- Published: January 2003
- Region: United Kingdom
An Examination of the Worldwide Digital Cable Settop Box Sector - Home Gateway 2002: Worldwide Cable Market Forecast for Digital Settops and Related VOD, PVR and ITV Services 2002-2005
- Published: January 2002
- Multimedia Research Group (MRG, Inc)
Home Gateway 2002: Worldwide Cable Market Forecast for Digital Settops and Related VOD, PVR and ITV Services - 2002-2005 reflects how the global cable business is responding to the threat from digital satellite.
This report clocks the growth of worldwide digital cable settops (STBs), VOD streams, and PVRs, including both unit and revenue growth for 2002 through 2005.
Networked PVRs and related business plans are also included.
By showing ROI scenarios for deploying Svod, VOD and PVRs, the report reveals how a cable operator can reach profitability in 12-18 months by adding these services.
The report also provides in-depth analysis of Cable operator preferences, strategies and plans for testing, "trialing" and deploying basic digital and advanced digital platforms like VOD, Svod, and PVRs.
Cable operators interviewed include major MSOs (Multi-System Operators) Time Warner Cable, AT&T Broadband, Cox, Comcast, Rogers, Shaw, Telewest, TV Cabo, NTL, Liberty, Charter, AuStar, Sarft, and many others. Major global suppliers interviewed include NDS , TiVo, Motorola, Microsoft, Pace, Thomson, SeaChange, Diva, Concurrent, nCube, Moxi, Scientific-Atlanta, Sonicblue, CacheVision, and many others.
Over 50 representative MSOs and supplier companies are also profiled in this report.
Chapter 1 Industry Overview <BR>1.1 Economic/Industry Developments <BR>1.1.1 Negative <BR>1.1.2 Positive <BR> <BR>Chapter 2 VOD & PVR: Competitive or Complimentary?<BR>2.1 VOD Categories <BR>2.1.2 Service/Revenue Classifications <BR>2.2 PVR Categories <BR>2.2.1 Standalone<BR>2.2.2 Integrated with Satellite STBs (Receivers)<BR>2.2.3 Integrated with Cable STB<BR>2.2.4 Integrated with PC<BR>2.2.4 When Do PVRs/PVCs Work Best?<BR>2.2.5 When Does VOD Work Best?<BR>2.2.6 Capital budgets sufficient for centralized servers<BR>2.2.7 VOD/PVR Competition<BR>2.3 PVR vs. VOD <BR>2.4 PVR vs. NVOD <BR>2.5 PVR vs. SVOD<BR>2.6 VOD/PVR Cooperation <BR>2.6.1 NVOD integrated with PVR = Distributed VOD (DVOD) <BR> <BR>Chapter 3 The Cable TV Industry<BR>3.1 The Digital Landscape<BR>3.1.1 HFC upgrade rates and capacity<BR>3.1.2 Digital Penetration and take rates<BR>3.1.3 Market drivers<BR>3.1.4 Market barriers<BR>3.1.5 Regulatory landscape<BR>3.1.6 Competitive landscape<BR>3.1.7 Standards issues<BR>3.2 The Cable VOD Opportunity <BR>3.2.1 Trials underway<BR>3.2.2 Current installed base and take rates <BR>3.2.3 Market drivers<BR>3.2.4 Market barriers<BR>3.2.5 Regulatory landscape<BR>3.2.6 Competitive landscape<BR><BR>Chapter 4 Worldwide Digital Cable Subscribers, Forecast 2002-2005<BR>4.1 Global Drivers of Digital Cable<BR>4.1.1 