The 2009-2014 World Outlook for Digital Electronic Color and Black-And-White Scanners, Digitizers, and Recorders, Other Input or Output Devices, and Digital Previewers and Other Prepress Systems, Components, and Elements
ICON Group International, September 2008, Pages: 220
WHAT IS LATENT DEMAND AND THE P.I.E.?
The concept of latent demand is rather subtle. The term latent typically refers to something that is dormant, not observable, or not yet realized. Demand is the notion of an economic quantity that a target population or market requires under different assumptions of price, quality, and distribution, among other factors. Latent demand, therefore, is commonly defined by economists as the industry earnings of a market when that market becomes accessible and attractive to serve by competing firms. It is a measure, therefore, of potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) or total revenues (not profit) if a market is served in an efficient manner. It is typically expressed as the total revenues potentially extracted by firms. The “market” is defined at a given level in the value chain. There can be latent demand at the retail level, at the wholesale level, the manufacturing level, and the raw materials level (the P.I.E. of higher levels of the value chain being always smaller than the P.I.E. of levels at lower levels of the same value chain, assuming all levels maintain minimum profitability).
The latent demand for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements is not actual or historic sales. Nor is latent demand future sales. In fact, latent demand can be lower either lower or higher than actual sales if a market is inefficient (i.e., not representative of relatively competitive levels). Inefficiencies arise from a number of factors, including the lack of international openness, cultural barriers to consumption, regulations, and cartel-like behavior on the part of firms. In general, however, latent demand is typically larger than actual sales in a country market.
For reasons discussed later, this report does not consider the notion of “unit quantities”, only total latent revenues (i.e., a calculation of price times quantity is never made, though one is implied). The units used in this report are U.S. dollars not adjusted for inflation (i.e., the figures incorporate inflationary trends) and not adjusted for future dynamics in exchange rates. If inflation rates or exchange rates vary in a substantial way compared to recent experience, actually sales can also exceed latent demand (when expressed in U.S. dollars, not adjusted for inflation). On the other hand, latent demand can be typically higher than actual sales as there are often distribution inefficiencies that reduce actual sales below the level of latent demand.
As mentioned in the introduction, this study is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. If fact, all the current products or services on the market can cease to exist in their present form (i.e., at a brand-, R&D specification, or corporate-image level) and all the players can be replaced by other firms (i.e., via exits, entries, mergers, bankruptcies, etc.), and there will still be an international latent demand for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements at the aggregate level. Product and service offering details, and the actual identity of the players involved, while important for certain issues, are relatively unimportant for estimates of latent demand.
THE METHODOLOGY
In order to estimate the latent demand for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements on a worldwide basis, I used a multi-stage approach. Before applying the approach, one needs a basic theory from which such estimates are created. In this case, I heavily rely on the use of certain basic economic assumptions. In particular, there is an assumption governing the shape and type of aggregate latent demand functions. Latent demand functions relate the income of a country, city, state, household, or individual to realized consumption. Latent demand (often realized as consumption when an industry is efficient), at any level of the value chain, takes place if an equilibrium is realized. For firms to serve a market, they must perceive a latent demand and be able to serve that demand at a minimal return. The single most important variable determining consumption, assuming latent demand exists, is income (or other financial resources at higher levels of the value chain). Other factors that can pivot or shape demand curves include external or exogenous shocks (i.e., business cycles), and or changes in utility for the product in question.
Ignoring, for the moment, exogenous shocks and variations in utility across countries, the aggregate relation between income and consumption has been a central theme in economics. The figure below concisely summarizes one aspect of problem. In the 1930s, John Meynard Keynes conjectured that as incomes rise, the average propensity to consume would fall. The average propensity to consume is the level of consumption divided by the level of income, or the slope of the line from the origin to the consumption function. He estimated this relationship empirically and found it to be true in the short-run (mostly based on cross-sectional data). The higher the income, the lower the average propensity to consume. This type of consumption function is labeled "A" in the figure below (note the rather flat slope of the curve). In the 1940s, another macroeconomist, Simon Kuznets, estimated long-run consumption functions which indicated that the marginal propensity to consume was rather constant (using time series data across countries). This type of consumption function is show as "B" in the figure below (note the higher slope and zero-zero intercept). The average propensity to consume is constant.
