose the insured to an excess judgment
- Perspective on the impact of the Florida Supreme Court’s decision (answering a certified question from the Eleventh Circuit) on future third-party bad-faith actions against non-settling insurers where numerous insurance policies are implicated, where insurers in those circumstances may be less likely to participate in a global insurance settlement if they are not exposed to bad-faith liability in excess of their policy limits, and how future settlement agreements (including the assignment of equitable subrogation claims) may be negotiated and drafted
- The 10 questions being asked the most by insurance lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other insurance lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
"ExecSense Webinars are an enhanced and effective way to immediately understand new legal trends or decisions that impact your practice." - Robert Orozco, Partner, Meyers Nave
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” - Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” - Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson