|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of IUE-CWA Corp. v. Visteon Corp. (In re Visteon Corp.) (3rd Cir. July 13, 2010) on Bankruptcy Lawyers and the Termination of Retiree Benefits in Chapter 11
ExecSense, Oct 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of IUE-CWA Corp. v. Visteon Corp. (In re Visteon Corp.)(3rd Cir. July 13, 2010) on Bankruptcy Lawyers and the Termination of Retiree Benefits in Chapter 11” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as a debtor whose retiree benefits plans include the unilateral right to terminate at any time will now be required to comply with section 1114 of the Bankruptcy Code in order to terminate, both postpetition and during the six-month period prior to commencing bankruptcy.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and the termination of retiree benefits in Chapter 11, Graham Stieglitz (Partner, Burr Forman LLP), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Third Circuit’s decision on the termination of retiree benefits in Chapter 11
- Perspective on the impact of the Third Circuit’s decision on distressed companies with substantial terminable-at-will retiree benefits who are considering filing for bankruptcy, whether such companies should select venues outside the Third Circuit when seeking to reorganize under chapter 11, how courts outside the Third Circuit will reconcile the Court’s divergence from the narrower interpretation of section 1114 adopted by courts in the Second Circuit and giving effect to a debtor’s prepetition contractual rights over section 1114, and how debtors’ counsel’s treatment of retiree benefits during pre-bankruptcy planning may be affected by this ruling
- The 10 questions being asked the most by bankruptcy lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other bankruptcy lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'An expeditious way to obtain authoritative current information and ideas on a subject of interest.' – David Kera, Partner, Oblon Spivak
'Just in time information to improve knowledge of current topics and trends.” – Thomas M. Armstrong, Attorney, Reid and Riege
“Well organized, well articulated, and easy to follow. The ExecSense webinar I attended was the best virtual learning experience I've had in quite some time.” – Brian K. Moore, HR Communications, Humana
Customers who bought this item also bought
What Bankruptcy Lawyers Need to Know About In Re: Buttermilk Towne Center (B.A.P.) (6th Cir. Dec. 23rd, 2010)
The Instant Impact of Stagi v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. (3rd Cir. Aug. 16, 2010) on Disparate Impact Discrimination Litigation and the Use of Statistical Evidence
The Instant Impact of Sabinsa Corp. v. Creative Compounds, LLC (3rd Cir. July 9, 2010) on "Likelihood of Confusion" Analysis in Trademark Infringement Litigation
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About Ames v. Home Depot (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2011)
The Instant Impact of Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. Botticella (3rd Cir. July 27, 2010) on the Standard for Granting Preliminary Injunctions Against Employment by a Competitor Due to Potential Disclosure of Trade Secrets
The Instant Impact of Cal. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control v. Hearthside Residential Corp. (9th Cir. July 22, 2010) on the Date When “Owner and Operator” Status Is Determined Under CERCLA
The Instant Impact of Chloe v. Queen Bee of Beverly Hills, LLC (2nd Cir. Aug. 5, 2010) on Personal Jurisdiction and Future Trademark Infringement Litigation Against Internet Counterfeiters
The Instant Impact of City of Emeryville v. Sherwin Williams Company (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2010) on Contribution Protection Under CERCLA - What is the Value and is There a Way to Protect Settling Parties Against Future Suits
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
The Instant Impact of Hatmaker v. Memorial Med. Ctr. on the Level of Protection Applicable to an Employee's "Participation" in a Pre-EEOC Internal Harassment Investigation for Purposes of Title VII's Anti-Retaliation Section
|
|
|
|