Is it declining or is it constant? A number of other economists, notably Franco Modigliani and Milton Friedman, in the 1950s (and Irving Fisher earlier), explained why the two functions were different using various assumptions on intertemporal budget constraints, savings, and wealth. The shorter the time horizon, the more consumption can depend on wealth (earned in previous years) and business cycles. In the long-run, however, the propensity to consume is more constant. Similarly, in the long run, households, industries or countries with no income eventually have no consumption (wealth is depleted). While the debate surrounding beliefs about how income and consumption are related and interesting, in this study a very particular school of thought is adopted. In particular, we are considering the latent demand for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements across some 230 countries. The smallest have fewer than 10,000 inhabitants. I assume that all of these counties fall along a "long-run" aggregate consumption function. This long-run function applies despite some of these countries having wealth, current income dominates the latent demand for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements. So, latent demand in the long-run has a zero intercept. However, I allow firms to have different propensities to consume (including being on consumption functions with differing slopes, which can account for differences in industrial organization, and end-user preferences).
Given this overriding philosophy, I will now describe the methodology used to create the latent demand estimates for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements. Since ICON Group has asked me to apply this methodology to a large number of categories, the rather academic discussion below is general and can be applied to a wide variety of categories, not just digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements.
Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection
Any study of latent demand across countries requires that some standard be established to define “efficiently served”. Having implemented various alternatives and matched these with market outcomes, I have found that the optimal approach is to assume that certain key countries are more likely to be at or near efficiency than others. These countries are given greater weight than others in the estimation of latent demand compared to other countries for which no known data are available. Of the many alternatives, I have found the assumption that the world’s highest aggregate income and highest income-per-capita markets reflect the best standards for “efficiency”. High aggregate income alone is not sufficient (i.e., China has high aggregate income, but low income per capita and can not assumed to be efficient). Aggregate income can be operationalized in a number of ways, including gross domestic product (for industrial categories), or total disposable income (for household categories; population times average income per capita, or number of households times average household income per capita). Brunei, Nauru, Kuwait, and Lichtenstein are examples of countries with high income per capita, but not assumed to be efficient, given low aggregate level of income (or gross domestic product); these countries have, however, high incomes per capita but may not benefit from the efficiencies derived from economies of scale associated with large economies. Only countries with high income per capita and large aggregate income are assumed efficient. This greatly restricts the pool of countries to those in the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), like the United States, or the United Kingdom (which were earlier than other large OECD economies to liberalize their markets).
The selection of countries is further reduced by the fact that not all countries in the OECD report industry revenues at the category level. Countries that typically have ample data at the aggregate level that meet the efficiency criteria include the United States, the United Kingdom and in some cases France and Germany.
Latent demand is therefore estimated using data collected for relatively efficient markets from independent data sources (e.g. Euromonitor, Mintel, Thomson Financial Services, the U.S. Industrial Outlook, the World Resources Institute, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, various agencies from the United Nations, industry trade associations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank). Depending on original data sources used, the definition of “digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements” is established. In the case of this report, the data were reported at the aggregate level, with no further breakdown or definition. In other words, any potential product or service that might be incorporated within digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements falls under this category. Public sources rarely report data at the disaggregated level in order to protect private information from individual firms that might dominate a specific product-market. These sources will therefore aggregate across components of a category and report only the aggregate to the public. While private data are certainly available, this report only relies on public data at the aggregate level without reliance on the summation of various category components. In other words, this report does not aggregate a number of components to arrive at the “whole”. Rather, it starts with the “whole”, and estimates the whole for all countries and the world at large (without needing to know the specific parts that went into the whole in the first place).
Given this caveat, this study covers “digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements” as defined by the North American Industrial Classification system or NAICS (pronounced “nakes”). For a complete definition of digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements, please refer to the Web site at http://www.icongrouponline.com/codes/NAICS.html. The NAICS code for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements is 3332939101. It is for this definition of digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements that the aggregate latent demand estimates are derived.
Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing
Based on the aggregate view of digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements as defined above, data were then collected for as many similar countries as possible for that same definition, at the same level of the value chain. This generates a convenience sample of countries from which comparable figures are available. If the series in question do not reflect the same accounting period, then adjustments are made. In order to eliminate short-term effects of business cycles, the series are smoothed using an 2 year moving average weighting scheme (longer weighting schemes do not substantially change the results). If data are available for a country, but these reflect short-run aberrations due to exogenous shocks (such as would be the case of beef sales in a country stricken with foot and mouth disease), these observations were dropped or "filtered" from the analysis.
Step 3. Filling in Missing Values
In some cases, data are available for countries on a sporadic basis. In other cases, data from a country may be available for only one year. From a Bayesian perspective, these observations should be given greatest weight in estimating missing years. Assuming that other factors are held constant, the missing years are extrapolated using changes and growth in aggregate national income. Based on the overriding philosophy of a long-run consumption function (defined earlier), countries which have missing data for any given year, are estimated based on historical dynamics of aggregate income for that country.
Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation
Given the data available from the first three steps, the latent demand in additional countries is estimated using a “varying-parameter cross-sectionally pooled time series model”. Simply stated, the effect of income on latent demand is assumed to be constant across countries unless there is empirical evidence to suggest that this effect varies (i.e., . the slope of the income effect is not necessarily same for all countries). This assumption applies across countries along the aggregate consumption function, but also over time (i.e., not all countries are perceived to have the same income growth prospects over time and this effect can vary from country to country as well). Another way of looking at this is to say that latent demand for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements is more likely to be similar across countries that have similar characteristics in terms of economic development (i.e., African countries will have similar latent demand structures controlling for the income variation across the pool of African countries).
This approach is useful across countries for which some notion of non-linearity exists in the aggregate cross-country consumption function. For some categories, however, the reader must realize that the numbers will reflect a country’s contribution to global latent demand and may never be realized in the form of local sales. For certain country-category combinations this will result in what at first glance will be odd results. For example, the latent demand for the category “space vehicles” will exist for “Togo” even though they have no space program. The assumption is that if the economies in these countries did not exist, the world aggregate for these categories would be lower. The share attributed to these countries is based on a proportion of their income (however small) being used to consume the category in question (i.e., perhaps via resellers).
Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation
Nonlinearities are assumed in cases where filtered data exist along the aggregate consumption function. Because the world consists of more than 200 countries, there will always be those countries, especially toward the bottom of the consumption function, where non-linear estimation is simply not possible. For these countries, equilibrium latent demand is assumed to be perfectly parametric and not a function of wealth (i.e., a country’s stock of income), but a function of current income (a country’s flow of income). In the long run, if a country has no current income, the latent demand for digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements is assumed to approach zero. The assumption is that wealth stocks fall rapidly to zero if flow income falls to zero (i.e., countries which earn low levels of income will not use their savings, in the long run, to demand digital electronic color and black-and-white scanners, digitizers, and recorders, other input or output devices, and digital previewers and other prepress systems, components, and elements). In a graphical sense, for low income countries, latent demand approaches zero in a parametric linear fashion with a zero-zero intercept. In this stage of the estimation procedure, low-income countries are assumed to have a latent demand proportional to their income, based on the country closest to it on the aggregate consumption function.
Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking
Based on the models described above, latent demand figures are estimated for all countries of the world, including for the smallest economies. These are then aggregated to get world totals and regional totals. To make the numbers more meaningful, regional and global demand averages are presented. Figures are rounded, so minor inconsistencies may exist across tables.
Step 7. Latent Demand Density: Allocating Across Cities
With the advent of a “borderless world”, cities become a more important criteria in prioritizing markets, as opposed to regions, continents, or countries. This report also covers the world’s top 2000 cities. The purpose is to understand the density of demand within a country and the extent to which a city might be used as a point of distribution within its region. From an economic perspective, however, a city does not represent a population within rigid geographical boundaries. To an economist or strategic planner, a city represents an area of dominant influence over markets in adjacent areas. This influence varies from one industry to another, but also from one period of time to another.
