• 1-800-526-8630U.S. (TOLL FREE)
  • 1-917-300-0470EAST COAST U.S.
  • +353-1-416-8900REST OF WORLD
Academic Library Website Benchmarks Product Image

Academic Library Website Benchmarks

  • ID: 575795
  • January 2007
  • 125 Pages
  • Primary Research Group

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Alfred University
  • East Carolina University
  • Kent State University
  • Marist College
  • Patrick Henry College
  • Shippinsburg University
  • MORE

Academic Library Website Benchmarks is based on data from more than 80 academic libraries in the USA and Canada. The 125+ page study presents detailed data on the composition of the academic library web staff, relations with the college and library information technology departments, use of consultants and freelancers, budgets, future plans, website marketing methods, website revision plans, usage statistics, use of software, development of federated search and online forms and much more. Data is broken out by enrollment size, public and private status, Carnegie Class, as well as for libraries with or without their own web staff.

Some of the report's findings are that:

- More than three quarters of all respondents plan a major redesign of the library website within the next two years. Nearly 85% of research universities (84.6%) planned a website redesign in this period. A high percentage of colleges with FTE enrollments below 2,000 (82%) planned to redesign their website within the next two years, compared to 72.7 to 78.3% of colleges with higher enrollments.

- The library information technology or web staff accounted for over 76% of the total man-hours spent READ MORE >

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • Alfred University
  • East Carolina University
  • Kent State University
  • Marist College
  • Patrick Henry College
  • Shippinsburg University
  • MORE

List of Tables

Survey Participants

Dimensions of the Sample

Summary of Main Findings

Chapter One: College Library Web Staff

Chapter Two: Navigation

Chapter Three: Content-Editing

Chapter Four: Technology

Chapter Five: Website Marketing

Chapter Six: Staffing the Website

Chapter Seven: Re-Design
Chapter Eight: Library Website Budget

Chapter Nine: Web Statistics

Chapter Ten: Online Forms & Script Work

Chapter Eleven: Federated Search Capability

Chapter Twelve: Web Communications and Marketing

Chapter Thirteen: Use of Consultants

Chapter Fourteen: Online Training

List of Tables

Table 1.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff

Table 1.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 1.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 1.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 1.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by the College Administration Web Staff or College Administration Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 1.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff

Table 1.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 1.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 1.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 1.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Library Web Staff or Library Information Technology Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 1.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties

Table 1.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 1.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website by Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 1.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 1.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Total Man Hours Spent Running the Library Website Provided by Consultants, Outsourced Service Providers or Other Third Parties, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 2.1: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed
Table 2.2: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 2.3: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 2.4: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 2.5: Percentage of College Library Websites with an E-Resources Page or Portal from which All College Library’s E-Resources can be Accessed, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 3.1: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems

Table 3.2: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 3.3: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 3.4: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 3.5: Library Website Use of Content Editing Systems, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 3.6: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use

Table 3.7: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 3.8: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 3.9: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 3.10: Attitudes toward Content Management System Currently in Use, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 3.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester

Table 3.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 3.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 3.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 3.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Library Personnel who Entered Content into the College Library Website in the Last Full Semester, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 3.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff

Table 3.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 3.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 3.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 3.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Librarians or Other Library or College Employees who can Enter Content into the Library Website without Official Clearance from the College Library Webmaster or Web Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 4.1: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website 55
Table 4.2: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 4.3: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 4.4: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 4.5: Most Commonly Used Scripting Language for the College Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 4.6: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website

Table 4.7: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 4.8: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 4.9: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 4.10: Use of Cascading Style Sheets on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 4.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format
Table 4.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 4.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 4.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 4.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Library’s Cascading Style Sheets that are in “Embedded Styles” Format, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 4.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages

Table 4.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 4.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 4.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 4.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of Routine Content Updates for the Website Done through Dynamic, Database-Driven Web Pages, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 4.21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website

Table 4.22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 4.23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 4.24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 4.25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Change in the Use of Database-Driven Pages in the Past Two Years, as Expressed as a Percentage of the Total Pages on the Library Website Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.1: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace

Table 5.2: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 5.3: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.4: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 5.5: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site MySpace, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.6: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube

Table 5.7: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 5.8: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 5.9: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 5.10: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Video-Sharing Site YouTube, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 5.11: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life

Table 5.12: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 5.13: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 5.14: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 5.15: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Application Second Life, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 5.16: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook

Table 5.17: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 5.18: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 5.19: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 5.20: Percentage of College Libraries with a Presence on the Social Networking Site Facebook, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 5.21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website

