|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of Clarendon Amer. Ins. Co. v. StarNet Ins. Co. (Cal. App. July 27, 2010) on Determining Whether Pre-Litigation ADR Is a “Suit” for Purposes of Defense Coverage Under CGL Policies
ExecSense, Oct 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Clarendon Amer. Ins. Co. v. StarNet Ins. Co. (Cal. App. July 27, 2010) on Determining Whether Pre-Litigation ADR Is a ‘Suit’ for Purposes of Defense Coverage Under CGL Policies” is a time efficient way for insurance lawyers to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as a California appellate court weighs in on the divided issue on what type of proceedings qualify as “suits” under CGL policies, finding defense coverage for a statutorily required pre-litigation dispute resolution process.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and CGL policy insurance coverage litigation, Patrick T. Wong (Associate, Foley & Lardner, LLP) and Eileen R. Ridley (Partner, Foley & Lardner, LLP), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the California appellate court’s decision on determining whether pre-litigation ADR is a “suit” for purposes of defense coverage under CGL policies
- Comprehensive overview of case law on the divided issue of what type of proceeding qualifies as a “suit” for purposes of CGL policies that only provide defense coverage for “suits”
- Perspective on the impact of the California appellate court’s decision on the manner in which future courts analyze whether pre-litigation ADR or other non-traditional “court” proceedings constitute “suits” for purposes of a CGL policy, what factors would make a court more likely to find that the proceeding was a “suit,” how future CGL policies may be drafted differently as a result, and what it all means for CGL policyholders deciding whether to attempt to resolve a dispute through ADR before formal litigation
- The 10 questions being asked the most by insurance lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other insurance lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'ExecSense Webinars are an enhanced and effective way to immediately understand new legal trends or decisions that impact your practice.' - Robert Orozco, Partner, Meyers Nave
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact on Insurance Lawyers of Baker v. Nat'l Interstate Ins. Co. (Cal. App. Jan. 11, 2010) on Products and Completed Hazards Exclusions and Negligent Service Claims
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of Fortney & Weygandt, Inc. v. Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. (6th Cir. Feb. 12, 2010) On Construction Lawyers and the Scope of Defective-Workmanship Exclusions in General Contractor CGL Policies-
The Instant Impact of American and Foreign Ins. Co. v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc. (Penn. Aug. 17, 2010) on Insurers' Ability to Recoup Defense Costs for Uninsured Claims
How to Advise Your Clients to Update Their CGL Policy for 2010 - What Insurance Lawyers and Their Clients are Negotiating in 2010, Why They are Seeking These Changes, and How This Impacts Your Clients
What Insurance Lawyers Need to Know About Chinese Drywall- Understanding the issues, the Latest Legal Developments, and What it Means for Your Clients
The Instant Impact of Papudesu v. Medical Malpractice Joint Underwriting Association of Rhode Island on Insurance Lawyers & The Right to Settle Language in Professional Liability Policies
The Instant Impact of Endurance Amer. Spec. Ins. Co. v. Brown, Miclette, & Britt, Inc. (S.D. Tex. Jan. 4, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers - Why Insurance Companies May Now be Required to Defend Lawsuits Arising from Ponzi Schemes and Securities Violations
How to Advise Your Clients to Update Their CGL Policy for 2011
The Instant Impact of Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson on ADR Lawyers and Unconscionability Challenges to Arbitration Agreements Expressly Assigning to Arbitration the “Gateway” Issue of the Enforceability of the Agreement to Arbitrate
|
|
|
|
