|
|
 |
|
Viewing report
|
|
|
|
Understanding the Instant Impact of State of Connecticut v. American Electric Power Co. (2nd Cir. Sept. 21, 2009) on the Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions
ExecSense, Oct 2009, Pages: 61
“Understanding the Instant Impact of State of Connecticut v. American Power Co.” is a time efficient way for environmental lawyers to be in-the-know on the most up to date facts and ramifications of the case and take proactive steps on behalf of current and prospective clients it could impact the most. Take the 60 minutes to view this webinar (on your computer, mobile phone, iPod or printed out) to make sure you have answers ready to key questions you are sure to be asked on the immediate ramifications of the topic by colleagues, clients and other professionals with whom you discuss the case, as the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions will now be handled very differently than in the past.
Upon ordering, we will email you a link to download the webinar for viewing on your computer, mobile media device (iPod/iPhone, Blackberry), or printed out. The downloaded files will include the PowerPoint presentation, audio narration and jpeg images of the slides (for watching on your mobile media device).
The webinar is led by a pair of experts on the ramifications of this case and greenhouse gas emissions, Timothy Jones and John Kinsey, and focuses on:
- Everything you need to know in 60 minutes about the impact of the 2nd Circuit’s ruling in State of Connecticut v. American Power Co.
- Perspective on how the option of states/private parties obtaining case-by-case regulation through the courts will, if at all, affect regulation efforts by the EPA or Congress
- The 10 questions being asked the most by environmental lawyers and their clients with respect to how this will impact them and what proactive steps they should be taking
- Case studies of what other lawyers are doing for their clients based on this ruling and how to explain to clients why these changes need to be implemented immediately
- Case studies of types of companies that will be affected (such as a company with plants in various states) and how greenhouse gas emissions would be regulated by the courts as a result of this decision as opposed to by Congress (the proposed legislation), or the EPA
|
|
|
|
