|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
Mobile Phones - North America (NAFTA) Industry Guide
Datamonitor, Feb 2011, Pages: 131
The Mobile Phones - North America (NAFTA) Industry Guide is an essential resource for top-level data and analysis covering the Mobile Phones industry in each of the North American Free Trade Agreement (United States, Canada, and Mexico) countries. The report includes easily comparable data on market value, volume, segmentation and market share, plus full five year market forecasts. It examines future problems, innovations and potential growth areas within the market.
Scope of the Report
- Contains an executive summary and data on value, volume and segmentation
- Provides textual analysis of the industry's prospects, competitive landscape and profiles of the leading companies
- Incorporates in-depth five forces competitive environment analysis and scorecards
- Compares data from the US, Canada and Mexico, alongside individual chapters on each country. .
- Includes a five-year forecast of the industry
Highlights
The mobile phones industry within the NAFTA countries had a total market value of $12,392.8 million in 2009.
Mexico was the fastest growing country, with a CAGR of 18.3% over the 2005–09 periods.
Within the mobile phones industry, the US is the leading country among the NAFTA bloc, with market revenues of $10,400 million in 2009.
The US is expected to lead the mobile phones industry in the NAFTA bloc, with a value of $14,600 in 2014
Why you should buy this report
- Spot future trends and developments
- Inform your business decisions
- Add weight to presentations and marketing materials
- Save time carrying out entry-level research
Market Definition
The mobile phone market consists of all analog and digital handsets used for mobile telephony. Market volumes for a given year are defined as the number of shipments to end-users, including both new uptake and renewal purchases. Market values are given at retail selling price (RSP). Any currency conversions used in the creation of this report have been calculated using constant 2009 annual average exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
