• +353-1-416-8900(GMT OFFICE HOURS)
  • 1-800-526-8630(US/CAN TOLL FREE)
  • 1-917-300-0470(EST OFFICE HOURS)
Vendor Neutral Archive & Picture Archiving and Communication System Market - Global Forecasts to 2018 - Product Image

Vendor Neutral Archive & Picture Archiving and Communication System Market - Global Forecasts to 2018

  • ID: 2669676
  • October 2013
  • Region: Global
  • 215 Pages
  • Markets and Markets

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • AGFA Healthcare
  • Carestream Health, Inc
  • Fujifilm Corporation
  • Mach 7 Technologies
  • Merge Healthcare
  • Philips Healthcare
  • MORE

'Vendor Neutral Archive Market & PACS Market - VNA [On-premise Software, Hybrid & Cloud, Multi-Department & Multi-Site VNA] & Picture Archiving and Communication System [Enterprise, Cardiology & Radiology] - Global Forecast to 2018'

Vendor neutral archives (VNAs) are information technology platforms that allow single, long-term, centralized, and standard-based storage of medical imaging studies and other patient data from multiple vendor picture archiving and communication systems (PACS). PACS, on the other hand, function as tools that directly connect to different imaging modalities in a facility by acquiring images from them. The global market is estimated to be valued at $165.3 million in 2013 and is expected to reach $335.4 million by 2018, at a healthy CAGR of 15.2%.

The PACS market is broadly categorized into departmental PACS and enterprise PACS. Departmental PACS dominates the revenue market with a market share of around 90.8% in 2013. The departmental PACS market is segmented into radiology, cardiology, and other departmental PACS. Radiology PACS accounts for the largest share - 63% - of the departmental PACS market owing to the increasing READ MORE >

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • AGFA Healthcare
  • Carestream Health, Inc
  • Fujifilm Corporation
  • Mach 7 Technologies
  • Merge Healthcare
  • Philips Healthcare
  • MORE

1 Introduction
1.1 Key Take-Aways
1.2 Report Description
1.3 Markets Covered
1.4 Stakeholders
1.5 Market Scope
1.6 Research Methodology
1.6.1 Market Size Estimation
1.6.2 Market Crackdown & Data Triangulation
1.6.3 Market Share
1.6.4 Key Data Points From Secondary Sources
1.6.5 Key Data Points From Primary Sources
1.6.6 Assumptions

2 Executive Summary

3 Market Overview
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Market Dynamics
3.2.1 Drivers
3.2.1.1 Increasing Demand For Standard-Based Medical Image Archiving And Non-Dicom Content Management Fuels VNA Deployments
3.2.1.2 VNAS Overcome PACS Technological Limitations; Act As A Major Market Propellant
3.2.1.3 Healthcare It-Specific Government Regulations And Guidelines Positively Impact The Adoption Of VNAS
3.2.1.4 Reduction Of Data Migration Costs, A Crucial Benefit Of A VNA, Encourages Investments In The Technology
3.2.1.5 Need For Effective Disaster Recovery And Lifecycle Management Strategies Boosts The Market
3.2.2 Restraints
3.2.2.1 Rising Incidences Of Data Breaches Compromise Privacy And Security Of Imaging Data
3.2.2.2 Longer VNA Lifecycles Impact The Adoption Decisions Of Providers
3.2.2.3 Unclear Definition Of A True VNA Results In Confusion Among Providers
3.2.3 Opportunities
3.2.3.1 Increasing Interest From Emerging Markets Promotes VNA Technology In These Regions
3.2.3.2 Cloud-Based Solutions Represent High-Growth Opportunities
3.2.3.3 Patient-Centric Approach To Deliver Enhanced Care To Open New Avenues For Development Of VNAS
3.2.4 Winning Imperative
3.2.4.1 Best-Of-Breed Solutions Through Partnerships
3.2.5 Burning Issues
3.2.5.1 Evolving Interoperability Standards Present Considerable Challenges
3.2.5.2 Integration Of VNAS With EHRS And ECMS Appears Futuristic

4 Industry Analysis
4.1 Vendor Neutral Archives Ecosystem
4.1.1 Imaging Modalities
4.1.2 PACS
4.1.3 Vendor Neutral Archives Software
4.1.4 Primary Subsystem (Primary Data Center)
4.1.5 Secondary Subsystem (Secondary Data Center)
4.2 Porters Five Forces Analysis
4.2.1 Threat From New Entrants
4.2.2 Threat From Substitutes
4.2.3 Competitors Rivalry
4.2.4 Bargaining Power Of Suppliers
4.2.5 Bargaining Power Of Buyers
4.3 Product Lifecycle
4.3.1 Introduction
4.3.2 PACS VS. VNA Product Lifecycle
4.4 Market Chasm Analysis

5 Global Picture Archiving And Communication System Market
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Departmental PACS
5.3 Enterprise PACS

6 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Delivery Mode
6.2.1 On-Premise (On-Site) VNA
6.2.2 Hybrid VNA
6.2.3 Fully Cloud-Hosted VNA
6.3 VNA Market, By Procurement Model
6.3.1 Departmental VNA
6.3.2 Multi-Departmental VNA
6.3.3 Multi-Site VNA
6.4 VNA Market, By Player Type
6.4.1 PACS Vendors
6.4.2 Independent Software Vendors
6.4.3 Infrastructure Vendors

