WORLD'S LARGEST MARKET RESEARCH RESOURCE — 1,519,265 REPORTS

 
 
• SEARCH FOR A REPORT

Viewing report

Search
Enter keywords, a title or a report id number below.
Advanced

• ORDER BY FAX

Order By Fax

• SELECT SITE CURRENCY

Select a currency for use throughout the site



  • Online Access Information Icon
  • 1 - 5 Users Information Icon
  • 1 - 10 Users Information Icon
  • Enterprisewide Information Icon
Live Chat Live Help Software for Website

What IP Lawyers Need to Know About the Bratz Verdict

ExecSense, June 2011, Minutes: 60

“What IP Lawyers Need to Know About the Bratz Verdict” is a time efficient way to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of this case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPad, Kindle or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of this decision by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as employment agreements assigning rights to intellectual property must be absolutely clear in scope, or else courts will leave the interpretation of such provisions to the jury.

Upon ordering, ExecSense will email you a link to download the webinar files for viewing on your computer, mobile phone, iPod, iPad, Kindle or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device). Take advantage of your next commute, flight, business trip, lunch, or free hour in your schedule to view this webinar.

The webinar is led by an expert on the ramifications of this case for intellectual property lawyers, Randy Friedberg, Counsel, White & Williams LLP, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the language of employment agreements assigning rights to intellectual property
- Perspective on the impact of the Ninth Circuit’s decision on the specificity of language in employment agreements assigning rights to intellectual property and the use of terms of art such as “copyright,” “inventions,” “ideas” and “scope of employment”, whether the term “inventions” will be deemed to include ideas, or only more concrete creations, whether the phrase “at any time during my employment” should limit an employer’s rights to works created in the scope of the inventor’s employment, what questions regarding the language of employment agreements assigning rights to intellectual property will be left to juries, and more
- The 10 questions being asked the most by intellectual property lawyers and their clients with respect to how this decision will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking right now
- Case studies of what other intellectual property lawyers are doing for their clients, now and in the future, based on this ruling

Praise for ExecSense Webinars:
"An expeditious way to obtain authoritative current information and ideas on a subject of interest." – David Kera, Partner, Oblon Spivak
"Just in time information to improve knowledge of current topics and trends.” – Thomas M. Armstrong, Attorney, Reid and Riege
“Well organized, well articulated, and easy to follow. The ExecSense webinar I attended was the best virtual learning experience I've had in quite some time.” – Brian K. Moore, HR Communications, Humana

Customers who bought this item also bought