Printer Friendly

Printed from

The 2009-2014 World Outlook for Parts, Attachments, and Accessories for Scales and Balances

WHAT IS LATENT DEMAND AND THE P.I.E.? The concept of latent demand is rather subtle. The term latent typically refers to something that is dormant, not observable, or not yet realized. Demand is the notion of an economic quantity that a target population or market requires under different assumptions of price, quality, and distribution, among other factors. Latent demand, therefore, is commonly defined by economists as the industry earnings of a market when that market becomes accessible and attractive to serve by competing firms. It is a measure, therefore, of potential industry earnings (P.I.E.) or total revenues (not profit) if a market is served in an efficient manner. It is typically expressed as the total revenues potentially extracted by firms. The “market” is defined at a given level in the value chain. There can be latent demand at the retail level, at the wholesale level, the manufacturing level, and the raw materials level (the P.I.E. of higher levels of the value chain being always smaller than the P.I.E. of levels at lower levels of the same value chain, assuming all levels maintain minimum profitability). The latent demand for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances is not actual or historic sales. Nor is latent demand future sales. In fact, latent demand can be lower either lower or higher than actual sales if a market is inefficient (i.e., not representative of relatively competitive levels). Inefficiencies arise from a number of factors, including the lack of international openness, cultural barriers to consumption, regulations, and cartel-like behavior on the part of firms. In general, however, latent demand is typically larger than actual sales in a country market. For reasons discussed later, this report does not consider the notion of “unit quantities”, only total latent revenues (i.e., a calculation of price times quantity is never made, though one is implied). The units used in this report are U.S. dollars not adjusted for inflation (i.e., the figures incorporate inflationary trends) and not adjusted for future dynamics in exchange rates. If inflation rates or exchange rates vary in a substantial way compared to recent experience, actually sales can also exceed latent demand (when expressed in U.S. dollars, not adjusted for inflation). On the other hand, latent demand can be typically higher than actual sales as there are often distribution inefficiencies that reduce actual sales below the level of latent demand. As mentioned in the introduction, this study is strategic in nature, taking an aggregate and long-run view, irrespective of the players or products involved. If fact, all the current products or services on the market can cease to exist in their present form (i.e., at a brand-, R&D specification, or corporate-image level) and all the players can be replaced by other firms (i.e., via exits, entries, mergers, bankruptcies, etc.), and there will still be an international latent demand for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances at the aggregate level. Product and service offering details, and the actual identity of the players involved, while important for certain issues, are relatively unimportant for estimates of latent demand. THE METHODOLOGY In order to estimate the latent demand for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances on a worldwide basis, I used a multi-stage approach. Before applying the approach, one needs a basic theory from which such estimates are created. In this case, I heavily rely on the use of certain basic economic assumptions. In particular, there is an assumption governing the shape and type of aggregate latent demand functions. Latent demand functions relate the income of a country, city, state, household, or individual to realized consumption. Latent demand (often realized as consumption when an industry is efficient), at any level of the value chain, takes place if an equilibrium is realized. For firms to serve a market, they must perceive a latent demand and be able to serve that demand at a minimal return. The single most important variable determining consumption, assuming latent demand exists, is income (or other financial resources at higher levels of the value chain). Other factors that can pivot or shape demand curves include external or exogenous shocks (i.e., business cycles), and or changes in utility for the product in question. Ignoring, for the moment, exogenous shocks and variations in utility across countries, the aggregate relation between income and consumption has been a central theme in economics. The figure below concisely summarizes one aspect of problem. In the 1930s, John Meynard Keynes conjectured that as incomes rise, the average propensity to consume would fall. The average propensity to consume is the level of consumption divided by the level of income, or the slope of the line from the origin to the consumption function. He estimated this relationship empirically and found it to be true in the short-run (mostly based on cross-sectional data). The higher the income, the lower the average propensity to consume. This type of consumption function is labeled "A" in the figure below (note the rather flat slope of the curve). In the 1940s, another macroeconomist, Simon Kuznets, estimated long-run consumption functions which indicated that the marginal propensity to consume was rather constant (using time series data across countries). This type of consumption function is show as "B" in the figure below (note the higher slope and zero-zero intercept). The average propensity to consume is constant. Is it declining or is it constant? A number of other economists, notably Franco Modigliani and Milton Friedman, in the 1950s (and Irving Fisher earlier), explained why the two functions were different using various assumptions on intertemporal budget constraints, savings, and wealth. The shorter the time horizon, the more consumption can depend on wealth (earned in previous years) and business cycles. In the long-run, however, the propensity to consume is more constant. Similarly, in the long run, households, industries or countries with no income eventually