7 Geographic Analysis
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Pest Analysis
7.2.1 Political Factors
7.2.2 Economical Factors
7.2.3 Social Factors
7.2.4 Technological Factors
7.3 North America
7.4 Europe
7.5 Asia-Pacific
7.6 ROW

8 Competitive Landscape
8.1 Competitive Situation & Trends
8.1.1 Introduction
8.1.2 New Product Launches
8.1.3 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations & Joint Ventures
8.1.4 Mergers & Acquisitions
8.1.5 Other Developments
8.2 Market Share Analysis

9 Company Profiles (Overview, Financials, Products & Services, Strategy, & Developments)*
9.1 ACUO Technologies (Perceptive Software)
9.2 AGFA Healthcare
9.3 Bridgehead Software
9.4 Carestream Health, Inc.
9.5 Dejarnette Research Systems, Inc.
9.6 Dell, Inc.
9.7 Fujifilm Corporation
9.8 GE Healthcare
9.9 Mach 7 Technologies
9.10 Mckesson Corporation
9.11 Merge Healthcare
9.12 Novarad Corporation
9.13 Philips Healthcare
9.14 Siemens Healthcare
9.15 Teramedica

*Details On Financials, Product & Services, Strategy, & Developments Might Not Be Captured In Case Of Unlisted Companies.

List Of Tables (54 Tables)

Table 1 Global VNA & PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 2 Global Picture Archiving and Communication System Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 3 Picture Archiving and Communication System Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 4 Global Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 5 Departmental PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 6 Radiology PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 7 Cardiology PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 8 Other Departmental PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 9 Enterprise PACS Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 10 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 11 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 12 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 13 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 14 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Delivery Mode, By Geography, 2013 ($Million) 75
Table 15 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Procurement Model, By Geography, 2013 ($Million)
Table 16 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Player Type, By Geography, 2013 ($Million)
Table 17 On-Premise VNA Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 18 Hybrid VNA Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 19 Fully Cloud-Hosted Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 20 Departmental VNA Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 21 Multi-Departmental VNA Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 22 Multi-Site VNA, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 23 PACS Vendors Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 24 Independent Software Vendors (ISV) Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 25 Infrastructure Vendors, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 26 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market, By Geography, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 27 North America: VNA & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 28 North America: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 29 North America: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 30 North America: VNA Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 31 North America: Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($ Million)
Table 32 North America: Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 33 Europe: VNA & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 34 Europe: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 35 Europe: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 36 Europe: VNA Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 37 Europe: Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 38 Europe Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 39 Asia-Pacific: VNA & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 40 Asia-Pacific: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 41 Asia-Pacific: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 42 Asia-Pacific: VNA Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 43 Asia-Pacific: Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 44 Asia-Pacific: Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 45 ROW: VNA & PACS Market, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 46 ROW: PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 47 ROW: Departmental PACS Market, By Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 48 ROW: VNA Market, By Delivery Mode, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 49 ROW: Market, By Procurement Model, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 50 ROW: Market, By Player Type, 2013 – 2018 ($Million)
Table 51 New Product Launches, 2010 – 2013
Table 52 Agreements, Partnerships, Collaborations & Joint Ventures, 2009 – 2013
Table 53 Mergers & Acquisitions, 2010 – 2013
Table 54 Other Developments, 2010 – 2013

List Of Figures (48 Figures)

Figure 1 Vendor Neutral Archives Market: Research Methodology
Figure 2 VNA & PACS Market Size Estimation Methodology – 1/2
Figure 3 VNA & PACS Market Size Estimation Methodology – 2/2
Figure 4 VNA & PACS Market: Data Triangulation Methodology
Figure 5 Market Dynamics
Figure 6 Market Dynamics – Impact Analysis
Figure 7 Vendor Neutral Archives Ecosystem
Figure 8 Vendor Neutral Archives Market: Porters Five Forces Analysis
Figure 9 PACS VS. VNA: Product Lifecycle
Figure 10 Vendor Neutral Archives: Market Chasm Analysis
Figure 11 Multi-Departmental VNA
Figure 12 Multi-Site VNA
Figure 13 Key Growth Strategies, 2010 – 2013
Figure 14 Global Vendor Neutral Archives Market Share Analysis, By Key Players, 2012 ($Million)
Figure 15 Imaging Studies Volume, By Key Players, 2012 (Million)
Figure 16 Lexmark International: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 17 Lexmark International: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010- 2012 ($Million)
Figure 18 ACUO Technologies: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 19 ACUO Technologies: SWOT Analysis
Figure 20 AGFA Healthcare: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 21 AGFA Healthcare: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Million)
Figure 22 AGFA Healthcare: Market Startegy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 23 SWOT Analysis: AGFA Healthcare
Figure 24 Bridgehead Software: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 25 Carestream Health, Inc.: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 26 Onex Corporation: Healthcare Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Million)
Figure 27 Carestream Health: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 28 SWOT Analysis: Dejarnette Research Systems
Figure 29 Dell, Inc. (Public Segment): Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 30 Dell, Inc.: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Billion)
Figure 31 Dell, Inc.: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 32 SWOT Analysis: Dell, Inc.
Figure 33 Fujifilm Information Solutions Business Segment: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2011 – 2013
Figure 34 GE Electric Company: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 35 GE Electric Company: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Billion)
Figure 36 GE Healthcare: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 37 GE Healthcare: SWOT Anaylsis
Figure 38 Mckesson Corporation: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2011 – 2013
Figure 39 Mckesson Corporation Technology Solution Segment: Total Revenue, By Sub-Segment, 2013 ($Million) Figure 40 Merge Healthcare, Inc.: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2010 – 2012 ($Million)
Figure 41 Merge Healthcare, Inc.: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2012
Figure 42 Philips: Total Revenue And Operating Margin, 2010 – 2012
Figure 43 Philips Healthcare: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2012 ($Million)
Figure 44 Philips Healthcare: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 45 Siemens Healthcare: Total Revenue And R&D Expenditure, 2010 – 2012
Figure 46 Siemens Ag: Total Revenue, By Segment, 2012 ($Million)
Figure 47 Teramedica: Market Strategy, 2010 – 2013
Figure 48 SWOT Analysis : Teramedica

