|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
2009/2010 United States Manufacturers Data Report
The MPI Group, June 2009, Pages: 242
Looking for fast, relevant and easy-to-use benchmark data on U.S. manufacturing? This 250+ page digital guide is perfect!
Organized by chapters, you’ll see every metric from our latest U.S. Manufacturing Study data from over 275 plants located across the U.S. showing these comparisons:
- Public vs. Private
- Nature of manufacturing Operations
- Years since plant startup
- Corporate-parent annual revenues
- Plant revenues
- Volume and product mix
-- High volume/high mix
-- High volume/low mix
-- Low volume/high mix
-- low
- Number of employees
-- Less than 50
-- 50-99
-- 100-250
-- More than 250
-- U.S.
- Union representation
-- None
-- Some
-- All
-- U.S.
- World-class manufacturing status
-- No progress
-- Some progress
-- Significant/Full Progress
-- All of the U.S.
The 2009/2010 United States Manufacturers Data Report presents manufacturing-plant-level data from the MPI Manufacturing Study. Each chapter in the 2009/2010 United States Manufacturers Data Report includes a right-hand column for all participating U.S. manufacturers, as well as columns for major cross-tabulations of the findings (e.g., Number of Employees). Within each chapter, data appears in a sequence similar to that presented to study respondents, working through five sections: Plant Profile, Human Resources, Operations, Supply Chain and Capacity/Equipment/IT.
Presentation of Data:
Survey questions consisted of directive single-answer questions for which respondents were asked to “check one” answer category; directive multiple answer questions for which respondents were asked to “check all that apply”; and open-ended numeric questions for which respondents were asked to respond with a number. The tables and charts in this report for “check one” and “check all” answer categories are presented either in the format presented on the survey or, where more meaningful, in descending order based on the percentage of responses for a particular answer category (i.e., the answer category with the highest percentage is listed first).
Data for directive questions list the frequency (N) and the percentage of responses for each answer category. The tables for open-ended questions are presented with the frequency (N), median, average, 75th percentile, and 25th percentile statistics. The median is the “typical” measure, not distorted by a few unusually high or low values that may exist in the sample due to special circumstances. The median figure represents the mid-point of the figures for a particular measure, with one-half of respondents reporting figures above it and one-half below. The 25th percentile is the value below which 25% of answers fall. The 75th percentile is the value below which 75% of answers fall. Where a lower measure is considered the better performance, such as with annual labor turnover, the 25th percentile and 75th percentile statistics have been reversed in this Report; i.e., the 75th percentile represents the lower (better) figure.
“ISD” (insufficient data) is indicated in order to retain respondent anonymity for cross-tabulations of questions that resulted in small sample sizes.
Where “Current Year” and “Three Years Ago” metrics were sought, MPI generally provides data on the change on a per-plant basis: Each plant’s individual year-to-year change is calculated, and then combined with all others; from this resulting array of data, a median, average, and percentiles are calculated. Where the metric was an absolute value (e.g., hours), the percentage change is provided; where the original current- or three-year metric sought was a percentage, a percentage-point change is provided.
Product samples
Samples for this product is available. Please Login/Register to download these samples.
Customers who bought this item also bought
2009/2010 Manufacturers Executive Summary
2008 Mexico Manufacturers Data Report
2008 Machinery Manufacturers Data Report
2008 Chemical Manufacturers Data Report
US household income comparison in dollars for each of five income percentile categories for 1970, 1975, 1980, 1985, 1990, 1995 and 2000, with median income
2008 Transportation Equipment Manufacturers Data Report
2008 Fabricated Metal Manufacturers Data Report
2008 Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturers Data Report
Good Clinical Practice: A Question and Answer Reference Guide 2009
Three Critical Mobility Questions IT Leaders Must Answer
US top 25 chemical companies ranked by brand equity as a percentage of market capitalization as of fourth-quarter 2002, with brand equity dollar value and percentile for each firm
Paid Music Content: The Answer Is Blowin� in the Cloud
|
|
|
|