have no consumption (wealth is depleted). While the debate surrounding beliefs about how income and consumption are related and interesting, in this study a very particular school of thought is adopted. In particular, we are considering the latent demand for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances across some 230 countries. The smallest have fewer than 10,000 inhabitants. I assume that all of these counties fall along a "long-run" aggregate consumption function. This long-run function applies despite some of these countries having wealth, current income dominates the latent demand for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances. So, latent demand in the long-run has a zero intercept. However, I allow firms to have different propensities to consume (including being on consumption functions with differing slopes, which can account for differences in industrial organization, and end-user preferences). Given this overriding philosophy, I will now describe the methodology used to create the latent demand estimates for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances. Since ICON Group has asked me to apply this methodology to a large number of categories, the rather academic discussion below is general and can be applied to a wide variety of categories, not just parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances. Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection Any study of latent demand across countries requires that some standard be established to define “efficiently served”. Having implemented various alternatives and matched these with market outcomes, I have found that the optimal approach is to assume that certain key countries are more likely to be at or near efficiency than others. These countries are given greater weight than others in the estimation of latent demand compared to other countries for which no known data are available. Of the many alternatives, I have found the assumption that the world’s highest aggregate income and highest income-per-capita markets reflect the best standards for “efficiency”. High aggregate income alone is not sufficient (i.e., China has high aggregate income, but low income per capita and can not assumed to be efficient). Aggregate income can be operationalized in a number of ways, including gross domestic product (for industrial categories), or total disposable income (for household categories; population times average income per capita, or number of households times average household income per capita). Brunei, Nauru, Kuwait, and Lichtenstein are examples of countries with high income per capita, but not assumed to be efficient, given low aggregate level of income (or gross domestic product); these countries have, however, high incomes per capita but may not benefit from the efficiencies derived from economies of scale associated with large economies. Only countries with high income per capita and large aggregate income are assumed efficient. This greatly restricts the pool of countries to those in the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), like the United States, or the United Kingdom (which were earlier than other large OECD economies to liberalize their markets). The selection of countries is further reduced by the fact that not all countries in the OECD report industry revenues at the category level. Countries that typically have ample data at the aggregate level that meet the efficiency criteria include the United States, the United Kingdom and in some cases France and Germany. Latent demand is therefore estimated using data collected for relatively efficient markets from independent data sources (e.g. Euromonitor, Mintel, Thomson Financial Services, the U.S. Industrial Outlook, the World Resources Institute, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, various agencies from the United Nations, industry trade associations, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank). Depending on original data sources used, the definition of “parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances” is established. In the case of this report, the data were reported at the aggregate level, with no further breakdown or definition. In other words, any potential product or service that might be incorporated within parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances falls under this category. Public sources rarely report data at the disaggregated level in order to protect private information from individual firms that might dominate a specific product-market. These sources will therefore aggregate across components of a category and report only the aggregate to the public. While private data are certainly available, this report only relies on public data at the aggregate level without reliance on the summation of various category components. In other words, this report does not aggregate a number of components to arrive at the “whole”. Rather, it starts with the “whole”, and estimates the whole for all countries and the world at large (without needing to know the specific parts that went into the whole in the first place). Given this caveat, this study covers “parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances” as defined by the North American Industrial Classification system or NAICS (pronounced “nakes”). For a complete definition of parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances, please refer to the Web site at The NAICS code for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances is 3339973. It is for this definition of parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances that the aggregate latent demand estimates are derived. “Parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances” is specifically defined as follows: 3339973 Parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances  33399731 Retail, commercial, household, and mailing scales  3339973101 Retail and commercial scales, including delicatessen, checkstand, and automatic prepack  3339973103 Other scales, including checkstand and automatic prepack  3339973105 Household and person_weighing scales (including bathroom, coin_operated, free weighing, kitchen, and baby scales)  3339973107 Mailing and parcel post scales (including handheld scales)  3339973109 