 |
Printer Friendly
Printed from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/317880
Wireless Service Level Agreements: What Buyers Say
|
Description: |
The Service Level Agreement (SLA) continues to increase in importance in the corporate wireless provider selection process, according to our October 2005 survey of more than 600 corporate contract decision-makers. While the SLA is still most important to the large enterprise-sized businesses, the SLA ranked sixth across companies of all sizes in 2005, up from seventh in the 2004 survey. This move was slowed by the interest in Global Roaming Plans, which was a new decision factor topping most customer segment rankings this year. As wireless carriers work to differentiate their enterprise offerings, corporate buyers were asked to identify the most important decision factors beyond the critical three (price, service quality, and geographic coverage) when selecting a preferred provider. This report identifies where the SLA ranks in importance depending on company size, vertical market, and who is involved in the decision making process. |
|
Contents: |
Executive Summary Methodology Introduction US Corporate Wireless Usage The SLA Fit in the Wireless Package
Voice Service SLAs
Data Service SLAs
Other Key Satisfaction Factors: Customer View
SLA Importance as a Decision Factor
SLA Importance by Company Size
SLA Importance by Decision-Maker
Key Desired SLA Attributes Service Provider View Service Provider SLA Profiles Conclusion List of Tables Table 1. SLA Importance Ranking by Company Size, 2004 and 2005 Table 2. Average Percentage of Employees Using Wireless Voice Services, by Company Size, 2004 and 2005 Table 3. Average Percentage of Employees Using Wireless Data Services, by Company Size, 2004 and 2005 Table 4. Top Decision Factors for Large Businesses (Employees with 1,000+ Employees), 2005 Table 5. SLA Importance Ranking by Company Size, 2004 and 2005 Table 6. SLA Importance Ranking by Vertical Market, 2005 Table 7. SLA Importance by Decision-Maker Involvement, 2005 Table 8. Importance of SLA Commitments as Purchase Criteria, by Company Size, 2005 Table 9. Importance of SLA Commitments as Purchase Criteria, by Company Size, 2004 Table 10. Sprint Nextel’s Voice SLA Commitments Table 11. US Wireless Carrier SLA Status, 2005 List of Figures Figure 1. SLA Importance as a Decision Factor, All Respondents, 2005 Figure 2. SLA Importance as a Decision Factor, All Respondents, 2005 Figure 3. SLA Importance as a Decision Factor, All Respondents, 2005 vs. 2004 Figure 4. Importance of SLA Commitments as Purchase Criteria, by Company Size, 2005
|
|
Summary: |
The Service Level Agreement (SLA) continues to increase in importance in the corporate wireless provider selection process, according to the October 2005 survey of more than 600 corporate contract decision-makers. While the SLA is still most important to the large enterprise-sized businesses, the SLA ranked sixth across companies of all sizes in 2005, up from seventh in the 2004 survey. This move was slowed by the interest in Global Roaming Plans, which was a new decision factor topping most customer segment rankings this year. As wireless carriers work to differentiate their enterprise offerings, corporate buyers were asked to identify the most important decision factors beyond the critical three (price, service quality, and geographic coverage) when selecting a preferred provider. This report identifies where the SLA ranks in importance depending on company size, vertical market, and who is involved in the decision making process. |
|
Ordering: |
Order Online - visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/317880
Order by Fax - using the order form below
Order By Post - print the order form below and send to
 |
Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.
|
|
|
 |
Page 1 of 2 Printed 28/11/2009 20:20:09 |
|
Fax Order Form
To place an order via fax simply print this form, fill in the information below and
fax the completed form to
646-607-1907 (from USA) or +353 1 6849977 (from Rest of World). If you have any questions please email help@researchandmarkets.net
Order information
Please verify that the product information is correct and select the format you require.
|
|
|
Product Name: |
Wireless Service Level Agreements: What Buyers Say
|
|
Web Address: |
http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/317880
|
|
Office Code: |
|
OC8HJNPOUMUXU
|
Report formats
Please enter the quantity of the report format you require.
|
|
Format
|
Quantity
|
Price
|
|
Electronic
|
|
€2,011.00
|
Contact information
Please enter all the information below in BLOCK CAPITALS.
 |
|
First Name: |
Last Name: |
|
Email Address: |
 |
|
Job Title: |
 |
|
Organisation: |
 |
|
Address: |
 |
|
City: |
 |
|
Postal/Zip Code: |
 |
|
Country: |
 |
|
Phone Number: |
 |
|
Fax Number: |
 |
|
Please fax this form to: (646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA) +353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)
 |
Page 2 of 2 Printed 28/11/2009 20:20:09
|
|
Payment information
Please indicate the payment method you would like to use by selecting the appropriate
box.
|
|
|
|
American Express
|
|
Diners Club
|
|
Master Card
|
|
Visa
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Cardholder's Name: |
 |
|
|
|
Cardholder's Signature: |
 |
|
|
|
Expiry Date: |
/  |
|
|
|
Card Number: |
 |
|
|
|
CVV Security Code: |
 |
|
|
|
Issue Date: |
/ (Diners
Club only)
|
|
|
|
 |
Please post the check, accompanied by this form, to:
Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.
|
|
 |
|
 |
Please transfer funds to:
 |
|
Account number: |
83313083 |
|
Sort code: |
98-53-30 |
|
Swift code: |
ULSBIE2D |
|
IBAN number: |
IE78ULSB98533083313083 |
|
Bank Address: |
Ulster Bank,
27-35 Main St,
Blackrock,
Co. Dublin,
Ireland. |
|
|
|
If you have a Marketing Code please enter it below:
|
|
|
Marketing Code: |
 |
|
Please note that by ordering from Research and Markets you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions at http://www.researchandmarkets.com/info/terms.asp
|
|
Please fax this form to: (646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA) +353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)
|
 |
 |
|
|