-
Electronic (PDF)
-
Site License
-
Enterprisewide
The State of Clinical Imaging
Industry Standard Research (ISR), January 2012
The Clinical imaging market (like the Cardiac Safety / ECG market) is one of the more interesting clinical outsourcing markets we've evaluated. As one of the few frontiers where specialized service providers can effectively compete with the global, full service CROs, it is very important to understand the strengths and weaknesses of these providers and understand which services are going to needed in the near future.
WHAT YOU'LL LEARN
For Sponsors:
The use of imaging in clinical trials is not an everyday occurrence and your organization may not have had the opportunity to "try out" as many providers as you would like. This research provides you with a head-start in determining which service providers perform well and those that perform not-so-well in the areas you need the most assistance with.
For Service Providers:
You'll gain a better understanding of the current imaging services market, including how sponsors select providers and an assessment of your services as they are perceived by your customers.
Copyright and usage guidelines
Methodology
Introduction
Study Findings
High-level takeaways and implications
Sponsor organizations
Service provider selection: Peer pressure and inertia
Access to resources
Integration with clinical operations
The importance of on-time report delivery
Specialists and Provider selection
Service provider organizations
Differentiation strategies
Centralized readings
Clinical vs. Molecular imaging
Most used services: Core imaging
Most used services: Imaging-related
Imaging market dynamics
Future growth/ decline in Imaging study volume
Perceptions of service providers
Imaging outsource activity
Same provider for Imaging and Clinical operations
Service provider type preference
Medical/ scientific knowledge of the medical director/ imaging head
Quality/ reliability of the readings
On-time delivery of imaging reports
Low cost
Project management of the study
Integration with clinical operations
Technology/ equipment used
Summary of specialized imaging vs. multi-service CRO performance
Imaging service trends
Current and future service usage
Outsourced imaging-related services
Centralized vs. Decentralized study mix
Clinical vs. Molecular imaging distribution
Imaging Service Provider Selection
Service Provider Familiarity and Use
Satisfaction with product attributes
Multi-service CROs
Imaging-focused providers
Most preferred imaging service provider
Service gaps
Service improvements
Service attribute perceptual map (importance and satisfaction)
Study Data
Clinical Imaging Service Providers
Familiarity and use
Imaging study involvement
High-level Imaging familiarity
Imaging service provider familiarity
Imaging service provider experience
Service Provider Satisfaction
Most preferred imaging service provider
Why? Most preferred imaging service provider
Why? Most preferred service provider
Medical/ scientific knowledge of the medical director/ imaging head
Quality/ reliability of the readings
On-time delivery of imaging reports
Low cost
Project management of the study
Integration with clinical operations
Technology/ equipment used
Service Provider Performance Profiles
Charles River
PAREXEL/ Perceptive Informatics
CoreLab (RadPharm & Medifacts)
Covance Imaging
VirtualScopics
ICON Medical Imaging
Clinical Imaging Systems
BioClinica
Service Provider Attribute Importance
Most important attributes
Service improvements
Anticipated use of outsourced imaging-related services next 18 months
Imaging industry dynamics and trends
Imaging service provider usage
Imaging services used past 12 months
Imaging services growth next 24 months
Future growth/ decline in imaging study volume
Rationale for using imaging in clinical development
Centralized vs. Decentralized study mix
Preference for centralized vs. decentralized readings
Rationale for preferring a centralized approach
Rationale for preferring a decentralized approach
Clinical vs. Molecular imaging – current distribution
Clinical vs. Molecular imaging – future distribution
Outsourcing dynamics and trends
Service provider type preference
Perceptions of service providers
Same provider for imaging and Clinical operations
Imaging outsourcing penetration - current
Imaging outsourcing penetration – next 18 months
Respondent Demographics
Imaging decision-making profile
Therapeutic area responsibility
Organization type
Job title
Location: Headquarter & Office
Area(s) of responsibility
- ACR Image Metrix
- BioClinica
- Charles River
- Clinical Imaging Systems
- CoreLab
- Covance
- Eurofins
- ICON Medical Imaging
- Medpace
- MPI Research
- PAREXEL
- Prism Clinical Imaging
- VirtualScopics
- WorldCare Clinical
Product Samples
A sample for this product is available. Please Login/Register to download this sample.
Customers who bought this item also bought
All rights reserved. © Copyright 2013 Research and Markets WWW4
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Publishers Employment Opportunities Site Map Link to us Webmaster Affiliate Network