Balances with or without weights (of all sensitivities), except laboratory   Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing Based on the aggregate view of parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances as defined above, data were then collected for as many similar countries as possible for that same definition, at the same level of the value chain. This generates a convenience sample of countries from which comparable figures are available. If the series in question do not reflect the same accounting period, then adjustments are made. In order to eliminate short-term effects of business cycles, the series are smoothed using an 2 year moving average weighting scheme (longer weighting schemes do not substantially change the results). If data are available for a country, but these reflect short-run aberrations due to exogenous shocks (such as would be the case of beef sales in a country stricken with foot and mouth disease), these observations were dropped or "filtered" from the analysis. Step 3. Filling in Missing Values In some cases, data are available for countries on a sporadic basis. In other cases, data from a country may be available for only one year. From a Bayesian perspective, these observations should be given greatest weight in estimating missing years. Assuming that other factors are held constant, the missing years are extrapolated using changes and growth in aggregate national income. Based on the overriding philosophy of a long-run consumption function (defined earlier), countries which have missing data for any given year, are estimated based on historical dynamics of aggregate income for that country. Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation Given the data available from the first three steps, the latent demand in additional countries is estimated using a “varying-parameter cross-sectionally pooled time series model”. Simply stated, the effect of income on latent demand is assumed to be constant across countries unless there is empirical evidence to suggest that this effect varies (i.e., . the slope of the income effect is not necessarily same for all countries). This assumption applies across countries along the aggregate consumption function, but also over time (i.e., not all countries are perceived to have the same income growth prospects over time and this effect can vary from country to country as well). Another way of looking at this is to say that latent demand for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances is more likely to be similar across countries that have similar characteristics in terms of economic development (i.e., African countries will have similar latent demand structures controlling for the income variation across the pool of African countries). This approach is useful across countries for which some notion of non-linearity exists in the aggregate cross-country consumption function. For some categories, however, the reader must realize that the numbers will reflect a country’s contribution to global latent demand and may never be realized in the form of local sales. For certain country-category combinations this will result in what at first glance will be odd results. For example, the latent demand for the category “space vehicles” will exist for “Togo” even though they have no space program. The assumption is that if the economies in these countries did not exist, the world aggregate for these categories would be lower. The share attributed to these countries is based on a proportion of their income (however small) being used to consume the category in question (i.e., perhaps via resellers). Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation Nonlinearities are assumed in cases where filtered data exist along the aggregate consumption function. Because the world consists of more than 200 countries, there will always be those countries, especially toward the bottom of the consumption function, where non-linear estimation is simply not possible. For these countries, equilibrium latent demand is assumed to be perfectly parametric and not a function of wealth (i.e., a country’s stock of income), but a function of current income (a country’s flow of income). In the long run, if a country has no current income, the latent demand for parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances is assumed to approach zero. The assumption is that wealth stocks fall rapidly to zero if flow income falls to zero (i.e., countries which earn low levels of income will not use their savings, in the long run, to demand parts, attachments, and accessories for scales and balances). In a graphical sense, for low income countries, latent demand approaches zero in a parametric linear fashion with a zero-zero intercept. In this stage of the estimation procedure, low-income countries are assumed to have a latent demand proportional to their income, based on the country closest to it on the aggregate consumption function. Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking Based on the models described above, latent demand figures are estimated for all countries of the world, including for the smallest economies. These are then aggregated to get world totals and regional totals. To make the numbers more meaningful, regional and global demand averages are presented. Figures are rounded, so minor inconsistencies may exist across tables. Step 7. Latent Demand Density: Allocating Across Cities With the advent of a “borderless world”, cities become a more important criteria in prioritizing markets, as opposed to regions, continents, or countries. This report also covers the world’s top 2000 cities. The purpose is to understand the density of demand within a country and the extent to which a city might be used as a point of distribution within its region. From an economic perspective, however, a city does not represent a population within rigid geographical boundaries. To an economist or strategic planner, a city represents an area of dominant influence over markets in adjacent areas. This influence varies from one industry to another, but also from one period of time to another. Similar to country-level data, the reader needs to realize that latent demand allocated to a city may or may not represent real sales. For many