|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
ExecSense, Sep 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers’ Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as insurers may not have a duty under standard CGL policy language to defend policyholders against product liability lawsuits that allege only economic loss and no bodily injury.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and insurance coverage litigation, Mark E. Miller (Shareholder, Greenberg Traurig LLP), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Seventh Circuit’s decision on insurers’ duty to defend no-injury product liability lawsuits under standard CGL policies
- Perspective on the impact of the Seventh Circuit’s decision on the manner in which future courts analyze an insurer’s duty under standard CGL policy language to defend product liability claims that allege only economic loss and on the way in which coverage for product liability claims under CGL policies may be drafted differently going forward
- The 10 questions being asked the most by insurance lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other insurance lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'ExecSense Webinars are an enhanced and effective way to immediately understand new legal trends or decisions that impact your practice.' - Robert Orozco, Partner, Meyers Nave
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” - Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” - Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
How to Advise Your Clients to Update Their CGL Policy for 2011
The Instant Impact of Clarendon Amer. Ins. Co. v. StarNet Ins. Co. (Cal. App. July 27, 2010) on Determining Whether Pre-Litigation ADR Is a “Suit” for Purposes of Defense Coverage Under CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc. (Penn. Aug. 17, 2010) on Insurers' Ability to Recoup Defense Costs for Uninsured Claims
The Instant Impact of Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. (6th Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) On Construction Lawyers and the Scope of Defective-Workmanship Exclusions in General Contractor CGL Policies-
The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly
The Instant Impact of Papudesu v. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association of Rhode Island on Insurance Lawyers & The Right to Settle Language in Professional Liability Policies
How to Advise Your Clients to Update Their CGL Policy for 2010 - What Insurance Lawyers and Their Clients are Negotiating in 2010, Why They are Seeking These Changes, and How This Impacts Your Clients
The Instant Impact of TMW Enterprises, Inc. v. Fed. Ins. Co. (6th Cir. Aug. 25, 2010) on the Intersection of Exclusions and “Ensuing Loss” Coverage Provisions in All-Risk Policies
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About Ames v. Home Depot (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2011)
The Instant Impact of Hatmaker v. Memorial Med. Ctr. on the Level of Protection Applicable to an Employee's "Participation" in a Pre-EEOC Internal Harassment Investigation for Purposes of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Section
|
|
|
|
