Printer Friendly

Printed from http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/488063

The 2007-2012 Outlook for Electric and Microwave Household Cooking Units and Parts in Japan

Description:
WHAT IS LATENT DEMAND AND THE P.I.E.?

The concept of latent demand is rather subtle. The term latent typically refers to something that is dormant, not observable, or not yet realized. Demand is the notion of an economic quantity that a target population or market requires under different assumptions of price, quality, and distribution, among other factors. Latent demand, therefore, is commonly defined by economists as the industry earnings of a market when that market becomes accessible and attractive to serve by competing firms. It is a measure, therefore, of potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) or total revenues (not profit) if Japan is served in an efficient manner. It is typically expressed as the total revenues potentially extracted by firms. The “market” is defined at a given level in the value chain. There can be latent demand at the retail level, at the wholesale level, the manufacturing level, and the raw materials level (the P.I.E. of higher levels of the value chain being always smaller than the P.I.E. of levels at lower levels of the same value chain, assuming all levels maintain minimum profitability).

The latent demand for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts in Japan is not actual or historic sales. Nor is latent demand future sales. In fact, latent demand can be either lower or higher than actual sales if a market is inefficient (i.e., not representative of relatively competitive levels). Inefficiencies arise from a number of factors, including the lack of international openness, cultural barriers to consumption, regulations, and cartel-like behavior on the part of firms. In general, however, latent demand is typically larger than actual sales in a market.

For reasons discussed later, this report does not consider the notion of “unit quantities”, only total latent revenues (i.e., a calculation of price times quantity is never made, though one is implied). The units used in this report are U.S. dollars not adjusted for inflation (i.e., the figures incorporate inflationary trends). If inflation rates vary in a substantial way compared to recent experience, actually sales can also exceed latent demand (not adjusted for inflation). On the other hand, latent demand can be typically higher than actual sales as there are often distribution inefficiencies that reduce actual sales below the level of latent demand.

As mentioned in the introduction, this study is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. In fact, all the current products or services on the market can cease to exist in their present form (i.e., at a brand-, R&D specification, or corporate-image level) and all the players can be replaced by other firms (i.e., via exits, entries, mergers, bankruptcies, etc.), and there will still be latent demand for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts at the aggregate level. Product and service offerings, and the actual identity of the players involved, while important for certain issues, are relatively unimportant for estimates of latent demand.

THE METHODOLOGY

In order to estimate the latent demand for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts across the prefectures and cites of Japan, we used a multi-stage approach. Before applying the approach, one needs a basic theory from which such estimates are created. In this case, we heavily rely on the use of certain basic economic assumptions. In particular, there is an assumption governing the shape and type of aggregate latent demand functions. Latent demand functions relate the income of a prefecture, city, household, or individual to realized consumption. Latent demand (often realized as consumption when an industry is efficient), at any level of the value chain, takes place if an equilibrium is realized. For firms to serve a market, they must perceive a latent demand and be able to serve that demand at a minimal return. The single most important variable determining consumption, assuming latent demand exists, is income (or other financial resources at higher levels of the value chain). Other factors that can pivot or shape demand curves include external or exogenous shocks (i.e., business cycles), and or changes in utility for the product in question.

Ignoring, for the moment, exogenous shocks and variations in utility across geographies, the aggregate relation between income and consumption has been a central theme in economics. The figure below concisely summarizes one aspect of problem. In the 1930s, John Meynard Keynes conjectured that as incomes rise, the average propensity to consume would fall. The average propensity to consume is the level of consumption divided by the level of income, or the slope of the line from the origin to the consumption function. He estimated this relationship empirically and found it to be true in the short-run (mostly based on cross-sectional data). The higher the income, the lower the average propensity to consume. This type of consumption function is labeled "A" in the figure below (note the rather flat slope of the curve). In the 1940s, another macroeconomist, Simon Kuznets, estimated long-run consumption functions which indicated that the marginal propensity to consume was rather constant (using time series data). This type of consumption function is shown as "B" in the figure below (note the higher slope and zero-zero intercept). The average propensity to consume is constant.

