items, latent demand is clearly observable in sales, as in the case for food or housing items. Consider, again, the category “satellite launch vehicles.” Clearly, there are no launch pads in most cities of the world. However, the core benefit of the vehicles (e.g. telecommunications, etc.) is "consumed" by residents or industries within the worlds cities. Without certain cities, in other words, the world market for satellite launch vehicles would be lower for the world in general. One needs to allocate, therefore, a portion of the worldwide economic demand for launch vehicles to regions, countries and cities. This report takes the broader definition and considers, therefore, a city as a part of the global market. I allocate latent demand across areas of dominant influence based on the relative economic importance of cities within its home country, within its region and across the world total. Not all cities are estimated within each country as demand may be allocated to adjacent areas of influence. Since some cities have higher economic wealth than others within the same country, a city’s population is not generally used to allocate latent demand. Rather, the level of economic activity of the city vis-à-vis others.
1 INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 Overview 10 1.2 What is Latent Demand and the P.I.E.? 10 1.3 The Methodology 11 1.3.1 Step 1. Product Definition and Data Collection 12 1.3.2 Step 2. Filtering and Smoothing 14 1.3.3 Step 3. Filling in Missing Values 14 1.3.4 Step 4. Varying Parameter, Non-linear Estimation 14 1.3.5 Step 5. Fixed-Parameter Linear Estimation 15 1.3.6 Step 6. Aggregation and Benchmarking 15 1.3.7 Step 7. Latent Demand Density: Allocating Across Cities 15 2 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS 16 2.1 The Worldwide Market Potential 16 3 AFRICA 18 3.1 Executive Summary 18 3.2 Algeria 19 3.3 Angola 20 3.4 Benin 21 3.5 Botswana 21 3.6 Burkina Faso 22 3.7 Burundi 23 3.8 Cameroon 23 3.9 Cape Verde 24 3.10 Central African Republic 25 3.11 Chad 25 3.12 Comoros 26 3.13 Congo (formerly Zaire) 27 3.14 Cote dIvoire 28 3.15 Djibouti 28 3.16 Egypt 29 3.17 Equatorial Guinea 30 3.18 Ethiopia 30 3.19 Gabon 31 3.20 Ghana 32 3.21 Guinea 32 3.22 Guinea-Bissau 33 3.23 Kenya 34 3.24 Lesotho 35 3.25 Liberia 35 3.26 Libya 36 3.27 Madagascar 37 3.28 Malawi 37 3.29 Mali 38 3.30 Mauritania 39 3.31 Mauritius 39 3.32 Morocco 40 3.33 Mozambique 41 3.34 Namibia 41 3.35 Niger 42 3.36 Nigeria 43 3.37 Republic of Congo 44 3.38 Reunion 44 3.39 Rwanda 45 3.40 Sao Tome E Principe 46 3.41 Senegal 46 3.42 Sierra Leone 47 3.43 Somalia 48 3.44 South Africa 48 3.45 Sudan 49 3.46 Swaziland 50 3.47 Tanzania 50 3.48 The Gambia 51 3.49 Togo 52 3.50 Tunisia 52 3.51 Uganda 53 3.52 Western Sahara 54 3.53 Zambia 54 3.54 Zimbabwe 55 4 ASIA & OCEANA 57 4.1 Executive Summary 57 4.2 American Samoa 58 4.3 Australia 59 4.4 Bangladesh 60 4.5 Bhutan 61 4.6 Brunei 61 4.7 Burma 62 4.8 Cambodia 63 4.9 China 63 4.10 Christmas Island 64 4.11 Cook Islands 65 4.12 Fiji 65 4.13 French Polynesia 66 4.14 Guam 67 4.15 Hong Kong 67 4.16 India 68 4.17 Indonesia 69 4.18 Japan 70 4.19 Kiribati 71 4.20 Laos 71 4.21 Macau 72 4.22 Malaysia 73 4.23 Maldives 74 4.24 Marshall Islands 74 4.25 Micronesia Federation 75 4.26 Mongolia 75 4.27 Nauru 76 4.28 Nepal 77 4.29 New Caledonia 77 4.30 New Zealand 78 4.31 Niue 79 4.32 Norfolk Island 80 4.33 North Korea 80 4.34 Palau 81 4.35 Papua New Guinea 82 4.36 Philippines 82 4.37 Seychelles 83 4.38 Singapore 84 4.39 Solomon Islands 84 4.40 South Korea 85 4.41 Sri Lanka 86 4.42 Taiwan 86 4.43 Thailand 87 4.44 The Northern Mariana Island 88 4.45 Tokelau 89 4.46 Tonga 89 4.47 Tuvalu 90 4.48 Vanuatu 90 4.49 Vietnam 91 4.50 Wallis and Futuna 91 4.51 Western Samoa 92 5 EUROPE 93 5.1 Executive Summary 93 5.2 Albania 94 5.3 Andorra 95 5.4 Austria 95 5.5 Belarus 96 5.6 Belgium 97 5.7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 98 5.8 Bulgaria 99 5.9 Croatia 100 5.10 Cyprus 100 5.11 Czech Republic 101 5.12 Denmark 102 5.13 Estonia 103 5.14 Finland 103 5.15 France 104 5.16 Georgia 105 5.17 Germany 106 5.18 Greece 107 5.19 Hungary 107 5.20 Iceland 108 5.21 Ireland 109 5.22 Italy 109 5.23 Kazakhstan 110 5.24 Latvia 111 5.25 Liechtenstein 112 5.26 Lithuania 113 5.27 Luxembourg 113 5.28 Malta 114 5.29 Moldova 115 5.30 Monaco 115 5.31 Norway 116 5.32 Poland 117 5.33 Portugal 118 5.34 Romania 118 5.35 Russia 119 5.36 San Marino 120 5.37 Slovakia 121 5.38 Slovenia 121 5.39 Spain 122 5.40 Sweden 123 5.41 Switzerland 124 5.42 The Netherlands 125 5.43 The United Kingdom 126 5.44 Ukraine 127 6 LATIN AMERICA 129 6.1 Executive Summary 129 6.2 Argentina 130 6.3 Belize 131 6.4 Bolivia 132 6.5 Brazil 132 6.6 Chile 133 6.7 Colombia 134 6.8 Costa Rica 135 6.9 Ecuador 136 6.10 El Salvador 137 6.11 French Guiana 137 6.12 Guatemala 138 6.13 Guyana 139 6.14 Honduras 139 6.15 Mexico 140 6.16 Nicaragua 141 6.17 Panama 142 6.18 Paraguay 143 6.19 Peru 144 6.20 Suriname 145 6.21 The Falkland Islands 145 6.22 Uruguay 146 6.23 Venezuela 147 7 NORTH AMERICA & THE CARIBBEAN 148 7.1 Executive Summary 148 7.2 Antigua and Barbuda 149 7.3 Aruba 150 7.4 Barbados 151 7.5 Bermuda 151 7.6 Canada 152 7.7 Cuba 153 7.8 Dominica 154 7.9 Dominican Republic 154 7.10 Greenland 155 7.11 Grenada 156 7.12 Guadeloupe 157 7.13 Haiti 157 7.14 Jamaica 158 7.15 Martinique 159 7.16 Puerto Rico 159 7.17 St. Kitts and Nevis 160 7.18 St. Lucia 161 7.19 St. Vincent and the Grenadines 161 7.20 The Bahamas 162 7.21 The British Virgin Islands 163 7.22 The Cayman Islands 163 7.23 The Netherlands Antilles 164 7.24 The U.S. Virgin Islands 165 7.25 The United States 165 7.26 Trinidad and Tobago 166 8 THE MIDDLE EAST 167 8.1 Executive Summary 167 8.2 Afghanistan 168 8.3 Armenia 169 8.4 Azerbaijan 170 8.5 Bahrain 170 8.6 Iran 171 8.7 Iraq 172 8.8 Israel 173 8.9 Jordan 173 8.10 Kuwait 174 8.11 Kyrgyzstan 175 8.12 Lebanon 175 8.13 Oman 176 8.14 Pakistan 177 8.15 Palestine 178 8.16 Qatar 178 8.17 Saudi Arabia 179 8.18 Syrian Arab Republic 180 8.19 Tajikistan 181 8.20 The United Arab Emirates 181 8.21 Turkey 182 8.22 Turkmenistan 183 8.23 Uzbekistan 183 8.24 Yemen 184 9 DISCLAIMERS, WARRANTEES, AND USER AGREEMENT PROVISIONS 186 9.1 Disclaimers & Safe Harbor 186 9.2 ICON Group International, Inc. User Agreement Provisions 187
Order Online - visit