FEATURED COMPANIES

  • AGFA Healthcare
  • Carestream Health, Inc
  • Fujifilm Corporation
  • Mach 7 Technologies
  • Merge Healthcare
  • Philips Healthcare
  • MORE

Vendor neutral archives are platforms aimed at empowering healthcare organizations to control, manage, store, and consolidate imaging data by streamlining the imaging workflow between PACS (Picture Archiving and Communication Systems), EHRs (Electronic Health Records), and data centers. The global market is estimated to be valued at $165.3 million in 2013 and is expected to reach $335.4 million by 2018, at a healthy CAGR of 15.2%.

Along with the global market for VNA, the PACS market is also given to provide a comparative analysis of both the healthcare information systems. The product lifecycles of each of these systems varies to a very large extent. It is believed that the vendor neutral archives market is positioned in a phase (exponential phase) where the PACS market was around 10 to 15 years ago. The PACS market, on the other hand, is a mature market that is typically characterized by the market players trying to invest in product differentiations and looking for new customer groups.

Based on the delivery mode of VNAs, the market is categorized into on-premise VNAs, hybrid VNAs, and fully cloud-hosted VNAs. On-premise VNAs dominate the current market in terms of total revenue contribution due to the high preference of this mode over others. This preference is as a result of better data control and high security provided by on-premise VNA solutions. However, owing to the large capital expenditure involved for on-premise VNAs, hybrid VNA solutions that involve a cloud-based component for storage are now capturing the attention of small and medium-sized healthcare providers. Thus, hybrid VNA solutions are slated to grow at a faster rate when compared to on-premise solutions, growing at a CAGR of 18.7% to reach $51.3 million by 2018.

The advantages of Vendor neutral archives over Picture archiving and communication system in terms of interoperability, flexibility, and accessibility are propelling the adoption of the VNA technology in the market. Apart from this, favorable and promising government reforms in the healthcare information technology field are also stimulating the market. The major hindrances to the growth of the market are rising incidences of data breaches, complexity of the VNA concept, lack of a proper industry-accepted definition of VNAs, and long VNA lifecycles (that impacts VNA deployment decisions). With this, the market is all set to witness trends such as integration of VNAs with EHRs, employment of cloud computing solutions for VNA products, and a holistic approach for delivering enhanced patient care.

North America is the largest contributor to this market and is valued at $140.3 million in 2013. Through acts such as HITECH (Healthcare Insurance Portability and Accountability) and ACA (Affordable Care), the U.S. market is expected to witness growing adoptions of EHRs and VNAs and hospital consolidations. The European market is poised to grow at a high double-digit CAGR of 16.6%, with the biggest market being U.K. owing to the presence of huge NHS trusts that purchase VNAs on a very large scale. Australia, China, and Japan are the next promising regions for embracement of this technology due to the government-supported nation-wide healthcare reforms taking place in these regions.

Key companies in this market include Acuo Technologies (U.S.), Agfa HealthCare (Belgium), BridgeHead Software (U.K.), Carestream Health (U.S.), Dell, Inc. (U.S.), GE Healthcare (U.K.), Fujifilm Corporation (Japan), Merge Health (U.S.), McKesson Corporation (U.S.), Philips Healthcare (The Netherlands), Siemens Healthcare (Germany), and TeraMedica (U.S.).

- ACUO Technologies (Perceptive Software)
- AGFA Healthcare
- Bridgehead Software
- Carestream Health, Inc
- Dejarnette Research Systems, Inc
- Dell, Inc
- Fujifilm Corporation
- GE Healthcare
- Mach 7 Technologies
- Mckesson Corporation
- Merge Healthcare
- Novarad Corporation
- Philips Healthcare
- Siemens Healthcare
- Teramedica

Note: Product cover images may vary from those shown

RELATED PRODUCTS

Our Clients

Our clients' logos