|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVE | Criteria | Financial Institutions | Request for Comment: Principal Stability Fund Rating Criteria Jan 10
Standard & Poors, Jan 2010
Abstract
Do you believe that the WAM(F) limits proposed are consistent with the risk profile of highly rated principal stability-rated funds? Do you believe our correlation guidelines should continue to be based on the Fed Funds Rate? Do you think our correlation guidelines should be updated to include three-month Libor in addition to Fed Funds, or just based on three-month Libor? Do you believe three-month Libor is appropriate or should we use one-month Libor? Do you believe the securities we have classified to count toward our 10% limited liquidity/illiquid basket are consistent with highly rated funds? Do you think the less-restrictive diversification (issuer concentration) criteria for certain highly rated issuers are consistent with highly rated funds? Are the interest-rate changes of...
Standard and Poors RatingsXpress Credit Research provides in-depth coverage of international corporates, financial institutions, insurance companies, utilities, sovereigns and structured finance programs. RatingsXpress Credit Research lets users determine the credit rating of holdings and identify key factors underlying an issuer's creditworthiness, distinguishes the different risk exposures for new and existing deals, and provides an understanding of how their analysts interpret key regulatory, political and environmental events and their economic impact.
Research Type: Commentary
Criteria articles describe the thought process and methodology Standard & Poor's analysts use in determining ratings. These commentary pieces discuss both the quantitative (economic and financial) and qualitative (business analysis and caliber of management) aspects of the analysis, as well as legal issues.
|
|
|
|