Is it declining or is it constant? A number of other economists, notably Franco Modigliani and Milton Friedman, in the 1950s (and Irving Fisher earlier), explained why the two functions were different using various assumptions on intertemporal budget constraints, savings, and wealth. The shorter the time horizon, the more consumption can depend on wealth (earned in previous years) and business cycles. In the long-run, however, the propensity to consume is more constant. Similarly, in the long run, households with no income eventually have no consumption (wealth is depleted). While the debate surrounding beliefs about how income and consumption are related is interesting, in this study a very particular school of thought is adopted. In particular, we are considering the latent demand for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts across the prefectures and cities of Japan. The smallest cities have few inhabitants. we assume that all of these cities fall along a "long-run" aggregate consumption function. This long-run function applies despite some of these prefectures having wealth; current income dominates the latent demand for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts. So, latent demand in the long-run has a zero intercept. However, we allow different propensities to consume (including being on consumption functions with differing slopes, which can account for differences in industrial organization, and end-user preferences).

Given this overriding philosophy, we will now describe the methodology used to create the latent demand estimates for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts in Japan. Since this methodology has been applied to a large number of categories, the rather academic discussion below is general and can be applied to a wide variety of categories and geographic locations, not just electric and microwave household cooking units and parts in Japan.

Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection

Any study of latent demand requires that some standard be established to define “efficiently served”. Having implemented various alternatives and matched these with market outcomes, we have found that the optimal approach is to assume that certain key indicators are more likely to reflect efficiency than others. These indicators are given greater weight than others in the estimation of latent demand compared to others for which no known data are available. Of the many alternatives, we have found the assumption that the highest aggregate income and highest income-per-capita markets reflect the best standards for “efficiency”. High aggregate income alone is not sufficient (i.e. some cities have high aggregate income, but low income per capita and can not assumed to be efficient). Aggregate income can be operationalized in a number of ways, including gross domestic product (for industrial categories), or total disposable income (for household categories; population times average income per capita, or number of households times average household income).

Latent demand is therefore estimated using data collected for relatively efficient markets from independent data sources (e.g. Official Chinese Agencies, the World Resources Institute, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, various agencies from the United Nations, industry trade associations, the International Monetary Fund, Euromonitor, Mintel, Thomson Financial Services, the U.S. Industrial Outlook, and the World Bank). Depending on original data sources used, the definition of “electric and microwave household cooking units and parts” is established. In the case of this report, the data were reported at the aggregate level, with no further breakdown or definition. In other words, any potential product or service that might be incorporated within electric and microwave household cooking units and parts falls under this category. Public sources rarely report data at the disaggregated level in order to protect private information from individual firms that might dominate a specific product-market. These sources will therefore aggregate across components of a category and report only the aggregate to the public. While private data are certainly available, this report only relies on public data at the aggregate level without reliance on the summation of various category components. In other words, this report does not aggregate a number of components to arrive at the “whole”. Rather, it starts with the “whole”, and estimates the whole for all prefectures and cities in Japan (without needing to know the specific parts that went into the whole in the first place).

Given this caveat, this study covers “electric and microwave household cooking units and parts” as defined by the NAICS coding system (pronounced “nakes”). For a complete definition of electric and microwave household cooking units and parts, please see below. The NAICS code for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts is 3352211. It is for this definition of electric and microwave household cooking units and parts that the aggregate latent demand estimates are derived for the prefectures and cities of Japan. “Electric and microwave household cooking units and parts” is specifically defined as follows:

3352211
Electric and microwave household cooking units and parts

33522111
Electric (including microwave) household ranges, ovens, surface cooking units, and equipment

3352211110
Electric (including microwave) household ranges, ovens, surface cooking units, and equipment

33522112
Parts and accessories for electric household ranges and ovens (including burners, rotisseries, oven racks, broiler pans, etc.) (sold separately)

3352211290
Parts and accessories for electric household ranges and ovens (including burners, rotisseries, oven racks, broiler pans, etc.) (sold separately)

33522113
Free standing ranges, including apartment house types

3352211311
Electric household ranges, free~standing, under 23 inches (58.4 cm) in width, all types, including apartment house type

3352211313
Electric household ranges, free~standing, 23 inches (58.4 cm) up to and including 32(81.3 cm) inches in width

3352211315
Electric household ranges, free~standing, 33 inches (83.8 cm) and over in width, all types

33522114
Other electric and electronic ranges and ovens

3352211417
Electric household ranges, other than free~standing, with single built~in oven

3352211419
Electric household ranges, other than free~standing, with two built~in ovens

3352211421
Electric household ranges, other than free~standing, with built~in surface cooking tops

3352211423
Electric household ranges, other than free~standing, with drop~in ranges

3352211429
Other electric and electronic ranges and ovens not listed above

3352211431
Parts and accessories for electric household ranges and ovens, such as burners, rotisseries, oven racks, broiler pans, etc., sold separately