Table 5.22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 5.23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 5.24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 5.25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of RSS Feeds or Electronic Newsletters about the Library and its Services Available for Subscription from the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 5.26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Subscribers to the Electronic Newsletters and RSS Feeds Offered by the Library
Table 5.27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Subscribers to the Electronic Newsletters and RSS Feeds Offered by the Library, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 5.28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Subscribers to the Electronic Newsletters and RSS Feeds Offered by the Library, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 5.29: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources

Table 5.30: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 5.31: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 5.32: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 5.33: Percentage of Library Websites that Include Personal Customization Features Enabling End Users to Construct a “My Library” Identity to Log in and Save Research, Favorite Places, and Other Commonly Used Library Resources, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 5.34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website
Table 5.35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 5.36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 5.37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 5.38: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Staff Time (in hours) Spent Monthly on Search Engine Optimization of the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 6.1: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website

Table 6.2: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 6.3: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 6.4: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 6.5: Respective Roles of the College Administration Information Technology Staff and the College Library Information Technology Staff Regarding IT Work for the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 6.6: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff

Table 6.7: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 6.8: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 6.9: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 6.10: Dimensions of the College Library Web Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 6.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester

Table 6.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 6.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 6.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 6.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of People Outside the Central Library Web Staff that Enter Page Content in a Given Semester, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 6.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration
Table 6.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 6.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 6.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 6.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Individuals Sitting on Committees that Oversee College Website Administration, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 7.1: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year

Table 7.2: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 7.3: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 7.4: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 7.5: Percentage of College Libraries that have Launched a Major Website Redesign within the Past Year, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 7.6: Percentage of College Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years

Table 7.7: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 7.8: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 7.9: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 7.10: Percentage of Libraries Planning a Major Redesign of the Library Website within the Next Two Years, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 8.1: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget

Table 8.2: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 8.3: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 8.4: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 8.5: Line Item Status of Library Website Budget, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 8.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$), Universe of All Libraries in the Sample

Table 8.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 8.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 8.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 8.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of All Libraries in the Sample, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 8.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget

Table 8.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 8.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 8.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 8.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Amount Allotted for the College Library Website in the Library's Annual Central Budget (in US$) Universe of Libraries in the Sample with Line Item for the Website in the Library Budget, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 8.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.)

Table 8.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 8.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 8.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 8.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Past Year (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 8.21: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.)

Table 8.22: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 8.23: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 8.24: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 8.25: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Predicted Percentage Change in Total Spending on the College Library Website within the Next Two Years (Including Spending on Salaries, Technology, Consultants, Content-Development, etc.), Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 9.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website

Table 9.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 9.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 9.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 9.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Files on the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 9.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session

Table 9.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 9.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 9.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 9.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Average Weekly Number of Unique Visitors to the Library Website Between September and May while College is in Session, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel

Table 10.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by Library Information Technology Personnel, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians

Table 10.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by MLS Librarians, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent

Table 10.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by College Administration Information Technology Department or its Equivalent, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.16: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer

Table 10.17: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.18: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.19: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.20: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Percentage of the Total Script Work for the Library Website Done in the Past Year by an Outside Consultant or Freelancer, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.21: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves

Table 10.22: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.23: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.24: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.25: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing Electronic Course Reserves, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.26: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation

Table 10.27: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.28: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.29: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.30: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Use of a Library Workstation, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.31: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service

Table 10.32: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.33: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.34: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.35: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Accessing a Virtual Chat Reference Service, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.36: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made

Table 10.37: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.38: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.39: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.40: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Making an Appointment to Visit a Special Collection for which Appointments must be Made, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.41: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans

Table 10.42: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 10.43: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.44: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 10.45: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Initiating Interlibrary Loans, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.46: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library

Table 10.47: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 10.48: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.49: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.50: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Reserving Special Computer Rooms at the Library, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 10.51: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class

Table 10.52: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Carnegie Class 105
Table 10.53: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 10.54: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 10.55: Percentage of College Library Websites with an Online Form for Arranging for a Librarian to Visit a Class, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 11.1: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once

Table 11.2: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 11.3: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 11.4: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 11.5: Percentage of Libraries Currently Offering Federated Search Capabilities from the Website so that a Broad Range of Library Databases can be Searched at Once, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 11.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website
Table 11.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 11.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 11.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 11.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Years a Federated Search Capability has been Offered from the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 11.11: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities

Table 11.12: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 11.13: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 11.14: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 11.15: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Separate Subject-Specific Search Windows Offered on the Websites which Offer Federated Search Capabilities, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 11.16: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use