Order by Fax - using the order form below

Order By Post - print the order form below and send to

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,

Page 1 of 2
Printed Feb 8, 2016
11:45:36 PM

Fax order form

To place a fax order simply print this form, fill in and fax the completed form to the number below. If you have any questions please email

Order information

Please verify that the product information is correct and select the format you require.

Product name

The 2009-2014 World Outlook for Parts, Attachments, and Accessories for Scales and Balances

Web Address

Office Code


Report Formats

Please enter the quantity of the report format you require.

Format Quantity Price
Electronic (PDF) - Single User USD 795

Contact information

Please enter all the information below in block capitals.

Mr Mrs Dr Miss Ms Prof
First Name:
Last Name:
Job Title:
Post/Zip Code:

Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)

Page 2 of 2
Printed Feb 8, 2016
11:45:36 PM

Payment information

Please indicate the payment method you would like to use by selecting the appropriate box.

Pay by Credit Card:

You will receive an email with a link to a secure page to enter your credit card details.

Pay by Check:

Please post the check, accompanied by this form, to:

Research and Markets,
Guinness Centre,
Taylors Lane,
Dublin 8,

Pay by Wire Transfer:

Please transfer funds to:

Account Number:
Sort Code:
Swift Code:
Bank Address:
Ulster Bank,
27-35 Main Street
Co. Dublin

If you have a Marketing Code please enter it below:

Marketing Code:

Please note that by ordering from Research and Markets you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions at

Please fax this form to:
(646) 607-1907 or (646) 964-6609 (from USA)
+353-1-481-1716 or +353-1-653-1571 (from Rest of World)