Research and Markets, the largest resource for market research information in world providing essential market research reports, industry research, industry analysis, forecasts, market studies, company profiles and country reports.
Welcome - Home - Register - Login - Help/FAQ - 0 items View Basket
Worlds Largest Market Research Resource - 392380 Live Reports
Search Research and Markets
  Search
Enter keywords, a title or
a report id number below.





Advanced   
Company search
Register for free email updates of market research
Currency
  Select a currency for use throughout the site



Viewing report

Order by Fax
Printer Friendly
PDF Brochure
Send to Friend
Enquire before Buying
ElectronicAdd to Basket



Defending Humanity: When Force is Justified and Why
Oxford University Press, March 2008, Pages: 288


  Description  
  Table of Contents  
  Reviews  
    
    
   
 Enquire before Buying  
 Send to a Friend  

In Defending Humanity, internationally acclaimed legal scholar George P. Fletcher and Jens David Ohlin, a leading expert on international criminal law, tackle one of the most important and controversial questions of our time: When is war justified? When a nation is attacked, few would deny that it has the right to respond with force. But what about preemptive and preventive wars, or crossing another states border to stop genocide? Was Israel justified in initiating the Six Day War, and was NATOs intervention in Kosovo legal? What about the U.S. invasion of Iraq?

In their provocative new book, Fletcher and Ohlin offer a groundbreaking theory on the legality of war with clear guidelines for evaluating these interventions. The authors argue that much of the confusion on the subject stems from a persistent misunderstanding of the United Nations Charter. The Charter appears to be very clear on the use of military force: it is only allowed when authorized by the Security Council or in self-defense.

Unfortunately, this has led to the problem of justifying force when the Security Council refuses to act or when self-defense is thought not to apply--and to the difficult dilemma of declaring such interventions illegal or ignoring the UN Charter altogether.

Fletcher and Ohlin suggest that the answer lies in going back to the domestic criminal law concepts upon which the UN Charter was originally based, in particular, the concept of 'legitimate defense,' which encompasses not only self-defense but defense of others. Lost in the English-language version of the Charter but a vital part of the French and other non-English versions, the concept of legitimate defense will enable political leaders, courts, and scholars to see the solid basis under international law for states to intervene with force--not just to protect themselves against an imminent attack but also to defend other national groups.




Customers who bought this item also bought

Defending Humanity: When Force is Justified and Why

How International Law Works: A Rational Choice Theory

Great People Decisions: Why They Matter So Much, Why They are So Hard, and How You Can Master Them

Back To Coal: Why Utilities Must Reconsider This Cheap, Plentiful Fuel

IMS - What, When and Why?

Why People Buy Entertainment & Recreation 2003

Hybrid Drives, How, Why, and When?

Flash Packaging: What Phone Makers Want, When & Why?



Top of page


   All rights reserved. � Copyright 2008 Research and Markets
   Terms and conditions Privacy Policy Publishers Employment Opportunities Site Map Link to us Webmaster


Research and Markets RSS Feeds