Table 11.17: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 11.18: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 11.19: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 11.20: Impact of Federated Search Implementation on Database Use, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 12.1: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News

Table 12.2: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 12.3: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 12.4: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 12.5: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Blogs for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement
Table 12.6: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News

Table 12.7: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 12.8: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 12.9: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 12.10: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Listservs for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 12.11: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News

Table 12.12: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 12.13: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 12.14: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.15: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More RSS Feeds for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 12.16: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News

Table 12.17: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 12.18: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 12.19: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 12.20: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Podcasts for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 12.21: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News

Table 12.22: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 12.23: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 12.24: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 12.25: Percentage of College Library Websites with One or More Email Newsletters for Library News, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 12.26: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff
Table 12.27: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 12.28: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 12.29: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 12.30: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Listservs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 12.31: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff
Table 12.32: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 12.33: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 12.34: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 12.35: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Blogs Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 12.36: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff

Table 12.37: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communications by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 12.38: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 12.39: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 12.40: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of e-Newsletters Used for Internal Communication by Librarians and other Library Staff, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 13.1: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website
Table 13.2: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 13.3: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 13.4: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 13.5: Percentage of College Libraries that have Hired a Consultant or Consulting Firm to Advise on Developing or Altering the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 13.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website

Table 13.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 13.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 13.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 13.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Spending (In $) by the Library or College on Consultants or Consulting Firms to Advise on the College Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 13.11: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website

Table 13.12: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class
Table 13.13: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College
Table 13.14: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 13.15: Percentage of Libraries that have Conducted a Formal Usability Test of the College Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 13.16: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?

Table 13.17: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 13.18: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 13.19: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 13.20: Who Performs the Formal Usability Test of the College Website?, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 14.1: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website

Table 14.2: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 14.3: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 14.4: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment
Table 14.5: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of Interactive Tutorials on How to Use the Library or its Services (Not Only Subject or Database Guides) Offered through the Library Website, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Table 14.6: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year
Table 14.7: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Carnegie Class

Table 14.8: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Public or Private Status of College

Table 14.9: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Size of FTE Enrollment

Table 14.10: Mean, Median, Minimum and Maximum Number of End Users that have Visited or Used These Interactive Tutorials in the Past Year, Broken Out by Webmaster Staffing Arrangement

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown

Survey Participants:

- Abilene Christian University Brown Library
- Alfred University
- Angelo State University
- Baton Rouge Community College
- Benedictine University
- Bergen Community College Library
- Binghamton University
- Buffalo State College, E. H. Butler Library
- California State University, Long Beach Library
- California State University-Sacramento
- Capella University
- Chapman University
- Coastal Carolina University
- College of Saint Elizabeth
- Colorado State University Libraries
- Community College of Allegheny County
- Dickinson State University, Stoxen Library
- East Carolina University
- Edgewood College
- Elon University
- Fashion Institute of Design & Merchandising
- Florida State University Libraries
- Fort Lewis College
- Freed-Hardeman University
- George Washington University, Virginia Campus Library
- Grinnell College
- Indiana University Bloomington Libraries
- Indiana University Northwest
- Kent State University
- Lane Community College Library
- Lawrence University
- LeTourneau University Library
- Longwood University
- Loyola Marymount University
- Loyola University Chicago
- Luther College
- Lycoming College
- Marist College
- McGill University
- Meredith College
- Michigan State University Libraries
- Misericordia University
- Mt. Wachusett Community College
- New York University, Ehrman Medical Library
- Northeastern State University Library
- Northwest Vista College
- Ocean County College Library
- Olivet Nazarene University
- Olney Central College
- Our Lady of the Lake University
- Patrick Henry College
- Pfeiffer University
- Polytechnic University
- Providence College
- Randolph-Macon College
- Reed College Library
- Reed Library, Fort Lewis College
- San Diego State University Library
- Shippinsburg University
- South Texas College
- Southern Illinois University-Carbondale
- St. Bonaventure University
- Texas Woman's University
- Thomas Jefferson University
- Thompson Rivers University Library
- University of Central Missouri
- University of Connecticut Libraries
- University of Hawaii-Manoa, Hamilton Library
- University of Michigan
- University of New Brunswick Libraries
- University of New Mexico Valencia Campus Library
- University of North Florida
- University of Tennessee-Chattanooga
- University of Wisconsin-Whitewater
- Walden University
- Wartburg College, Vogel Library
- Wayne State College
- West Virginia University Libraries
- Western Oregon University
- Wingate University
- Yale University Library
- Yavapai College

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown
Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown

RELATED PRODUCTS

Our Clients

Our clients' logos