Research and Markets


Printer Friendly

Printed from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/302154


Pharmaceutical Project and Portfolio Management: Effective Organization and Decision-Making For Long-Term Growth


Description: Pharmaceutical companies operate in multi-project, multi-product environments: the challenge facing pharmaceutical executives is to determine which projects - each potentially having a strong value proposition and being championed by different business units - should receive investment. Portfolio management aims to meet the challenges of operating in a multi-project/product environment by determining the optimal mix of projects and products within a portfolio.

Pharmaceutical Project and Portfolio Management: Effective organization and decision-making for long-term growth, is a strategic management report which provides expert analysis on budget and resource allocation decision-making, enabling you to convert promising product portfolios into highly profitable revenue streams. Recent trends in increased R&D spend and falling productivity levels have put increased pressure on managing the portfolio in order to maximize returns. Effective portfolio management will steer pharmaceutical companies through periods of slow growth and deliver shareholder confidence in future growth.

Key Questions answered in this report

- What are the main drivers of project and portfolio management in the pharmaceutical industry?
- What are current best practices in portfolio management processes?
- How do the various approaches to project evaluation differ?
- How can I apply evaluation techniques to my projects?
- Which project management strategies are leading companies using?
- Which portfolio management strategies are leading companies using?
- How can internal and external portfolios be combined?
- How can new portfolio management processes be developed and implemented?

Benefits of the report:

- Implement effective project and portfolio management processes in your company by reviewing worked examples of project evaluation techniques.

- Identify current industry best practices and benchmark your performance against leading pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies with portfolio management case studies from Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Genentech, Bristol-Myers Squibb and Aventis.

- Prepare for current and future industry trends set to influence existing processes by reviewing key contextual settings for portfolio management.

- Assess recommendations for effective portfolio management at corporate, R&D and marketing levels and make immediate improvements to your current processes.

- Develop a long term portfolio management strategy by analyzing opinions from portfolio management experts and implementing an optimal process which stops you pursuing unsuccessful pharmaceutical projects.


Contents: Executive summary

The portfolio management challenge
Portfolio management processes
Project evaluations
Portfolio management in practice
Project management in practice
Portfolio management in context

Chapter 1 The portfolio management challenge

Summary
Introduction

Pharmaceutical business environment
The rising cost of drug development
R&D productivity shortfall
Key drug patent expirations
Intensive regulatory processes
Healthcare cost containment
Investor confidence in the pharmaceutical sector reduced

Portfolio management - driving growth and shareholder value
Defining portfolio management
Key drivers of portfolio management
Corporate strategy and portfolio management
A dynamic feedback process
Portfolio management, corporate strategy and shareholder expectations
Portfolio management as a growth vehicle
Managing shareholder expectations through portfolio management
Enhancing corporate communications

Chapter 2 Portfolio management processes

Summary
Introduction

Integrated portfolio management
The R&D portfolio
The marketed portfolio

The portfolio management system

Organizational processes
Periodic portfolio reviews
Milestone reviews
Reactionary reviews
Combined review processes

Project evaluations

Analysis and decision-making
Efficiency measures

A balanced portfolio

Aligning portfolios and strategy
Top-down model
Bottom-up model
Top-down and bottom-up

Budgeting and resource management
Portfolio management best practices

Chapter 3 Project evaluations

Summary
Introduction
The project management discipline
The project evaluation process
Project identification
Project evaluation
Scoring methods

Project value and risk profile
Measuring value
Risk assessments

Financial evaluation techniques

Net present value
NPV – a worked example

Decision tree analysis
Expected NPV – a worked example

Monte Carlo simulations

Real options
Real options valuation

Portfolio evaluation best practices
Establishing a 'level playing field' for project evaluations
Improving risk assessment
Increasing the sophistication of financial evaluations

Chapter 4 Portfolio management in practice

Summary
Introduction
Case study: Portfolio management-led growth at Novartis
Case study: Prioritization in portfolio development at Genentech
Case study: Portfolio and resource management at Bristol-Myers Squibb
Case study: Small company portfolio management at PowderJect
Case study: Portfolio planning, strategy and risk management at Aventis

Chapter 5 Project management in practice

Summary
Introduction
Case study: Integrated project planning and budgeting at Roche
Case study: The mid-tier company approach to project management at Schering AG
Case study: Project management in new product development at GlaxoSmithKline
Case study: Project management support at AstraZeneca
Case study: Project manager development at Amgen

Chapter 6 Portfolio management in context

Summary
Introduction
Managing a portfolio of external assets
Portfolio management through licensing contracts
Globalizing the portfolio management process
Post-merger integration of portfolio management approaches

Industry best practice: An interview with Richard Bayney, Vice President, Portfolio Planning, J&J Pharmaceutical Research & Development
Interview transcript
Aligning the portfolio with top-level strategy
Project versus portfolio management
Sophisticated portfolio evaluation tools
Strategic versus financial evaluations
Adapting portfolio management to industry trends
Integrating internal and external portfolio management
Critical success factors

