|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
What Criminal Defense Lawyers Need to Know About Protecting Their Clients' Miranda Rights After Berghuis v. Thompkins (ExecSense Webinars)
ExecSense, July 2010, Minutes: 60
“What Criminal Defense Lawyers Need to Know About Protecting Their Clients’ Miranda Rights After Berghuis v. Thompkins” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as the Supreme Court’s recent decision now places an affirmative obligation on suspects to explicitly waive their right to remain silent under Miranda and narrows the grounds upon which criminal defense lawyers may seek to suppress client “confessions” after lengthy police interrogations.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case on Miranda warnings and police interrogation procedure, Brian Berson, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about protecting clients’ Miranda rights after Berghuis v. Thompkins
- Perspective on the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s decision on what criminal defense lawyers should advise clients to do and say if they are interrogated by the police, how future courts will determine that a suspect actually understood his Miranda rights for waiver purposes, what prisoners must say to clearly invoke their right to remain silent, how long police may interrogate suspects who remain silent or are uncooperative (but fail to explicitly invoke their Miranda rights), and what criminal defense lawyers must demonstrate to suppress “confessions” by their clients going forward
- The 10 questions being asked the most by criminal defense lawyers with respect to how this decision will impact their clients’ Miranda right to remain silent and what proactive steps they should be taking to protect their clients
- Case studies of what other criminal defense lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'An expeditious way to obtain authoritative current information and ideas on a subject of interest.' - David Kera, Partner, Oblon Spivak
'Just in time information to improve knowledge of current topics and trends.” - Thomas M. Armstrong, Attorney, Reid and Riege
“Well organized, well articulated, and easy to follow. The ExecSense webinar I attended was the best virtual learning experience I've had in quite some time.” - Brian K. Moore, HR Communications, Humana
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc. (Penn. Aug. 17, 2010) on Insurers' Ability to Recoup Defense Costs for Uninsured Claims
What Tax Lawyers Need to Know About Intangible Nexus and State Income Tax - Understanding the Impact of Recent State Supreme Court Decisions on Clients
Plea-Bargaining Tips, Tricks & Techniques for Criminal Lawyers (ExecSense Webinars)
New Ways to Grow Your Criminal Law Practice (ExecSense Webinars)
The Instant Impact of Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson on ADR Lawyers and Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Agreements Expressly Assigning to Arbitration the “Gateway” Issue of the Enforceability of the Agreement to Arbitrate
What Environmental Lawyers Need to Know About the Impact of the DOJ Criminal Probe of the Gulf Oil Spill on Civil Suits (ExecSense Webinars)
The Instant Impact of Clarendon Amer. Ins. Co. v. StarNet Ins. Co. (Cal. App. July 27, 2010) on Determining Whether Pre-Litigation ADR Is a “Suit” for Purposes of Defense Coverage Under CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of LeBron v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital (Ill. Feb. 4, 2010) on Health Care Lawyers and Caps on Medical Malpractice Awards for Noneconomic Damages
The Impact of Social Media Websites on Criminal Defense Lawyers and Their Clients (ExecSense Webinars)
The Impact of Global Warming on Insurance Lawyers & Their Clients
|
|
|
|
