|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly
ExecSense, Feb 2011, Pages: 60
“The Instant Impact of In re Text Messaging Antitrust Litigation (7th Cir. Dec. 29th, 2010) on the Burden Faced by Plaintiffs Pleading an Antitrust Conspiracy Under Twombly” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as plaintiffs pleading an antitrust conspiracy will now have to do more than merely allege that defendants engaged in parallel conduct and plead at least sufficient circumstantial facts to render an inference of conspiracy plausible.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case and analysis of the burden faced by plaintiffs pleading an antitrust conspiracy, Barbara Hart (COO, Lowey Dannenberg Cohen & Hart, P.C.), and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Seventh Circuit’s decision on the burden faced by plaintiffs pleading an antitrust conspiracy under Twombly
- Perspective on the impact of the Seventh Circuit’s decision on the burden faced by plaintiffs pleading an antitrust conspiracy, what set of facts will support more than a mere allegation that defendants engaged in parallel conduct, what allegations will provide sufficient circumstantial facts to render an inference of conspiracy plausible, whether plaintiffs will need to allege direct, “smoking gun” evidence of a conspiracy, how a complaint’s “plausibility” will be assessed, what set of facts will “establish a nonnegligible probability that the claim is valid,” and how antitrust plaintiffs’ pleading strategies may be affected by this ruling
- The 10 questions being asked the most by antitrust lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other antitrust lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'ExecSense Webinars are an enhanced and effective way to immediately understand new legal trends or decisions that impact your practice.' - Robert Orozco, Partner, Meyers Nave
“Was first on the scene with an in depth overview of this game changing decision.” – Howard Grubbs, Practice Group Leader, Womble Carlyle
“If it's up to the minute information that you need, go with ExecSense.” – Christopher J. Dow, Hunsucker Goodstein & Nelson
|
|
|
|