33522115
Microwave ranges and ovens

3352211525
Microwave ranges and ovens (combination electric ranges and built~in ovens which utilize microwave and electric thermo energy in one or more of the oven cavities)

3352211527
Microwave ovens, including counter top, built~in and wall or cabinet hung ovens



Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing

Based on the aggregate view of electric and microwave household cooking units and parts as defined above, data were then collected for as many geographic locations as possible for that same definition, at the same level of the value chain. This generates a convenience sample of indicators from which comparable figures are available. If the series in question do not reflect the same accounting period, then adjustments are made. In order to eliminate short-term effects of business cycles, the series are smoothed using an 2 year moving average weighting scheme (longer weighting schemes do not substantially change the results). If data are available for a geographic region, but these reflect short-run aberrations due to exogenous shocks (such as would be the case of beef sales in a prefecture or city stricken with foot and mouth disease), these observations were dropped or "filtered" from the analysis.

Step 3. Filling in Missing Values

In some cases, data are available on a sporadic basis. In other cases, data may be available for only one year. From a Bayesian perspective, these observations should be given greatest weight in estimating missing years. Assuming that other factors are held constant, the missing years are extrapolated using changes and growth in aggregate national, prefecture and city-level income. Based on the overriding philosophy of a long-run consumption function (defined earlier), prefectures and cities which have missing data for any given year, are estimated based on historical dynamics of aggregate income for that geographic entity.

Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation

Given the data available from the first three steps, the latent demand is estimated using a “varying-parameter cross-sectionally pooled time series model”. Simply stated, the effect of income on latent demand is assumed to be constant unless there is empirical evidence to suggest that this effect varies (i.e., . the slope of the income effect is not necessarily same for all prefectures or cities). This assumption applies along the aggregate consumption function, but also over time (i.e., not all prefectures or cities in Japan are perceived to have the same income growth prospects over time). Another way of looking at this is to say that latent demand for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts is more likely to be similar across prefectures or cities that have similar characteristics in terms of economic development.

This approach is useful across geographic regions for which some notion of non-linearity exists in the aggregate cross-region consumption function. For some categories, however, the reader must realize that the numbers will reflect a prefecture’s or city’s contribution to latent demand in Japan and may never be realized in the form of local sales.

Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation

Nonlinearities are assumed in cases where filtered data exist along the aggregate consumption function. Because Japan consists of more than 1,000 cities, there will always be those cities, especially toward the bottom of the consumption function, where non-linear estimation is simply not possible. For these cities, equilibrium latent demand is assumed to be perfectly parametric and not a function of wealth (i.e., a city’s stock of income), but a function of current income (a city’s flow of income). In the long run, if a prefecture has no current income, the latent demand for electric and microwave household cooking units and parts is assumed to approach zero. The assumption is that wealth stocks fall rapidly to zero if flow income falls to zero (i.e., cities which earn low levels of income will not use their savings, in the long run, to demand electric and microwave household cooking units and parts). In a graphical sense, for low income cities, latent demand approaches zero in a parametric linear fashion with a zero-zero intercept. In this stage of the estimation procedure, a low-income city is assumed to have a latent demand proportional to its income, based on the cities closest to it on the aggregate consumption function.

Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking

Based on the models described above, latent demand figures are estimated for all major cities in Japan. These are then aggregated to get prefecture totals. This report considers a city as a part of the regional and national market. The purpose is to understand the density of demand within a prefecture and the extent to which a city might be used as a point of distribution within its prefecture. From an economic perspective, however, a city does not represent a population within rigid geographical boundaries. To an economist or strategic planner, a city represents an area of dominant influence over markets in adjacent areas. This influence varies from one industry to another, but also from one period of time to another. we allocate latent demand across areas of dominant influence based on the relative economic importance of cities within its prefecture. Not all cities (e.g. the smaller towns) are estimated within each prefecture as demand may be allocated to adjacent areas of influence. Since some cities have higher economic wealth than others within the same prefecture, a city’s population is not generally used to allocate latent demand. Rather, the level of economic activity of the city vis-à-vis others
 
