WORLD'S LARGEST MARKET RESEARCH RESOURCE — 1,519,265 REPORTS

 
 
• SEARCH FOR A REPORT

Viewing report

Search
Enter keywords, a title or a report id number below.
Advanced

• ORDER BY FAX

Order By Fax

• SELECT SITE CURRENCY

Select a currency for use throughout the site



  • Electronic (PDF) Information Icon
  • Hard Copy Information Icon
  • Enterprisewide Information Icon
Live Chat Live Help Software for Website

Market Competitive Intensity (MCI):South Australia

Datamonitor, April 2008, Pages: 28

The MCI Index offers a robust framework for measuring the development of utility Market Competitive Intensity. The MCI assessment draws on nine underlying metrics grouped into three broad clusters: Market framework; Supplier Push; Customer Pull.

Scope

- Insight into the current levels of competitiveness in the gas and power markets of 20 key Asia Pacific countries.

- Benchmarking of the factors driving competition and market entry in the gas and power sectors of the selected markets.

- Analysis of how the selected markets are likely to evolve given the currently prevailing market dynamics.

Highlights of this title

MCI scores are calculated using two different methods. The first, the simple weighted average (additive) measure shows overall competitive intensity. The second, the multiplicative method, is more complex. It prevents markets with an overly wide spread of underlying raw scores from exerting undue influence over, or skewing, the final result.

Liberalisation, energy pricing issues and environmental concerns will remain key drivers of gas and power market dynamics throughout the MCI forecast period.

Key reasons to purchase this title

- Assess the competitive environments of gas and power markets both now and in the future.

- Gain insight into value chain factors driving market competitiveness and how each individual part of the chain will evolve as competition develops.

- Screen future market entry plans against the MCI scores to highlight key areas of potential risk and opportunity.

DATAMONITOR VIEW 1
CATALYST 1
SUMMARY 1
ANALYSIS 2
Introduction: Datamonitors MCI Index offers a robust framework for measuring the development of energy Market Competitive Intensity 2
The MCI Index shows how attractive a particular market is to new entrants in terms of the competitive environment 3
The MCI assessment draws on nine underlying metrics grouped into three broad clusters: market framework; supplier push; customer pull 3
The MCI Index measures the development of 20 diverse Asia Pacific gas and power markets 4
The MCI Index assesses markets in December 2007, and on July 1, 2010, in addition to driving a market switching forecast 4
Each of the nine pillars has an assessment scale to allow for the comparison of diverse markets (see appendix for more details) 5
Two differing overall MCI scores are calculated to ensure full clarity of results 5
A simple weighted average (additive) measure shows overall competitive intensity 5
This is based on the average score of each underlying factor, weighted by the importance of that factor to the overall score. The weights applied to each of the metrics are shown later. The simple additive measure is calculated using the following formula: MCI=Sz1-9. 5
A weighted multiple (multiplicative) measure shows overall competitive intensity 5
The MCI framework has a number of applications for your organization 6
Context: South Australias energy market is one of the most developed energy markets in Australia 7
Although well developed, competitive intensity in South Australia is eclipsed by other markets over the forecast period 7
In common with the power sector, gas market competitive intensity development does not keep pace with other markets in the region 8
Power MCI: By 2010, all of South Australias scores move to the upper end of the range 9
Market Framework scores are particularly strong 9
Effectiveness of regulator [2007: 7.5/10 2010: 9/10] 9
Effectiveness of balancing and data transfer [2007: 9.5/10 2010: 10/10] 10
Concentration in the wholesale and retail markets curtails the Supplier Push metrics 10
Wholesale market fragmentation [2007: 4.5/10 2010: 5.5/10] 10
Retail market fragmentation [2007: 4/10 2010: 4/10] 11
Traded market maturity [2007: 9/10 2010: 10/10] 11
Customer Pull metrics develop well over the forecast period 11
Access to market information and assistance [2007: 6/10 2010: 8/10] 11
Consumer representation [2007: 5/10 2010: 9/10] 11
Propensity to switch [2007: 4.5/10 2010: 6.5/10] 12
Gas MCI: Competitive intensity in the gas sector will remain strong over the forecast period 13
Two of the three Market Framework factors score close to the top end of the scale 13
Effectiveness of regulator [2007: 7.5/10 2010: 9/10] 13
Ease of third party access [2007: 9/10 2010: 10/10] 14
Effectiveness of balancing and data transfer [2007: 3.5/10 2010: 4/10] 14
Supplier Push metrics have room to develop further in the longer term 14
Wholesale market fragmentation [2007: 4.5/10 2010: 4.5/10] 14
Retail market fragmentation [2007: 3/10 2010: 3/10] 14
Customer Pull scores vary widely between individual metrics 14
Access to market information and assistance [2007: 3.5/10 2010: 5/10] 14
Consumer representation [2007: 5/10 2010: 7/10] 15
Propensity to switch [2007: 7/10 2010: 9/10] 15
Outlook: Commercial opportunities in the power sector will continue to outweigh those seen in the gas market 16
MCI Scores 17
APPENDIX 20
Definitions 20
Ask the analyst 28
List of Tables
Table 1: Market Competitive Intensity, South Australia 2007-10 17
Table 2: MCI additive, Asia Pacific 2007-10 18
Table 3: MCI multiplicative, Asia Pacific 2007-10 19
List of Figures
Figure 1: MCI assessment scale 3
Figure 2: MCI assessment framework 3
Figure 3: MCI market coverage 4
Figure 4: MCI scales 5
Figure 5: MCI Applications 6
Figure 6: Asia Pacific power Market Competitive Intensity, 2007-10 7
Figure 7: Asia Pacific gas Market Competitive Intensity, 2007-10 8
Figure 8: Power Market Competitive Intensity Index, South Australia 9
Figure 9: Gas Market Competitive Intensity Index, South Australia 13
Figure 10: Market Competitive Intensity, South Australia 16
Figure 11: Scale for MCI assessment, effectiveness of regulator 20
Figure 12: Scale for MCI assessment, ease of third party access 21
Figure 13: Scale for MCI assessment, effectiveness of balancing and data transfer 21
Figure 14: Scale for MCI assessment, wholesale market fragmentation 22
Figure 15: Scale for MCI assessment, retail market fragmentation 23
Figure 16: Scale for MCI assessment, traded market maturity 24
Figure 17: Scale for MCI assessment, traded market maturity 25
Figure 18: Scale for MCI assessment, access to market information and assistance 26
Figure 19: Scale for MCI assessment, consumer representation 27
Figure 20: Scale for MCI assessment, propensity to switch 28

Customers who bought this item also bought