WORLD'S LARGEST MARKET RESEARCH RESOURCE — 1,519,265 REPORTS

 
 
• SEARCH FOR A REPORT

Viewing report

Search
Enter keywords, a title or a report id number below.
Advanced

• ORDER BY FAX

Order By Fax

• SELECT SITE CURRENCY

Select a currency for use throughout the site



This product is currently not available for purchase.
Live Chat Live Help Software for Website

Customers who bought this item also bought

Veiled Threats?. Edition No. 1

VDM Publishing House, November 2008, Pages: 384

For a variety of historical, cultural and political
reasons, the Islamic veil has become an
increasingly controversial matter in Europe. This is
particularly the case in France, where Parliament
passed, in 2004, a piece of legislation that
prohibits students from wearing the Muslim veil
(with any other ‘conspicuous’ religious
sign) in the classroom. This book compares the
French and American attitudes towards religious
symbolism in general and the Islamic veil in
particular. Against conventional wisdom, it argues
that before the passage of the new statute, the
French and American legal systems adopted a
substantially similar approach that respected
religious insignia. This is hardly
surprising, the book suggests, for the American
conception of secularism is in many respects
stricter than the French idea of 'laïcité'. The book
also tries to demolish some popular myths
surrounding the 'affaire des foulards': that the
French legal system is fiercely secular; that the
American one is strongly ‘religious’; and that
France was, in 2004, confronted with a
veritable ‘veil emergency’ that rendered the passage
of the new statute all but inevitable.

Herman, Salton.
PhD, was educated at the Universities of Trento (Italy),
Auckland (New Zealand) and Oxford (UK). Dr Salton was also
briefly a
visiting researcher at Sciences-Po, Paris and TUJ, Tokyo; an
officer at the Icelandic Human Rights Centre, Reykjavik; and an
associate with
the Office of the Under-Secretary-General, United Nations
HQ, New York.