Contents:
1 INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 Overview 10 1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 10 1.3 The Methodology 11 1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 12 1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 14 1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 14 1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 15 1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 15 1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 15 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 17 2.1 The Latent Demand in Japan 17 2.2 Top 100 Cities Sorted by Rank 19 3 AICHI 22 3.1 Latent Demand by Year - Aichi 22 3.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Aichi 23 3.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Aichi 25 4 AKITA 27 4.1 Latent Demand by Year - Akita 27 4.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Akita 28 4.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Akita 29 5 AOMORI 30 5.1 Latent Demand by Year - Aomori 30 5.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Aomori 31 5.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Aomori 32 6 CHIBA 33 6.1 Latent Demand by Year - Chiba 33 6.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Chiba 34 6.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Chiba 35 7 EHIME 37 7.1 Latent Demand by Year - Ehime 37 7.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ehime 38 7.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Ehime 39 8 FUKUI 40 8.1 Latent Demand by Year - Fukui 40 8.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Fukui 41 8.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Fukui 42 9 FUKUOKA 43 9.1 Latent Demand by Year - Fukuoka 43 9.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Fukuoka 44 9.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Fukuoka 45 10 FUKUSHIMA 47 10.1 Latent Demand by Year - Fukushima 47 10.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Fukushima 48 10.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Fukushima 49 11 GIFU 50 11.1 Latent Demand by Year - Gifu 50 11.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Gifu 51 11.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Gifu 52 12 GUMMA 53 12.1 Latent Demand by Year - Gumma 53 12.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Gumma 54 12.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Gumma 55 13 HIROSHIMA 56 13.1 Latent Demand by Year - Hiroshima 56 13.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hiroshima 57 13.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Hiroshima 58 14 HOKKAIDO 59 14.1 Latent Demand by Year - Hokkaido 59 14.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hokkaido 60 14.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Hokkaido 61 15 HYOGO 63 15.1 Latent Demand by Year - Hyogo 63 15.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Hyogo 64 15.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Hyogo 65 16 IBARAKI 67 16.1 Latent Demand by Year - Ibaraki 67 16.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ibaraki 68 16.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Ibaraki 69 17 ISHIKAWA 71 17.1 Latent Demand by Year - Ishikawa 71 17.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Ishikawa 72 17.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Ishikawa 73 18 IWATE 74 18.1 Latent Demand by Year - Iwate 74 18.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Iwate 75 18.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Iwate 76 19 KAGAWA 77 19.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kagawa 77 19.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kagawa 78 19.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kagawa 79 20 KAGOSHIMA 80 20.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kagoshima 80 20.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kagoshima 81 20.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kagoshima 82 21 KANAGAWA 83 21.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kanagawa 83 21.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kanagawa 84 21.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kanagawa 85 22 KOCHI 86 22.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kochi 86 22.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kochi 87 22.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kochi 87 23 KUMAMOTO 88 23.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kumamoto 88 23.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kumamoto 89 23.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kumamoto 90 24 KYOTO 91 24.1 Latent Demand by Year - Kyoto 91 24.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Kyoto 92 24.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Kyoto 93 25 MIE 94 25.1 Latent Demand by Year - Mie 94 25.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Mie 95 25.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Mie 96 26 MIYAGI 97 26.1 Latent Demand by Year - Miyagi 97 26.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Miyagi 98 26.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Miyagi 99 27 MIYAZAKI 100 27.1 Latent Demand by Year - Miyazaki 100 27.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Miyazaki 101 27.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Miyazaki 102 28 NAGANO 103 28.1 Latent Demand by Year - Nagano 103 28.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nagano 104 28.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Nagano 105 29 NAGASAKI 106 29.1 Latent Demand by Year - Nagasaki 106 29.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nagasaki 107 29.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Nagasaki 108 30 NARA 109 30.1 Latent Demand by Year - Nara 109 30.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Nara 110 30.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Nara 111 31 NIIGATA 112 31.1 Latent Demand by Year - Niigata 112 31.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Niigata 113 31.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Niigata 114 32 OITA 115 32.1 Latent Demand by Year - Oita 115 32.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Oita 116 32.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Oita 117 33 OKAYAMA 118 33.1 Latent Demand by Year - Okayama 118 33.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Okayama 119 33.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Okayama 120 34 OKINAWA 121 34.1 Latent Demand by Year - Okinawa 121 34.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Okinawa 122 34.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Okinawa 123 35 OSAKA 124 35.1 Latent Demand by Year - Osaka 124 35.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Osaka 125 35.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Osaka 126 36 SAGA 128 36.1 Latent Demand by Year - Saga 128 36.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Saga 129 36.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Saga 130 37 SAITAMA 131 37.1 Latent Demand by Year - Saitama 131 37.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Saitama 132 37.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Saitama 134 38 SHIGA 136 38.1 Latent Demand by Year - Shiga 136 38.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Shiga 137 38.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Shiga 138 39 SHIMANE 139 39.1 Latent Demand by Year - Shimane 139 39.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Shimane 140 39.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Shimane 140 40 SHIZUOKA 142 40.1 Latent Demand by Year - Shizuoka 142 40.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Shizuoka 143 40.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Shizuoka 144 41 TOCHIGI 146 41.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tochigi 146 41.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tochigi 147 41.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tochigi 148 42 TOKUSHIMA 149 42.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tokushima 149 42.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tokushima 150 42.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tokushima 151 43 TOKYO 152 43.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tokyo 152 43.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tokyo 153 43.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tokyo 154 44 TOTTORI 155 44.1 Latent Demand by Year - Tottori 155 44.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Tottori 156 44.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Tottori 156 45 TOYAMA 157 45.1 Latent Demand by Year - Toyama 157 45.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Toyama 158 45.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Toyama 159 46 WAKAYAMA 160 46.1 Latent Demand by Year - Wakayama 160 46.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Wakayama 161 46.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Wakayama 162 47 YAMAGATA 163 47.1 Latent Demand by Year - Yamagata 163 47.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Yamagata 164 47.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Yamagata 165 48 YAMAGUCHI 166 48.1 Latent Demand by Year - Yamaguchi 166 48.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Yamaguchi 167 48.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Yamaguchi 168 49 YAMANASHI 169 49.1 Latent Demand by Year - Yamanashi 169 49.2 Cities Sorted by Rank - Yamanashi 170 49.3 Cities Sorted Alphabetically - Yamanashi 171 50 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 172 50.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 172 50.2 User Agreement Provisions 173
 
