The Instant Impact of New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board (U.S. June 17, 2010) on Labor/Employment Lawyers and the Hundreds of Decisions (and Their Precedential Effect) Issued by the NLRB Without Statutory Authority

ExecSense, August 2010, Minutes: 60

“The Instant Impact of New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board (U.S. June 27, 2010) on Labor/Employment Lawyers and the Hundreds of Decisions (and Their Precedential Effect) Issued by the NLRB Without Statutory Authority” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as the U.S. Supreme Court’s finding that the Board lacked statutory authority to decide cases during the 27-month period from January 2008 to March 2010 when it only had two members raises key questions about the legitimacy and precedential effect of the nearly 600 decisions that it made during that time period.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.

The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case, and the impact it is having on labor/employment lawyers, Alan Berkowitz (Of Counsel, Bingham McCutchen), and focuses on:

- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Delaware Chancery Court’s decision in New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board on the nearly 600 decisions (and the precedential effect of those decisions) issued by the NLRB without statutory authority between January 2008 and March 2010

- Perspective on the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s decision on whether parties to prior final NLRB judgments have the ability to challenge those judgments or if res judicata principles apply, when and under what conditions it might make sense for parties to spend the time and money to seek to have a final decision reheard, and what the Supreme Court’s decision means with respect to the precedential effect of the nearly 600 decisions issued by the NLRB in the 27-month time period when it only had two members

- The 10 questions being asked the most by labor/employment lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking

- Case studies of what other labor/employment lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling

Praise for ExecSense Webinars:

"ExecSense Webinars are an enhanced and effective way to immediately understand new legal trends or decisions that impact your practice." - Robert Orozco, Partner, Meyers Nave

“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” - Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle

“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” - Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson

Customers who bought this item also bought

• What Criminal Defense Lawyers Need to Know About Protecting Their Clients' Miranda Rights After Berghuis v. Thompkins (ExecSense Webinars)
• The Instant Impact of American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc. (Penn. Aug. 17, 2010) on Insurers' Ability to Recoup Defense Costs for Uninsured Claims
• The Instant Impact of Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson on ADR Lawyers and Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Agreements Expressly Assigning to Arbitration the “Gateway” Issue of the Enforceability of the Agreement to Arbitrate
• The Instant Impact of Ansys, Inc. v. Computational Dynamics North America, Ltd. (1st Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) on Employment Lawyers and Drafting & Enforcing Noncompetition Agreements
• The Instant Impact of US Bank, Nat'l Ass'n v. Ibanez (Jan. 7, 2011) on the Residential Securitized Mortgage Market
• The Instant Impact of City of Emeryville v. Sherwin Williams Company (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2010) on Contribution Protection Under CERCLA - What is the Value and is There a Way to Protect Settling Parties Against Future Suits
• The Instant Impact of Perera v. US Fidelity & Guaranty Co. (Fla. May 6, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Third-Party Bad-Faith Actions Against Insurers Where There Was No Exposure to an Excess Judgment
• The Instant Impact of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella (3rd Cir. July 27, 2010) on the Standard for Granting Preliminary Injunctions Against Employment by a Competitor Due to Potential Disclosure of Trade Secrets
• What Tax Lawyers Need to Know Before Choosing a Forum for Their Next Federal Civil Tax Litigation Dispute in 2011
• The Instant Impact of Pension Comittee of the University of Montreal Pension Plan v. Banc of America Securities LLC (S.D. N.Y. Jan. 15 2010) On Litigators and e-Discovery