Similar to country-level data, the reader needs to realize that latent demand allocated to a city may or may not represent real sales. For many items, latent demand is clearly observable in sales, as in the case for food or housing items. Consider, again, the category “satellite launch vehicles.” Clearly, there are no launch pads in most cities of the world. However, the core benefit of the vehicles (e.g. telecommunications, etc.) is "consumed" by residents or industries within the worlds cities. Without certain cities, in other words, the world market for satellite launch vehicles would be lower for the world in general. One needs to allocate, therefore, a portion of the worldwide economic demand for launch vehicles to regions, countries and cities. This report takes the broader definition and considers, therefore, a city as a part of the global market. I allocate latent demand across areas of dominant influence based on the relative economic importance of cities within its home country, within its region and across the world total. Not all cities are estimated within each country as demand may be allocated to adjacent areas of influence. Since some cities have higher economic wealth than others within the same country, a city’s population is not generally used to allocate latent demand. Rather, the level of economic activity of the city vis-à-vis others.
1 INTRODUCTION 10
1.1 Overview 10
1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 10
1.3 The Methodology 11
1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 12
1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 13
1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 14
1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 14
1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 15
1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 15
1.3.7 Step 7. Latent Demand Density: Allocating Across Cities 15
2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 16
2.1 The Worldwide Market Potential 16
3 AFRICA 18
3.1 Executive Summary 18
3.2 Algeria 20
3.3 Angola 21
3.4 Benin 22
3.5 Botswana 23
3.6 Burkina Faso 24
3.7 Burundi 25
3.8 Cameroon 26
3.9 Cape Verde 27
3.10 Central African Republic 28
3.11 Chad 29
3.12 Comoros 30
3.13 Congo (formerly Zaire) 30
3.14 Cote dIvoire 31
3.15 Djibouti 32
3.16 Egypt 33
3.17 Equatorial Guinea 34
3.18 Ethiopia 34
3.19 Gabon 35
3.20 Ghana 36
3.21 Guinea 37
3.22 Guinea-Bissau 38
3.23 Kenya 39
3.24 Lesotho 40
3.25 Liberia 40
3.26 Libya 41
3.27 Madagascar 42
3.28 Malawi 43
3.29 Mali 44
3.30 Mauritania 45
3.31 Mauritius 46
3.32 Morocco 47
3.33 Mozambique 48
3.34 Namibia 49
3.35 Niger 50
3.36 Nigeria 51
3.37 Republic of Congo 52
3.38 Reunion 53
3.39 Rwanda 54
3.40 Sao Tome E Principe 55
3.41 Senegal 55
3.42 Sierra Leone 56
3.43 Somalia 57
3.44 South Africa 58
3.45 Sudan 59
3.46 Swaziland 60
3.47 Tanzania 61
3.48 The Gambia 62
3.49 Togo 63
3.50 Tunisia 64
3.51 Uganda 65
3.52 Western Sahara 66
3.53 Zambia 66
3.54 Zimbabwe 67
4 ASIA & OCEANA 69
4.1 Executive Summary 69
4.2 American Samoa 71
4.3 Australia 72
4.4 Bangladesh 73
4.5 Bhutan 74
4.6 Brunei 75
4.7 Burma 75
4.8 Cambodia 76
4.9 China 77
4.10 Christmas Island 78
4.11 Cook Islands 78
4.12 Fiji 79
4.13 French Polynesia 80
4.14 Guam 81
4.15 Hong Kong 82
4.16 India 82
4.17 Indonesia 83
4.18 Japan 84
4.19 Kiribati 85
4.20 Laos 86
4.21 Macau 87
4.22 Malaysia 87
4.23 Maldives 88
4.24 Marshall Islands 89