Ordering:
Order Online - visit http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/488063

Order by Fax - using the order form below

Order By Post - print the order form below and send to

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.

 
Page 1 of 2
Printed Nov 27, 2014
11:18:54 PM

Fax order form

To place a fax order simply print this form, fill in and fax the completed form to the number below. If you have any questions please email help@researchandmarkets.net

Order information

Please verify that the product information is correct and select the format you require.

Product name

The 2007-2012 Outlook for Electric and Microwave Household Cooking Units and Parts in Japan

Web Address

http://www.researchandmarkets.com/reports/488063

Office Code

SCOI7T

 

Report Formats

Please enter the quantity of the report format you require.

Format Quantity Price
Electronic - Single User USD 495

Contact information

Please enter all the information below in block capitals.

Title:
Mr Mrs Dr Miss Ms Prof
First Name:
Last Name:
Email Address:
Job Title:
Organisation:
Address:
City:
Postal / Zip Code:
Country:
Phone Number:
Fax Number:

Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)

Page 2 of 2
Printed Nov 27, 2014
11:18:54 PM

Payment information

Please indicate the payment method you would like to use by selecting the appropriate box.

Pay by Credit Card:

American Express

Diners Club

Master Card

Visa

Cardholder's Name:
Cardholder's Signature:
Expiry Date:
/
Card Number:
CVV Security Code:
Issue date:
/ (Diners Club only)
 
Pay by Check:

Please post the check, accompanied by this form, to:

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,
Ireland.

 
Pay by Wire Transfer:

Please transfer funds to:

Account Number:
83313083
Sort Code:
98-53-30
Swift Code:
ULSBIE2D
IBAN Number:
IE78ULSB98533083313083
Bank Address:
Ulster Bank,
27-35 Main Street
Blackrock,
Co. Dublin
Ireland.
 

If you have a Marketing Code please enter it below:

Marketing Code:

Please note that by ordering from Research and Markets you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions at http://www.researchandmarkets.com/info/terms.asp

Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)