Chapter 7 Appendix

Glossary
Sources

List of Figures

Figure 1.1: R&D expenditure for PhRMA members, 1980-2004
Figure 1.2: Increasing cost of drug development, 1975-2000
Figure 1.3: R&D productivity trends, 1990-2004
Figure 1.4: US patent expirations for top-10 leading drugs, 2004
Figure 1.5: Portfolio management enables both the implementation and development of corporate strategy
Figure 1.6: Portfolio management as a driver of shareholder value
Figure 2.7: A "portfolio of portfolios" – integrated portfolio management
Figure 2.8: Integrated internal and external portfolio management
Figure 2.9: Milestone review process
Figure 2.10: The portfolio management process
Figure 2.11: Project utilization based on efficiency measures
Figure 2.12: Portfolio optimization over time
Figure 2.13: Portfolio balance – risk versus return
Figure 2.14: Top-down approach to resource allocation
Figure 2.15: Managing resources over time
Figure 3.16: Project rankings by attractiveness scores
Figure 3.17: Risk assessments – a distribution of potential outcomes
Figure 3.18: Risk assessment in project evaluations
Figure 3.19: Risk assessment in practice
Figure 3.20: Net present value of an R&D project
Figure 3.21: Decision tree analysis for pharmaceutical projects
Figure 3.22: Expected NPV of an R&D project
Figure 3.23: Expected NPV versus Monte Carlo simulation
Figure 3.24: Decision tree analysis and Monte Carlo simulations
Figure 3.25: Monte Carlo simulation outcomes
Figure 3.26: Expected NPV of an R&D project incorporating an abandonment option
Figure 4.27: An example of the decision-making process found at Novartis
Figure 4.28: An example of the cross-option comparison charts used at Genentech
Figure 4.29: An example of the multi-value measure rankings used at Genentech
Figure 4.30: An example of the aggregate demand charts used at BMS
Figure 4.31: An example of the R&D portfolio management process employed at PowderJect
Figure 4.32: An example of the management of risk with respect to near-term value at Aventis
Figure 5.33: An example of the decision-making structure at Schering AG
Figure 5.34: An example of project management commissioning at Schering AG
Figure 5.35: An example of key project management objectives at GlaxoSmithKline
Figure 5.36: An example of the initial PMSO organization at AstraZeneca
Figure 5.37: An example of project organization in a large biotechnology company such as Amgen
Figure 6.38: Clinical survival rates for internally developed and licensed compounds
Figure 6.39: The value of option 1 in GSK's Theravance agreement
Figure 6.40: The value of option 2 in GSK's Theravance agreement
Figure 6.41: A global development study for Iressa
Figure 6.42: J&J's sales and earnings, 1994-2004
Figure 6.43: J&J's portfolio of potential new filings, 2005-2011
Figure 6.44: J&J's portfolio of potential new filings, 2005-2011 (cont'd)

List of Tables

Table 2.1: Investment efficiency
Table 3.2: Project scoring model
Table 3.3: Expected NPV of an R&D project



Summary: Key Findings of the Report

- The critical success factors in portfolio management are identified through a unique interview with Richard Bayney, Vice President, Portfolio Planning, J&J Pharmaceutical Research & Development.

- The use of financial tools in evaluations has to be balanced by additional analytical approaches that are capable of capturing the complexity of projects and decision-making in order to achieve optimal portfolio management.

- External licensing projects must be integrated into internal portfolio management processes. For small biotechnology companies, this often involves an integration of licensing and portfolio management policies.

- Portfolio balance will become increasingly important in the management process as analytical approaches combining project specific data are used to provide more accurate representations of the entire portfolio to decision makers.

- At Aventis a great deal of importance is placed on risk management in the portfolio management process. Taking a 5-year, near-term value analysis helps the company to identify key risks in their portfolio and create appropriate prioritization groupings of potential development
projects.


Companies Mentioned - Novartis - Genentech - Bristol-Myers Squibb - PowderJect - Aventis - Roche - Schering AG - GlaxoSmithKline - AstraZeneca - Amgen


Ordering: Order Online - visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/302154

Order by Fax - using the order form below

Order By Post - print the order form below and send to

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.


Research and Markets Page 1 of 2
Printed 29/11/2009 20:41:37
Fax Order Form
To place an order via fax simply print this form, fill in the information below and fax the completed form to
646-607-1907 (from USA) or +353 1 6849977 (from Rest of World). If you have any questions please email help@researchandmarkets.net

Order information
Please verify that the product information is correct and select the format you require.
Product Name:
Pharmaceutical Project and Portfolio Management: Effective Organization and Decision-Making For Long-Term Growth

Web Address:
http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/302154

Office Code:
OC8HJNPOUMUXU

Report formats
Please enter the quantity of the report format you require.

Format Quantity Price
Hard Copy €1,995.00 + EUR€ 50.00 Shipping/Handling *
Electronic €1,931.00
* Shipping/Handling is only charged once per order.


Contact information
Please enter all the information below in BLOCK CAPITALS.

First Name:   Last Name:  
Email Address:
Job Title:
Organisation:
Address:
City:
Postal/Zip Code:
Country:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:


Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)
Research and Markets Page 2 of 2
Printed 29/11/2009 20:41:37


Payment information

Please indicate the payment method you would like to use by selecting the appropriate box.

 Pay by Credit Card:
American Express
Diners Club
Master Card
Visa
Cardholder's Name:
Cardholder's Signature:
Expiry Date: /
Card Number:
CVV Security Code:
Issue Date: /   (Diners Club only)


 Pay by Check:
Please post the check, accompanied by this form, to:

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.


 Pay by Wire Transfer:
Please transfer funds to:

Account number: 83313083
Sort code: 98-53-30
Swift code: ULSBIE2D
IBAN number: IE78ULSB98533083313083
Bank Address: Ulster Bank,
27-35 Main St,
Blackrock,
Co. Dublin,
Ireland.
If you have a Marketing Code please enter it below:
Marketing Code:


Please note that by ordering from Research and Markets you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions at http://www.researchandmarkets.com/info/terms.asp

Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)