Research and Markets, the largest resource for market research information in world providing essential market research reports, industry research, industry analysis, forecasts, market studies, company profiles and country reports.
Welcome - Register - Login - Help/FAQ - 0 items View Basket
Worlds Largest Market Research Resource - 1516265 Live Reports
Search Research and Markets
  Search
Enter keywords, a title or
a report id number below.





Advanced   
Company search
Register for free email updates of market research
Currency
  Select a currency for use throughout the site



Viewing report

Order by Fax
Ask a Question
Printer Friendly
PDF Brochure
Electronic (PDF)Add to Basket
Site LicenseAdd to Basket
EnterprisewideAdd to Basket
Live Chat Live Help Software for Website

Generic Substitution: Taking a Narrow View?

FirstWord Publishing, Nov 2010, Pages: 54


  Description  
   Table of Contents   
    
    
    
     
  Enquire before Buying   
  Send to a Friend   

As health care expenditures rise, governments, payers, healthcare providers and patients alike are focused intently on one thing: capping runaway costs.

For the generics industry, it heralds a boom-time. In regulated markets, relatively inexpensive generic drugs are increasingly favoured by payers for their low cost and effectiveness. Prescribed by physicians but dispensed by pharmacists, drugs are increasingly substituted for cheaper generics somewhere between the doctor's surgery and home.

Yet there is an exception, and as observational evidence mounts, it's one that is worth noticing.

Narrow therapeutic index (NTI) drugs, for which small changes in concentration can lead to big alterations in efficacy and negative side effects, are the focus of much scrutiny, both by legislators and the public. As evidence in academic literature grows to indicate that formulation changes are linked to negative effects in patients, NTI substitution is becoming a hot-button topic for the generics industry.

This dossier tackles it head-on in our latest report, Generic Substitution: Taking a Narrow View? Based on expert views from leading thinkers such as University of Colorado immunosuppressant specialist Dr Uwe Christians, the report nimbly examines how some markets are implementing broad exclusion policies, while some American legislators are drafting ‘carve-out' exceptions. Containing analysis, definitions, charts and interviews, the report includes an overview of immunosuppressant, antiepileptic, cardiovascular and mood-modifying drugs and the impact of substitution. Insightful, intelligent and timely, the report is critical reading for the generics industry.

The report includes:

- ExpertViews interviews with leading thinkers in the field
- A concise overview of generics uptake in major markets and how NTI generic substitution differ

Key features:

- Analysis of how physicians, pharmacists and patients influence generic uptake
- Insights into how bioequivalence is the key to the NTI substitution debate
- Explanations of generic carve-outs in the US, illustrated with charts and diagrams
- Analysis of the pros and cons of generics substitution restrictions in dealing with NTIs
- A review of NTI drug classes, including immunosuppressant, antiepileptic, cardiovascular and mood-modifying drugs
- Complete regulatory overview covering the Federal Drug Administration's position

Key quotes from the report

“The generic has to be just as good as the originator's drug. So by definition, the pharmacology of a [generic] NTI drug has to match the originator to be efficacious and not to go through cycles of toxicity. This means that NTI drugs set a pretty high bar for the generic to meet.” University of Colorado immunosuppressant expert, Dr Uwe Christians.

“There is a theoretical risk about switching between NTI drugs from two generics manufacturers, where one's product is on the left side of the bioequivalence range and the other is on the right side, leading to a very large difference between them. However, I have not seen rigorous evidence that this risk has led to bad patient outcomes in the market.” Harvard Medical School pharmacoeconomist, Dr Aaron Kesselheim.


Product samples

A sample for this product is available. Please Login/Register to download this sample.

Customers who bought this item also bought

Pain Therapeutics - Drugs, Markets and Companies

The Future of the Generics Industry: Opportunities, Threats and Key Trends

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring - Technologies, Markets, and Companies

Pipeline Insight: Epilepsy - Past successes hard to emulate in highly genericized market

Biosimilar Drugs in Europe: Threat or Opportunity to Innovation?

The Cardiovascular Market Outlook to 2016

The Global Pain Therapeutics Market, 4th Edition: Market Trends & R&D Insights

Controlled Release Cardiovascular Therapeutics: Drugs, Indications, Markets and Prospects

The Pricing and Reimbursement Environment for Respiratory Disease Therapies

Generics in Cardiovascular Diseases Market to 2018 - Loss of Lipitor Market Exclusivities and Impending Patent Expirations of Plavix to Drive Generic Substitution



For enquiries please call us on:
  +353-1-415-1241 (GMT Office Hours)
  1-800-526-8630 (US/Canada Toll Free)
  1-917-300-0470 (EST Office Hours)

   All rights reserved. © Copyright 2012 Research and Markets
   Terms and conditions Privacy Policy Publishers Employment Opportunities Site Map Link to us Webmaster Affiliate Network


Research and Markets RSS Feeds