Worldwide drivers of digital cable<BR>4.1.2 North America and Europe Overview<BR>4.1.3 Share of worldwide digital cable mkts. - Who has it and who's getting it? <BR>4.1.4 Overview of North American and European Market Overview 2002-2005<BR>4.1.5 Latin America/Asia Overview<BR>4.1.6 Overview of Emerging Dig Cable STB Mkts: Latin America<BR>4.1.7 Overview of Emerging Digital Cable STB Mkts: Asia<BR>4.2 Growth within Regions by MSO: North American and European Digital Cable Subs - 2002-2005 <BR>4.2.1 N.A. DigCable Subs (by MSO) <BR>4.2.2 European Dig Cable Subs - MSO Positioning <BR>4.2.3 Penetration - Europe <BR>4.2.3 Latin American Digital Cable Subs (by Country) <BR>4.2.4 Asian & Australian Digital Cable Subs <BR> <BR>Chapter 5 The Digital Cable STB Industry <BR>5.1 Current Mkt Share by Manufacturer (DigCable STBs)<BR>5.2 Typical Cable STB Feature List: 2002, 2003 and 2006 <BR><BR>Chapter 6 The VOD Industry<BR>6.1.1 VOD Drivers<BR>6.2 Industry VOD Streams Shipment Forecast, 2002-2006<BR>6.2.1 Worldwide<BR>6.2.2 By region<BR>6.3 Revenue Forecast, 2002-2006 <BR>6.3.1 Worldwide<BR>6.3.2 By region<BR><BR>Chapter 7 The PVR Industry <BR>7.1 Worldwide & Regional Cable-related PVR Units and Revenue <BR>7.2 Things a PVR is not<BR>7.3 MSO ROI Scenarios w/VOD & PVR (Models #1-3) <BR><BR>Chapter 8 Directory of Representative MSOs <BR>8.1 North America - U.S. <BR>8.1.1 Time Warner Cable <BR>8.1.2 AT&T Broadband <BR>8.1.3 Adelphia <BR>8.1.4 Cablevision <BR>8.1.5 Charter <BR>8.1.6 Comcast <BR>8.1.7 Cox Communications <BR>8.1.8 Insight Communications <BR>8.1.9 Mediacom LLC <BR>8.2 North America - Canada<BR>8.2.1 Shaw <BR>8.3 European MSOs <BR>8.3.1 Telewest (United Kingdom) <BR>8.3.2 NTL (United Kingdom) <BR>8.3.3 France Telecom (France) <BR>8.3.4 Noos (France) <BR>8.3.5 UPC (Pan-Europe) <BR>8.3.6 Callahan (Pan-Europe) <BR>8.3.7 Canal Plus (Pan-Europe) <BR>8.3.8 ONO (Spain) <BR>8.3.9 UnitedGlobalCom <BR>8.3.10 Telenor Avidi (Norway) <BR>8.3.11 Denmark (TDC Kabe/ONCable) <BR> <BR>Chapter 9 Supplier Directory<BR>9.1 Cable STB Suppliers <BR>9.1.1 Motorola BCS <BR>9.1.2 Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. <BR>9.1.3 Pace Micro Technology<BR>9.1.4 Pioneer Corporation<BR>9.1.5 Sony Corporation<BR>9.1.6 Panasonic Technologies<BR>9.1.7 Samsung<BR>9.1.8 ADB<BR>9.1.9 Others<BR>9.2 VOD Suppliers <BR>9.2.1 Concurrent Computer <BR>9.2.2 DIVA Systems<BR>9.2.3 nCube<BR>9.2.4 SeaChange<BR>9.2.5 Intertainer<BR>9.2.6 Others<BR>9.2.7 Captive Suppliers <BR> <BR>Tables and Charts <BR>T-3.1: Ave. and Median Numbers of Subscribers per MSO Surveyed <BR>T-3.2: Percentage of Systems Upgraded to HFC <BR>C-3.1: Percentage of Systems Upgraded to HFC <BR>C-3.2: Current Bandwidth of HFC Systems <BR>C-3.3: Target HFC Bandwidth at 100% Buildout <BR>C-3.4: Digital Penetration - Eligible vs. Actual Subscribers <BR>C-3.5: Projected Percentage of Eligible Subs Taking Digital Cable<BR>T-3.3: Total