Printer Friendly

Printed from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/1675135

The 2011-2016 Outlook for EPurchasing and EProcurement Products in Japan

Description:
WHAT IS LATENT DEMAND AND THE P.I.E.? The concept of latent demand is rather subtle. The term latent typically refers to something that is dormant, not observable, or not yet realized. Demand is the notion of an economic quantity that a target population or market requires under different assumptions of price, quality, and distribution, among other factors. Latent demand, therefore, is commonly defined by economists as the industry earnings of a market when that market becomes accessible and attractive to serve by competing firms. It is a measure, therefore, of potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) or total revenues (not profit) if Japan is served in an efficient manner. It is typically expressed as the total revenues potentially extracted by firms. The “market” is defined at a given level in the value chain. There can be latent demand at the retail level, at the wholesale level, the manufacturing level, and the raw materials level (the P.I.E. of higher levels of the value chain being always smaller than the P.I.E. of levels at lower levels of the same value chain, assuming all levels maintain minimum profitability). The latent demand for ePurchasing and eProcurement products in Japan is not actual or historic sales. Nor is latent demand future sales. In fact, latent demand can be either lower or higher than actual sales if a market is inefficient (i.e., not representative of relatively competitive levels). Inefficiencies arise from a number of factors, including the lack of international openness, cultural barriers to consumption, regulations, and cartel-like behavior on the part of firms. In general, however, latent demand is typically larger than actual sales in a market. For reasons discussed later, this report does not consider the notion of “unit quantities”, only total latent revenues (i.e., a calculation of price times quantity is never made, though one is implied). The units used in this report are U.S. dollars not adjusted for inflation (i.e., the figures incorporate inflationary trends). If inflation rates vary in a substantial way compared to recent experience, actually sales can also exceed latent demand (not adjusted for inflation). On the other hand, latent demand can be typically higher than actual sales as there are often distribution inefficiencies that reduce actual sales below the level of latent demand. As mentioned in the introduction, this study is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. In fact, all the current products or services on the market can cease to exist in their present form (i.e., at a brand-, R&D specification, or corporate-image level) and all the players can be replaced by other firms (i.e., via exits, entries, mergers, bankruptcies, etc.), and there will still be latent demand for ePurchasing and eProcurement products at the aggregate level. Product and service offerings, and the actual identity of the players involved, while important for certain issues, are relatively unimportant for estimates of latent demand. THE METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the latent demand for ePurchasing and eProcurement products across the prefectures and cites of Japan, I used a multi-stage approach. Before applying the approach, one needs a basic theory from which such estimates are created. In this case, I heavily rely on the use of certain basic economic assumptions. In particular, there is an assumption governing the shape and type of aggregate latent demand functions. Latent demand functions relate the income of a prefecture, city, household, or individual to realized consumption. Latent demand (often realized as consumption when an industry is efficient), at any level of the value chain, takes place if an equilibrium is realized. For firms to serve a market, they must perceive a latent demand and be able to serve that demand at a minimal return. The single most important variable determining consumption, assuming latent demand exists, is income (or other financial resources at higher levels of the value chain). Other factors that can pivot or shape demand curves include external or exogenous shocks (i.e., business cycles), and or changes in utility for the product in question. Ignoring, for the moment, exogenous shocks and variations in utility across geographies, the aggregate relation between income and consumption has been a central theme in economics. The figure below concisely summarizes one aspect of problem. In the 1930s, John Meynard Keynes conjectured that as incomes rise, the average propensity to consume would fall. The average propensity to consume is the level of consumption divided by the level of income, or the slope of the line from the origin to the consumption function. He estimated this relationship empirically and found it to be true in the short-run (mostly based on cross-sectional data). The higher the income, the lower the average propensity to consume. This type of consumption function is labeled "A" in the figure below (note the rather flat slope of the curve). In the 1940s, another macroeconomist, Simon Kuznets, estimated long-run consumption functions which indicated that the marginal propensity to consume was rather constant (using time series data). This type of consumption function is shown as "B" in the figure below (note the higher slope and zero-zero intercept). The average propensity to consume is constant. Is it declining or is it constant? A number of other economists, notably Franco Modigliani and Milton Friedman, in the 1950s (and Irving Fisher earlier), explained why the two functions were different using various assumptions on intertemporal budget constraints, savings, and wealth. The shorter the time horizon, the more consumption can depend on wealth (earned in previous years) and business cycles. In the long-run, however, the propensity to consume is more constant. Similarly, in the long run, households with no income eventually have no consumption (wealth is depleted). While the debate surrounding beliefs about how income and consumption are related is interesting, in this study a very particular school of thought is adopted. In particular, we are considering the latent demand for ePurchasing and eProcurement products across the prefectures and cities of Japan. The smallest cities have few inhabitants. I assume that all of these cities fall along a "long-run" aggregate consumption function. This long-run function applies despite some of these prefectures having wealth; current income dominates the latent demand for ePurchasing and eProcurement products. So, latent demand in the long-run has a zero intercept. However, I allow different propensities to consume (including being on consumption functions with differing slopes, which can account for differences in industrial organization, and end-user preferences). Given this overriding philosophy, I will now describe the methodology used to create the latent demand estimates for ePurchasing and eProcurement products in Japan. Since ICON Group has asked me to apply this methodology to a large number of categories, the rather academic discussion below is general and can be applied to a wide variety of categories and geographic locations, not just ePurchasing and eProcurement products in Japan. Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection Any study of latent demand requires that some standard be established to define “efficiently served”. Having implemented various alternatives and matched these with market outcomes, I have found that the optimal approach is to assume that certain key indicators are more likely to reflect efficiency than others. These indicators are given greater weight than others in the estimation of latent demand compared to others for which no known data are available. Of the many alternatives, I have found the assumption that the highest aggregate income and highest income-per-capita markets reflect the best standards for “efficiency”. High aggregate income alone is not sufficient (i.e. some cities have high aggregate income, but low income per capita and can not assumed to be efficient). Aggregate income can be operationalized in a number of ways, including gross domestic product (for industrial categories), or total disposable income (for household categories; population times average income per capita, or number of households times average household income). Latent demand is therefore estimated using data collected for relatively efficient markets from independent data sources (e.g. Official Chinese Agencies, the World Resources Institute, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, various agencies from the United Nations, industry trade associations, the International Monetary Fund, Euromonitor, Mintel, Thomson Financial Services, the U.S. Industrial Outlook, and the World Bank). Depending on original data sources used, the definition of “ePurchasing and eProcurement products” is established. In the case of this report, the data were reported at the aggregate level, with no further breakdown or definition. In other words, any potential product or service that might be incorporated within ePurchasing and eProcurement products falls under this category. Public sources rarely report data at the disaggregated level in order to protect private information from individual firms that might dominate a specific product-market. These sources will therefore aggregate across components of a category and report only the aggregate to the public. While private data are certainly available, this report only relies on public data at the aggregate level without reliance on the summation of various category components. In other words, this report does not aggregate a number of components to arrive at the “whole”. Rather, it starts with the “whole”, and estimates the whole for all prefectures and cities in Japan (without needing to know the specific parts that went into the whole in the first place). Given this caveat, in this report we define ePurchasing and eProcurement products as including all commonly understood products falling within this broad category, such as software solutions for eProcurement, eSourcing, contract life-cycle management (CLM), automated spend analysis, accounts payable electronic invoice presentment and payment (AP-EIPP), services procurement, supplier performance management, and supplier network services, irrespective of product packaging, formulation, size, or form. Companies participating in this industry include Oracle, SAP, IBM, Microsoft, and Google. In addition to the sources indicated below, additional information available to the public via news and/or press releases published by players in the industry (including reports from AMR Research, Global Industry Analysts, Forrester Research, Frost & Sullivan, Gartner, IDC, and MarketResearch.com) was considered in defining and calibrating this category. All figures are in a common currency (U.S. dollars, millions) and are not adjusted for inflation (i.e., they are current values). Exchange rates used to convert to U.S. dollars are averages for the year in question. Future exchange rates are assumed to be constant in the future at the current level (the average of the year of this publication’s release in 2010). Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing Based on the aggregate view of ePurchasing and eProcurement products as defined above, data were then collected for as many geographic locations as possible for that same definition, at the same level of the value chain. This generates a convenience sample of indicators from which comparable figures are available. If the series in question do not reflect the same accounting period, then adjustments are made. In order to eliminate short-term effects of business cycles, the series are smoothed using an 2 year moving average weighting scheme (longer weighting schemes do not substantially change the results). If data are available for a geographic region, but these reflect short-run aberrations due to exogenous shocks (such as would be the case of beef sales in a prefecture or city stricken with foot and mouth disease), these observations were dropped or "filtered" from the analysis. Step 3. Filling in Missing Values In some cases, data are available on a sporadic basis. In other cases, data may be available for only one year. From a Bayesian perspective, these observations should be given greatest weight in estimating missing years. Assuming that other factors are held constant, the missing years are extrapolated using changes and growth in aggregate national, prefecture and city-level income. Based on the overriding philosophy of a long-run consumption function (defined earlier), prefectures and cities which have missing data for any given year, are estimated based on historical dynamics of aggregate income for that geographic entity. Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation Given the data available from the first three steps, the latent demand is estimated using a “varying-parameter cross-sectionally pooled time series model”. Simply stated, the effect of income on latent demand is assumed to be constant unless there is empirical evidence to suggest that this effect varies (i.e., . the slope of the income effect is not necessarily same for all prefectures or cities). This assumption applies along the aggregate consumption function, but also over time (i.e., not all prefectures or cities in Japan are perceived to have the same income growth prospects over time). Another way of looking at this is to say that latent demand for ePurchasing and eProcurement products is more likely to be similar across prefectures or cities that have similar characteristics in terms of economic development. This approach is useful across geographic regions for which some notion of non-linearity exists in the aggregate cross-region consumption function. For some categories, however, the reader must realize that the numbers will reflect a prefecture’s or city’s contribution to latent demand in Japan and may never be realized in the form of local sales. Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation Nonlinearities are assumed in cases where filtered data exist along the aggregate consumption function. Because Japan consists of more than 1,000 cities, there will always be those cities, especially toward the bottom of the consumption function, where non-linear estimation is simply not possible. For these cities, equilibrium latent demand is assumed to be perfectly parametric and not a function of wealth (i.e., a city’s stock of income), but a function of current income (a city’s flow of income). In the long run, if a prefecture has no current income, the latent demand for ePurchasing and eProcurement products is assumed to approach zero. The assumption is that wealth stocks fall rapidly to zero if flow income falls to zero (i.e., cities which earn low levels of income will not use their savings, in the long run, to demand ePurchasing and eProcurement products). In a graphical sense, for low income cities, latent demand approaches zero in a parametric linear fashion with a zero-zero intercept. In this stage of the estimation procedure, a low-income city is assumed to have a latent demand proportional to its income, based on the cities closest to it on the aggregate consumption function. Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking Based on the models described above, latent demand figures are estimated for all major cities in Japan. These are then aggregated to get prefecture totals. This report considers a city as a part of the regional and national market. The purpose is to understand the density of demand within a prefecture and the extent to which a city might be used as a point of distribution within its prefecture. From an economic perspective, however, a city does not represent a population within rigid geographical boundaries. To an economist or strategic planner, a city represents an area of dominant influence over markets in adjacent areas. This influence varies from one industry to another, but also from one period of time to another. I allocate latent demand across areas of dominant influence based on the relative economic importance of cities within its prefecture. Not all cities (e.g. the smaller towns) are estimated within each prefecture as demand may be allocated to adjacent areas of influence. Since some cities have higher economic wealth than others within the same prefecture, a city’s population is not generally used to allocate latent demand. Rather, the level of economic activity of the city vis-à-vis others is used. Figures are rounded, so minor inconsistencies may exist across tables.
 
