|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence
ExecSense, Oct 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as the Third Circuit provides helpful guidance on the type of statistical evidence sufficient to establish a prima facie case of disparate impact discrimination.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and disparate impact discrimination litigation, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Third Circuit’s decision on disparate impact discrimination litigation and the use of statistical evidence
- Perspective on the impact of the Third Circuit’s decision on the manner in which future courts analyze statistical evidence at the summary judgment stage for purposes of determining whether a prima facie case of disparate impact discrimination has been established, the use of different statistical standards and aggregation in statistical analysis by experts in disparate impact litigation disputes, and more
- The 10 questions being asked the most by employment lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other employment lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'ExecSense Webinars are an enhanced and effective way to immediately understand new legal trends or decisions that impact your practice.' - Robert Orozco, Partner, Meyers Nave
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About the Impact of Lopez v. Pacific Maritime
The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly
The Instant Impact of Chloe v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC (2nd Cir. Aug. 5, 2010) on Personal Jurisdiction and Future Trademark Infringement Litigation Against Internet Counterfeiters
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of Cal. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control v. Hearthside Residential Corp. (9th Cir. July 22, 2010) on the Date When “Owner and Operator” Status Is Determined Under CERCLA
The Instant Impact of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella (3rd Cir. July 27, 2010) on the Standard for Granting Preliminary Injunctions Against Employment by a Competitor Due to Potential Disclosure of Trade Secrets
The Instant Impact of PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Analysis of Vertical Price Fixing Agreements Under the Rule of Reason Framework
The Instant Impact of Hatmaker v. Memorial Med. Ctr. on the Level of Protection Applicable to an Employee's "Participation" in a Pre-EEOC Internal Harassment Investigation for Purposes of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Section
The Instant Impact of Sabinsa Corp. v. Creative Compounds, LLC (3rd Cir. July 9, 2010) on "Likelihood of Confusion" Analysis in Trademark Infringement Litigation
The Instant Impact of Polycarpe v. E&S Landscaping, Inc. (11th Cir. Aug. 31, 2010) on Future FLSA Litigation Against Small Businesses
|
|
|
|