and Ave. Number of Digital STBs installed (End of 2001)<BR>T-3.4: Ave. Ratios of Digital STBs to Households <BR>C-3.6: Reasons for Consumers to Subscribe to Digital Cable<BR>C-3.7: Reasons for Consumers to Reject Digital Cable <BR>T-3.5: VOD Trials (U.S.) <BR>C-3.8: How Long Until MSOs Deploy VOD<BR>T-3.6: Digital cable subscribers per system vendor <BR>C-3.9: VOD Revenue Models <BR>C-3.10: Reasons for Consumers to Take VOD Servic<BR>C-3.11: Reasons for Consumers to Reject VOD <BR>T-4.1: Typical Digital Service Sequence <BR>T-4.2: WW Market Size for Digital Cable, Cable, and VOD Potential<BR>T-4.3: Overview of N.A. and European Digital Cable and Potential VOD Markets - 2002-2005<BR>C-4.1: N.A. vs. Europe Total Digital Cable Subs <BR>C-4.2: N.A. vs. Europe Total Cable Subs <BR>C-4.3: N.A. vs. Europe New Digital STB Units Sold (M)<BR>C-4.4: N.A. vs. Europe Installed Base DigCable STBs (M)<BR>C-4.5: Worldwide VOD Potential revenue<BR>C-4.6: N.A. vs. Europe Potential VOD revenue <BR>T-4.4: Overview of Latin America/Asia Cable, Dig Cable Mkts - 2002-2005 <BR>T-4.5: US Digital Cable Subscribers by MSO 2002-2005<BR>T-4.6: Canadian Digital Cable Subs by MSO 2002-2005<BR>T-4.7: N.A. Digital Cable Subscribers - Summary - 2002-2005 <BR>T-4.8: European Digital Cable Subscribers 2002-2005 <BR>T-4.9: Latin American Digital Cable Subscribers 2002-2005 <BR>T-4.11: Asia Digital Cable Subscribers 2002-2005 <BR>C-5.1: % of Digital Cable STBs Installed by Vendor (N.A. Only)<BR>C-5.2: N.A. Market Share of Digital Cable STB Vendors (including Sony Estimate)<BR>C-5.3: % of DigCable STBs Installed by Vendor (Worldwide) <BR>C-5.4: % of Total N.A. Digital Cable STB Market Share (As Reported by Vendors)<BR>T-5.1: Typical Cable STB Features: 2002<BR>T-5.2: Typical Cable STB Features: 2003<BR>T-5.3: Typical Cable STB Features: 2006<BR>T-5.4: W.W./Regional Digital Cable STB Unit/Revenues: 2002-2005<BR>C-6.1: Reasons for MSOs to Select VOD Vendors<BR>C-6.2: % of Cable Systems with VOD (End of 2001)<BR>C-6.3: # of Cable Systems with VOD (by vendor)<BR>C-6.4: Market Share of VOD Systems (Hours of Content and 3 Mbps Streams, as reported by MSOs)<BR>T 5.5 Worldwide/Regional VOD Mkt Size 2002-2005<BR>C-7.1: Reasons for Consumers to Buy PVRs<BR>C-7.2: Reasons for Consumers to Reject PVRs (MSO Viewpoint)<BR>C-7.3: Percentage of MSOs Currently Testing or Deploying PVRs<BR>C-7.4: Percentage of MSOs Planning to Deploy PVRs <BR>C-7.5: When do MSOs Plan to Deploy PVRs?<BR>C-7.6: Types of PVRs Being Tested or Deployed by MSOs<BR>T-7.1: Worldwide/Regional Cable-related PVR Units Rev - 2002 2005<BR>T-7.2: Must-Have Features for basic combined digital-cable PVR/STB (2002-2004)<BR>T-7.3: PVR Comparison with Other Products <BR>T-7.4: ROI Model #1 for VOD for 1000 streams (10k subs)<BR>T-7.5: ROI Model #2 for PVR Sold or Leased (50%50%)10k units<BR>T-7.6: ROI Model #3 for PVR Sold or Leased (50%50%)10k unit<BR>