Contents:
1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Overview 1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 1.3 The Methodology 1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 2.1 The Latent Demand in Japan 2.2 Top 100 Cities Sorted by Rank 3 AICHI 3.1 Latent Demand by Year - Aichi 3.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Aichi 3.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Aichi 4 AKITA 4.1 Latent Demand by Year - Akita 4.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Akita 4.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Akita 5 AOMORI 5.1 Latent Demand by Year - Aomori 5.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Aomori 5.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Aomori 6 CHIBA 6.1 Latent Demand by Year - Chiba 6.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Chiba 6.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Chiba 7 EHIME 7.1 Latent Demand by Year - Ehime 7.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ehime 7.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Ehime 8 FUKUI 8.1 Latent Demand by Year - Fukui 8.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Fukui 8.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Fukui 9 FUKUOKA 9.1 Latent Demand by Year - Fukuoka 9.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Fukuoka 9.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Fukuoka 10 FUKUSHIMA 10.1 Latent Demand by Year - Fukushima 10.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Fukushima 10.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Fukushima 11 GIFU 11.1 Latent Demand by Year - Gifu 11.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Gifu 11.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Gifu 12 GUMMA 12.1 Latent Demand by Year - Gumma 12.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Gumma 12.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Gumma 13 HIROSHIMA 13.1 Latent Demand by Year - Hiroshima 13.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hiroshima 13.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Hiroshima 14 HOKKAIDO 14.1 Latent Demand by Year - Hokkaido 14.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hokkaido 14.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Hokkaido 15 HYOGO 15.1 Latent Demand by Year - Hyogo 15.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hyogo 15.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Hyogo 16 IBARAKI 16.1 Latent Demand by Year - Ibaraki 16.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ibaraki 16.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Ibaraki 17 ISHIKAWA 17.1 Latent Demand by Year - Ishikawa 17.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ishikawa 17.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Ishikawa 18 IWATE 18.1 Latent Demand by Year - Iwate 18.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iwate 18.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Iwate 19 KAGAWA 19.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kagawa 19.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kagawa 19.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kagawa 20 KAGOSHIMA 20.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kagoshima 20.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kagoshima 20.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kagoshima 21 KANAGAWA 21.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kanagawa 21.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kanagawa 21.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kanagawa 22 KOCHI 22.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kochi 22.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kochi 22.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kochi 23 KUMAMOTO 23.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kumamoto 23.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kumamoto 23.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kumamoto 24 KYOTO 24.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kyoto 24.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kyoto 24.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kyoto 25 MIE 25.1 Latent Demand by Year - Mie 25.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mie 25.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Mie 26 MIYAGI 26.1 Latent Demand by Year - Miyagi 26.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Miyagi 26.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Miyagi 27 MIYAZAKI 27.1 Latent Demand by Year - Miyazaki 27.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Miyazaki 27.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Miyazaki 28 NAGANO 28.1 Latent Demand by Year - Nagano 28.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nagano 28.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Nagano 29 NAGASAKI 29.1 Latent Demand by Year - Nagasaki 29.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nagasaki 29.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Nagasaki 30 NARA 30.1 Latent Demand by Year - Nara 30.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nara 30.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Nara 31 NIIGATA 31.1 Latent Demand by Year - Niigata 31.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Niigata 31.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Niigata 32 OITA 32.1 Latent Demand by Year - Oita 32.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oita 32.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Oita 33 OKAYAMA 33.1 Latent Demand by Year - Okayama 33.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Okayama 33.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Okayama 34 OKINAWA 34.1 Latent Demand by Year - Okinawa 34.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Okinawa 34.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Okinawa 35 OSAKA 35.1 Latent Demand by Year - Osaka 35.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Osaka 35.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Osaka 36 SAGA 36.1 Latent Demand by Year - Saga 36.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Saga 36.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Saga 37 SAITAMA 37.1 Latent Demand by Year - Saitama 37.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Saitama 37.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Saitama 38 SHIGA 38.1 Latent Demand by Year - Shiga 38.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Shiga 38.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Shiga 39 SHIMANE 39.1 Latent Demand by Year - Shimane 39.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Shimane 39.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Shimane 40 SHIZUOKA 40.1 Latent Demand by Year - Shizuoka 40.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Shizuoka 40.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Shizuoka 41 TOCHIGI 41.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tochigi 41.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tochigi 41.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tochigi 42 TOKUSHIMA 42.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tokushima 42.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tokushima 42.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tokushima 43 TOKYO 43.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tokyo 43.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tokyo 43.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tokyo 44 TOTTORI 44.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tottori 44.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tottori 44.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tottori 45 TOYAMA 45.1 Latent Demand by Year - Toyama 45.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Toyama 45.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Toyama 46 WAKAYAMA 46.1 Latent Demand by Year - Wakayama 46.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wakayama 46.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Wakayama 47 YAMAGATA 47.1 Latent Demand by Year - Yamagata 47.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Yamagata 47.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Yamagata 48 YAMAGUCHI 48.1 Latent Demand by Year - Yamaguchi 48.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Yamaguchi 48.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Yamaguchi 49 YAMANASHI 49.1 Latent Demand by Year - Yamanashi 49.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Yamanashi 49.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Yamanashi 50 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 50.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 50.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions
 
