|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Analysis of Vertical Price Fixing Agreements Under the Rule of Reason Framework
ExecSense, Nov 2010, Minutes: 60
“The Instant Impact of PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (5th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Analysis of Vertical Price Fixing Agreements Under the Rule of Reason Framework” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as minimum resale price plans may now be deemed lawful under the rule of reason framework if their pro-competitive benefits outweigh their anti-competitive harms.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and analysis of vertical price fixing agreements under the rule of reason framework (Annamarie Daley, Partner, Barnes & Thornburg LLP), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Fifth Circuit’s decision on the analysis of vertical price fixing agreements under the rule of reason framework and on future litigation in this area
- Perspective on the impact of the Fifth Circuit’s decision on the legality of vertical minimum price fixing (aka minimum resale price plans), whether companies can assume that there is now a rule of per se legality, what impact the rule of reason framework will have in states that have adopted their own per se rules for vertical minimum price fixing, what set of facts will support a finding under the rule of reason framework that the pro-competitive benefits of a minimum resale price plan outweighs its anti-competitive harms, and how manufacturers’ implementation of distribution policies may be affected by this ruling
- The 10 questions being asked the most by antitrust lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other antitrust lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'ExecSense Webinars are an enhanced and effective way to immediately understand new legal trends or decisions that impact your practice.' - Robert Orozco, Partner, Meyers Nave
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
Customers who bought this item also bought
The Instant Impact of Southeast Missouri Hospital v. Bard, Inc. (8th Cir. Aug. 17, 2010) on Potential Antitrust Implications of Medical Supplier Contracts with Group Purchasing Organizations
The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly
The Instant Impact of City of Emeryville v. Sherwin Williams Company (9th Cir. Sept. 15, 2010) on Contribution Protection Under CERCLA - What is the Value and is There a Way to Protect Settling Parties Against Future Suits
What Labor & Employment Lawyers Need to Know About Ames v. Home Depot (7th Cir. Jan. 6, 2011)
The Instant Impact of Cal. Dept. of Toxic Substances Control v. Hearthside Residential Corp. (9th Cir. July 22, 2010) on the Date When “Owner and Operator” Status Is Determined Under CERCLA
The Instant Impact of Medmarc Cas. Ins. Co. v. Avent America, Inc. (7th Cir. July 15, 2010) on Insurance Lawyers and Insurers' Duty to Defend No-Injury Product Liability Lawsuits Under Standard CGL Policies
What Bankruptcy Lawyers Need to Know About In Re: Buttermilk Towne Center (B.A.P.) (6th Cir. Dec. 23rd, 2010)
The Instant Impact of Polycarpe v. E&S Landscaping, Inc. (11th Cir. Aug. 31, 2010) on Future FLSA Litigation Against Small Businesses
The Instant Impact of Sabinsa Corp. v. Creative Compounds, LLC (3rd Cir. July 9, 2010) on "Likelihood of Confusion" Analysis in Trademark Infringement Litigation
What Antitrust Lawyers Need to Know About the Proposed Hart-Scott-Rodino Act Pre-Notification Form Changes and the Potential Impact on Your Clients
|
|
|
|
