|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of the Intel-FTC Settlement on Increased Antitrust Enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act
ExecSense, Oct 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of the Intel-FTC Settlement on Increased Antitrust Enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this settlement and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this settlement by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the settlement, as it signals a continuation of the FTC’s recent trend towards more aggressive use of enforcement authority under Section 5 and shows that the FTC is willing to use its enforcement power under Section 5 outside the context of intellectual property.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this settlement and antitrust enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Intel-FTC settlement on increased antitrust enforcement under Section 5 of the FTC Act
- Perspective on the impact of the Intel-FTC settlement on the FTC’s willingness to push the envelope with regard to its broad powers under Section 5, whether the door is now open to future administrative actions against market leaders who use legally obtained intellectual property rights to limit their rivals’ ability to compete, but whose conduct does not rise to the level of abuse of monopoly power under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, whether the FTC will continue to use its enforcement power outside the context of intellectual property, and how large companies seeking to provide bundled discounts to their customers may be affected by this settlement
- The 10 questions being asked the most by antitrust lawyers and their clients with respect to how this settlement will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other antitrust lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this settlement
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'An expeditious way to obtain authoritative current information and ideas on a subject of interest.' – David Kera, Partner, Oblon Spivak
'Just in time information to improve knowledge of current topics and trends.” – Thomas M. Armstrong, Attorney, Reid and Riege
“Well organized, well articulated, and easy to follow. The ExecSense webinar I attended was the best virtual learning experience I've had in quite some time.” – Brian K. Moore, HR Communications, Humana
Customers who bought this item also bought
Intellectual Property Law Best Practices for Antitrust Lawyers
What to Learn from the FTC Consent Orders Breaking Up Consummated Mergers
What Intellectual Property Lawyers Need to Know About Interpreting & Analyzing Income Statements - Everything You Need to Know in 60 Minutes
What Antitrust Lawyers Need to Know About the Proposed Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Pre-Notification Form Changes and the Potential Impact on Your Clients
What IP Lawyers & Their Clients Need to Know About the Impact of the iPad, Kindle, & Other Devices on Intellectual Property for 2011
The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly
The Instant Impact of FTC v. Lundbeck Inc. (D. Minn Aug. 31, 2010) on the Continued Use of the Market Definition Analysis in Light of the Revised Horizontal Merger Guidelines
The Instant Impact of Southeast Missouri Hospital v. Bard, Inc. (8th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Potential Antitrust Implications of Medical Supplier Contracts with Group Purchasing Organizations
The Instant Impact of City of Emeryville v. Sherwin Williams Company (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2010) on Contribution Protection Under CERCLA - What is the Value and is There a Way to Protect Settling Parties Against Future Suits
The Most Important Advertising Law Tips & Techniques for IP Lawyers for 2011 - Avoiding Trademark Issues, Branding Disputes & Other Marketing and Legal Issues for Your Clients
|
|
|
|