Ordering:
Order Online - visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/1675135

Order by Fax - using the order form below

Order By Post - print the order form below and send to

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.

 
Page 1 of 2
Printed Oct 24th 2014
10:48:35 PM

Fax order form

To place a fax order simply print this form, fill in and fax the completed form to the number below. If you have any questions please email help@researchandmarkets.net

Order information

Please verify that the product information is correct and select the format you require.

Product name

The 2011-2016 Outlook for EPurchasing and EProcurement Products in Japan

Web Address

http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/1675135

Office Code

SCOI7T

 

Report Formats

Please enter the quantity of the report format you require.

Format Quantity Price
Electronic (PDF) - Enterprisewide USD 990
Electronic (PDF) - Single User USD 495

Contact information

Please enter all the information below in block capitals.

Title:
Mr Mrs Dr Miss Ms Prof
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Job Title:
Organisation:
Address:
City:
Postal / Zip Code:
Country:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:

Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)

Page 2 of 2
Printed Oct 24th 2014
10:48:35 PM

Payment information

Please indicate the payment method you would like to use by selecting the appropriate box.

Pay by Credit Card:

American Express

Diners Club

Master Card

Visa

Cardholder's Name:
Cardholder's Signature:
Expiry Date:
/
Card Number:
CVV Security Code:
Issue date:
/ (Diners Club only)
 
Pay by Check:

Please post the check, accompanied by this form, to:

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.

 
Pay by Wire Transfer:

Please transfer funds to:

Account Number:
83313083
Sort Code:
98-53-30
Swift Code:
ULSBIE2D
IBAN Number:
IE78ULSB98533083313083
Bank Address:
Ulster Bank,
27-35 Main Street
Blackrock,
Co. Dublin
Ireland.
 

If you have a Marketing Code please enter it below:

Marketing Code:

Please note that by ordering from Research and Markets you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions at http://www.researchandmarkets.com/info/terms.asp

Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)