4.25 Micronesia Federation 90
4.26 Mongolia 90
4.27 Nauru 91
4.28 Nepal 92
4.29 New Caledonia 93
4.30 New Zealand 94
4.31 Niue 95
4.32 Norfolk Island 95
4.33 North Korea 96
4.34 Palau 97
4.35 Papua New Guinea 97
4.36 Philippines 98
4.37 Seychelles 99
4.38 Singapore 100
4.39 Solomon Islands 101
4.40 South Korea 101
4.41 Sri Lanka 102
4.42 Taiwan 103
4.43 Thailand 104
4.44 The Northern Mariana Island 105
4.45 Tokelau 106
4.46 Tonga 106
4.47 Tuvalu 107
4.48 Vanuatu 108
4.49 Vietnam 108
4.50 Wallis and Futuna 109
4.51 Western Samoa 110
5 EUROPE 111
5.1 Executive Summary 111
5.2 Albania 113
5.3 Andorra 114
5.4 Austria 114
5.5 Belarus 115
5.6 Belgium 116
5.7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 117
5.8 Bulgaria 118
5.9 Croatia 119
5.10 Cyprus 120
5.11 Czech Republic 121
5.12 Denmark 122
5.13 Estonia 123
5.14 Finland 124
5.15 France 125
5.16 Georgia 126
5.17 Germany 127
5.18 Greece 128
5.19 Hungary 129
5.20 Iceland 130
5.21 Ireland 131
5.22 Italy 132
5.23 Kazakhstan 133
5.24 Latvia 134
5.25 Liechtenstein 135
5.26 Lithuania 136
5.27 Luxembourg 137
5.28 Malta 138
5.29 Moldova 139
5.30 Monaco 139
5.31 Norway 140
5.32 Poland 141
5.33 Portugal 142
5.34 Romania 143
5.35 Russia 144
5.36 San Marino 145
5.37 Slovakia 145
5.38 Slovenia 146
5.39 Spain 147
5.40 Sweden 148
5.41 Switzerland 149
5.42 The Netherlands 150
5.43 The United Kingdom 151
5.44 Ukraine 152
6 LATIN AMERICA 153
6.1 Executive Summary 153
6.2 Argentina 154
6.3 Belize 155
6.4 Bolivia 156
6.5 Brazil 157
6.6 Chile 158
6.7 Colombia 159
6.8 Costa Rica 160
6.9 Ecuador 161
6.10 El Salvador 162
6.11 French Guiana 163
6.12 Guatemala 164
6.13 Guyana 165
6.14 Honduras 166
6.15 Mexico 167
6.16 Nicaragua 168
6.17 Panama 169
6.18 Paraguay 170
6.19 Peru 171
6.20 Suriname 172
6.21 The Falkland Islands 173
6.22 Uruguay 173
6.23 Venezuela 174
7 NORTH AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 176
7.1 Executive Summary 176
7.2 Antigua and Barbuda 178
7.3 Aruba 178
7.4 Barbados 179
7.5 Bermuda 180
7.6 Canada 180
7.7 Cuba 181
7.8 Dominica 182
7.9 Dominican Republic 183
7.10 Greenland 184
7.11 Grenada 185
7.12 Guadeloupe 185
7.13 Haiti 186
7.14 Jamaica 187
7.15 Martinique 188
7.16 Puerto Rico 189
7.17 St. Kitts and Nevis 190
7.18 St. Lucia 190
7.19 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 191
7.20 The Bahamas 192
7.21 The British Virgin Islands 192
7.22 The Cayman Islands 193
7.23 The Netherlands Antilles 194
7.24 The U.S. Virgin Islands 194
7.25 The United States 195
7.26 Trinidad and Tobago 196
8 THE MIDDLE EAST 198
8.1 Executive Summary 198
8.2 Afghanistan 199
8.3 Armenia 200
8.4 Azerbaijan 201
8.5 Bahrain 202
8.6 Iran 203
8.7 Iraq 204
8.8 Israel 205
8.9 Jordan 206
8.10 Kuwait 207
8.11 Kyrgyzstan 207
8.12 Lebanon 208
8.13 Oman 209
8.14 Pakistan 209
8.15 Palestine 210
8.16 Qatar 211
8.17 Saudi Arabia 211
8.18 Syrian Arab Republic 212
8.19 Tajikistan 213
8.20 The United Arab Emirates 214
8.21 Turkey 215
8.22 Turkmenistan 216
8.23 Uzbekistan 216
8.24 Yemen 217
9 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 219
9.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 219
9.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 220
Customers who bought this item also bought
All rights reserved. © Copyright 2013 Research and Markets WWW5
Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Publishers Employment Opportunities Site Map Link to us Webmaster Affiliate Network
