|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
What IP Lawyers Need to Know About the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act
ExecSense, March 2011, Minutes: 60
What IP Lawyers Need to Know About the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on this domain name dispute law that is intended to give trademark and service mark owners legal remedies against defendants who obtain domain names in bad faith that are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to get up to speed on the law, understand what a mark owner must show to prevail in a cybersquatting case, what is bad faith intent to profit from a mark, what remedies may be granted for violations of the Act, and more.
Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.
The webinar is led by an expert on the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, Rosemary Tarlton, Partner at Morrison & Foerster LLP, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, a domain name dispute law that is intended to give trademark and service mark owners legal remedies against defendants who obtain domain names in bad faith that are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark
- A comprehensive overview of the domain name dispute law, including what a mark owner must show to prevail in a cybersquatting case (i.e. that defendant has a bad faith intent to profit from that mark, that defendant registers, traffics in, or uses a domain name that is identical or confusingly similar to a distinctive/famous mark), what factors are considered to determine bad faith (e.g. trademark rights in the domain name, the extent to which the domain name consists of the legal name of the defendant, the defendant's prior use of the domain name in connection with the bona fide offering of any goods or services, etc.), what remedies may be granted for violations of the Act (e.g. forfeiture or cancellation of a domain name, statutory damages), and more
- The 10 questions most asked by intellectual property lawyers about how the Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act will impact their clients and their practice this year
- Case studies of intellectual property lawyers that have successfully brought or defended against Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act cases, what legal strategies and techniques worked best for them, and important lessons learned
Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
'An expeditious way to obtain authoritative current information and ideas on a subject of interest.' – David Kera, Partner, Oblon Spivak
'Just in time information to improve knowledge of current topics and trends.” – Thomas M. Armstrong, Attorney, Reid and Riege
“Well organized, well articulated, and easy to follow. The ExecSense webinar I attended was the best virtual learning experience I've had in quite some time.” – Brian K. Moore, HR Communications, Humana
|
|
|
|
